La influencia externa en las políticas educativas de Argentina, Brasil y Chile (1990-2006)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lc.v15i28.3504Keywords:
Globalización;, Agenda educativa global;, Educación para todos;, AGCSAbstract
El objetivo del artículo es analizar el papel que juega la influencia internacional en el diseño y aplicación de políticas educativas en el Cono Sur. Específicamente pretende explorar el proceso a través del cual las ideas, recomendaciones y metas globales modelan las políticas educativas latinoamericanas. Para ello, el artículo se centra en el programa de Educación para Todos y en el Acuerdo General de Comercio de Servicios, analizando los mecanismos de influencia externa que intervienen en cada caso ”“imposición, difusión y estandarización ”“, las formas a través de las cuales se “negocian” a escala nacional dichos programas y acuerdos y los efectos de dichos procesos en las políticas educativas nacionales de tres países de la región ”“ Argentina, Brasil y Chile.
Downloads
References
BONAL, X. Globalización y política educativa. Un análisis crítico de la agenda del Banco Mundialpara América Latina. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, México, v. 64, p. 3-35, 2002.
CARNOY, M. Globalization and educational reform. Paris: Unesco- International Institute forEducational Planning, 1999.
CHANDA, R. Social Services and the GATS: Key Issues and Concerns. World Development,Montréal (Canada), v. 31, n. 12, p. 1.997-2.011, 2003.
DALE, R. Specifying Globalisation Effects on National Policy: focus on the Mechanisms. Journalof Education Policy, London (GB), v. 14, p. 1-17, 1999.
______. Globalisation and Education: Demonstrating a ‘Common World Education Culture’ orLocating a ‘Globally Structured Educational Agenda’? Educational Theory, Urbana Champaign(USA), v. 50, p. 427-448, 2000.
______. Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education,London (GB), v. 41, p. 117-149, 2005.
DRAKE, W. J.; NICOLAIDIS, K. Ideas, Interests, and Institutionalization: “Trade in Services”and the Uruguay Round. International Organization, Baltimore (USA), v.46, n. 1, p. 37-100, 1992.
FEKETEKUTY, G. International Trade in Services. An overview and blueprint fornegotiations. Institute for Trade and Commercial Diplomacy. [on line]. Disponível em:, 2005.
FONTAINE TALAVERA, A. Equidad y calidad en educación: cinco proposicionesinterrelacionadas. Revista de Estudios Públicos, Santiago (Chile), v. 87, p. 5-38, 2002.
GARCÃA-GUADILLA, C. Balance de la década de los ‘90 y reflexiones sobre las nuevas fuerzasde cambio en la educación superior. In: MOLLIS, M. Las universidades en América Latina:¿Reformadas o alteradas?. Buenos Aires: Clacso, 2003.
GARCÃA-HUIDOBRO, J. E.; BELLEÃ, C.¿Remedio para la inequidad? La subvención escolarpreferencial. Revista Mensaje, Santiago (Chile), v. 55, n. 547, p. 40-44, mar./abr. 2006.
GELDEREN, A. M. van. Aportes y propuestas individuales y generales, sin diagnósticos. In:TEDESCO, J. C. ¿Cómo superar la desigualdad y la fragmentación del sistema educativo argentino?.Buenos Aires: Unesco- IIPE, p. 291-308, 2005.
GREEN, A. Education and globalization in Europe and East Asia: convergent and divergenttrends. Journal of Education Policy, London (GB), v. 14, p. 55-71, 1999.
HAY, C. Political Analysis. London: Palgrave, 2002.KELSEY, J. Legal Fetishism and the Contradictions of the GATS. Globalisation, Societies andEducation, London (GB), v. 1, n. 3, p. 267-280, 2003.
MUNDY, K.; IGA, M. Hegemonic Exceptionalism and Legitimating Bet-Hedging: paradoxesand lessons from the US and Japanese approaches to education services under the GATS.Globalisation, Societies and Education, London (GB), v. 1, n. 3, p. 321-357, 2003.
OZGA, J. S.; SEDDON, T.; POPKEWITZ, T. S. (Eds.). Education Research and Policy: Steeringthe Knowledge-based Economy. London: Routledge, 2006.
PAWSON, R. Evidence and Policy and Naming and Shaming. Policy Studies, London (GB), v. 23,n. 3-4, p. 211-230, sep./dec. 2002.
REIMERS F.; SHANO DA SILVA, C.; TREVINO, E. Where is the “education” in Conditional CashTransfers in Education? Unesco Institute for Statistics Working Papers, Montréal (Canada), n. 4, 2006.
RIZVI, F.; LINGARD, B. Globalization and the Changing Nature of the OECD’s EducationalWork. In: LAUDER, H.; BROWN, Ph.; DILLABOUG, J. A.; HALSEY, A. H. Education,Globalization and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
ROBERTSON, S.; BONAL, X.; DALE, R. GATS and the Education Service Industry: ThePolitics of Scale and Global Reterritorialization. Comparative Education Review, Chicago (USA),v. 46, p. 472-496, 2002.
ROBERTSON, S.; DALE, R. This is what the fuss is about! The implications of GATS for education systemsin the north and the south. Presented at UK Forum for International Education and Training, London, 2003.
ROBERTSON, S.; NOVELLI, M.; DALE, R.; TIKLY, L.; DACHI, H.; NDEBELA, A.Education and Development in a Global Era (Vol. II): ideas, actors and dynamics in the globalgovernance of education. London: Department for International Development, 2007.
SAUVÉ, P. Trade, Education and the GATS: What’s In, What’s Out, What’s All the Fuss About.Paris: OECD- Ceri, 2002.
SCHERRER, C. GATS: long-term strategy for the commodification of education. Review ofInternational Political Economy, Baltimore (USA), v. 12, n. 3, p. 484-510, 2005.
SILVA, M. O. From a Minimum Income to a Citizenship Income: the Brazilian Experiences.Institut de Drets humans de Catalunya, Barcelona (España), v. 1, 2005.
TARABINI, A. The spread of targeted educational policies in Latin America: global thesis andlocal impacts. International Studies in Sociology of Education, London (GB), v. 17, p. 21-43, 2007.
UNESCO. EFA Global Monitoring Report. The Quality Imperative. Paris: Unesco, 2005.
UNESCO- LLECE (Laboratorio Latinoamericano de Evaluación de la Calidad de la Educación).Estudio cualitativo de escuelas con resultados destacables en siete países latinoamericanos. Santiago deChile: Orealc- Unesco, 2002.
VERGER, A. La liberalización educativa en el marco del AGCS/GATS. Analizando el estado actualde las negociaciones. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, Tempe (USA), v. 14, p. 1-23, 2006.
______. GATS and the global politics of higher education. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
WORLD BANK. World Development Report: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington:The World Bank Group, 2004a.
______.Inequalities in Latin America: Breaking with the Past?. Washington: The World BankGroup, 2004b.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Linhas Críticas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-Authors maintains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authorers are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
