Coreografías didácticas institucionales y calidad de la enseñanza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lc.v25.2019.24586Keywords:
Choreography of Teaching, Learning environments, Higher education, University teaching, Teaching-Learning ProcessesAbstract
Teaching is "the intentional arrangement of situations in which appropriate learning will occur" (Menges, 1997). Based on this principle, many of the views and practices in education have changed the focus, shifting the role of what the teacher said or did to what students do in learning environments, specially prepared to enrich their experience and guide their learning. Choreographies, a metaphor taken from the world of dance (Oser and Baeriswyl, 2001), are part of these new perspectives on teaching. With a simple architecture, the choreographies contain 4 basic components: anticipation, external choreography, internal choreography and product. This article tries to situate the concept of choreography in the context of these new perspectives on university teaching and focuses, above all, on institutional choreography. An analysis model of institutional choreography based on 9 variables is presented: first, the three basic elements of all teaching (teacher, student, content); secondly, others linked to the characteristics of internal organization of the three basic elements of teaching mentioned (relations between teachers, relations between students, relationships between contents); and, finally, three other variables related to the relationship of each of these elements with the other two: relationships between teachers and students; relationships between students and content; relationships between teachers and content.
Downloads
References
Astin, A. (1999). Student involvement: a developmental theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529
Finkel, D. (2008). Dar clase con la boca cerrada. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1), 59109.
Harden, R.M. (2000). The integration ladder, a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Medical Education 2000, 34: 551-557
McLellan, H. (1995). Situated Learning Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Menges, R.J. (1997). Fostering faculty motivation to teach. Approaches to faculty development, en J.L. Bess (edit.): Teaching well and linking it. Motivating faculty to teach effectively. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, pag. 407-423.
Oser, F.K., & Baeriswyl, F.J. (2001). Choreographies of Teaching: bridging instruction to teaching, en V Richardson (edit.): Handbook of Research on Teaching (4h. Edition). Washington: AERA, pag. 1031-1065.
Pescarela, E.T., Seifert, T.A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are de NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42(1), 16-22.
Wonglorsaichon, B., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). The Influence of Student School Engagement on learning Achievement: a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3 (4), 323-344.
Zabalza Beraza, M.A. (2004). A Didáctica Universitaria. Un espazo disciplinar para o estudo e mellora da nosa docencia. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago.
Zabalza Beraza, M.A., Zabalza Cerdeiriña, Ma., & Ainhoa, De C.V., Ma. I. (2018). Identidad profesional del profesorado universitario, en I. Cantón y M. Tardif (Coord.): Identidad Profesional Docente, pp. 141-157. Madrid: Narcea.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Linhas Críticas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-Authors maintains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authorers are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).