“We are victims of one of the most brutal disinformation campaigns about the Amazon”: an analysis of Jair Bolsonaro’s speeches at the UN (2019– 2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v16n3.2025.58913Keywords:
Bolsonaro administration, Anti-environmental policy, Coproduction, Denialism, Environmental dismantlingAbstract
An aspect that drew attention during the Bolsonaro administration (2019-2022) was his anti environmental rhetoric and policy. The central argument of this article is that by denying environmental sciences, Bolsonaro not only sought to dismantle an epistemic order based on mainstream scientific knowledge, but also to (de)construct a social order. To support this argument, we analysed his United Nations speeches from 2019 to 2022 using the notion of coproduction, as defined in Science and Technology Studies (STS) by Jasanoff (2004a, 2004b). The results show Bolsonaro’s attempt to produce new representations for the Amazon and new identities for the media, science, foreign countries and a “new Brazil.” We conclude that Bolsonaro sought to redefine the truth about environmental issues in the country to underpin and legitimise the dismantling of an institutional order of environmental protection built in Brazil over decades. Based on this conclusion, we critically reflect on the STS literature on the denialism of Jair Bolsonaro and his followers and on the concept of post-truth.
Downloads
References
BARAD, K. Posthumanist Performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, v. 28, n. 3, 2003.
BARNES, B. Kuhn and Social Science. London and Basington: Macmillan Publishers Limited, 1982.
BEHR, K. A conspiração do clima: populismo e negacionismo climático no início do governo Bolsonaro (2018 – 2020). Brasília, Dissertação (Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável) – UnB, 2022. Available in: https:// repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/44634
BEHR, K. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free: environmental-climate conspiracy theories and populism at the beginning of the Bolsonaro administration (2018-2020). Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos [En ligne], Questions du temps présent, 2023. Available in: https://doi.org/10.4000/nuevomundo.93640
BLOOR, D. Conhecimento e Imaginário Social. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2009.
BONELLI, F.; FERNANDES, A.; CAVALCANTE, P. The active dismantling of environmental policy in Brazil: paralysis and setbacks of the deforestation inspection and control. Sustainability in Debate. Brasília, v. 14, n. 1, p. 58-80, 2023. DOI:10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.44277
BRONZ, D.; ZHOURI, A.; CASTRO, E. Apresentação Passando a boiada: violação de direitos, desregulação e desmanche ambiental no Brasil. Antropolítica - Revista Contemporânea de Antropologia, v. 49, 2020. Available in: https://doi.org/10.22409/antropolitica2020.i49.a44533
CALLON, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: LAW, J. (org.). Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge, p. 196 233, 1986.
CAMPBELL, K. K.; JAMIESON, K. H. Presidents creating the presidency: deeds done in words. Chicago and London. University of Chicago Press. 2008.
CAPELLA, A. C. N.; BRASIL, F. G. Prioridades em políticas públicas: Mensagens ao Congresso Nacional na agenda governamental (1991–2020). Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 30, n. 81, 2020. Available in: https://doi. org/10.1590/1678-987322308101
CASTRO, R. Negacionismos e temporalidades: antecipação, evidência e ciência na defesa do “tratamento precoce”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos CTS, v. 1, n. 1, p. 168–188, 2025.
CESARINO, L. Pós-Verdade e a Crise do Sistema de Peritos: uma explicação cibernética. Revista Ilha, v. 23, n. 1, p. 73-96, 2021.
CESARINO, L. O mundo ao avesso: verdade e política na era digital. São Paulo: Ubu Editora, 2022.
CESARINO, L.; SILVA, V. Pandemic States of Exception and the Alt-science of Early Treatment for Covid-19 in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, v. 50, n. 4, p. 210-227, 2023.
CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
COLLINS, H. Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism. Social Studies of Science, v. 110, n. 1, p. 3–10, 1981.
COLLINS, H. Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
COSTA, A. Negacionistas são os outros? Verdade, engano e interesse na era da pós-verdade. Principia, v. 25, n. 2, p. 305–334, 2021.
DRUMMOND, J. A.; CAPELARI, M.; BARROS, A. F. G. Brazilian environmental policy: a short biography, 1934-2020. Curitiba: Appris Editora, 2022.
DUARTE, T. O painel brasileiro de mudanças climáticas na interface entre ciência e políticas públicas: identidades, geopolítica e concepções epistemológicas. Sociologias, v. 21, n. 51, p. 76-101, 2019. Available in: https://doi. org/10.1590/15174522-0215103
DUARTE, T. Eu não sou antivacina: desconfiança vacinal entre bolsonaristas durante a pandemia da Covid-19. Revista Brasileira de Estudos CTS, v. 1, n. 1, p. 189-209. 2025.
DUARTE, T.; REYES-GALLINDO, L. Apresentação: Estudos Sociais das Ciências e Tecnologias. Pós – Revista Brasiliense de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais, v. 14, n. 2, p. 12-33, 2019. Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/334964050_Apresentacao_Estudos_Sociais_das_Ciencias_e_Tecnologias
DUARTE, D.; BENETTI, P. Pela ciência, contra os cientistas? Negacionismo e as disputas em torno das políticas de saúde durante a pandemia. Sociologias, v. 24, n. 60, p. 98-138, 2022.
DUARTE, D.; BENETTI, P.; ALVAREZ, M. Reconsidering the ‘post-truth critique’: scientific controversies and pandemic responses in Brazil. Social Studies of Science, v. 55, n. 5, p. 791–813, 2025.
DUTRA DA SILVA, M.; FEARNSIDE, P. M. Brazil: environment under attack. Environmental Conservation, p. 1-3, 2022. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892922000364
EPSTEIN, S. The Construction of Lay Expertise: aids activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 20, n. 4, p. 408–437, 1995.
FERNANDES, A. S. A.; TEIXEIRA, M. A. C.; ZUCCOLOTTO, R.; NASCIMENTO, A. B. F. M.; BONELLI, F. Dismantling and reconstruction of public policies in Brazil: from Bolsonaro’s destruction to the possibilities of union to rebuild. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, v. 16, n. 2, 2024. Available in: https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v16i2.15828
FLEURY, L.; MONTEIRO, M.; DUARTE, T. Brazil at COP26: political and scientific disputes under a post-truth government. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, v. 8, n. 3, p. 107–117, 2022. Available in: https:// estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/1381/663
FONSECA, I.; LINDOSO, D. P.; BURSZTYN, M. Deforestation (lack of) control in the Brazilian Amazon: from strengthening to dismantling governmental authority (1999-2020). Sustainability in Debate, v. 13, n. 2, p. 12–31, 2022.
FONSECA, P.; RIBEIRO, B.; NASCIMENTO, L. Demarcating Patriotic Science on Digital Platforms: covid-19, chloroquine and the institutionalisation of ignorance in Brazil. Science as Culture, v. 31, n. 4, p. 530-554, 2022.
FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2019.
FULLER, S. Post-Truth: knowledge as a power game. Londres: Anthem Press, 2018.
GIERYN, T. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 6, 1983.
GIERYN, T. Cultural Boundaries of Science: credibility on the line. Chicago e Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
GIFFONI PINTO, R.; MALERBA, J. A política (anti)ambiental nos Estados Unidos e no Brasil: uma análise comparativa. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 60, p. 143-166, 2022. Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma. v60i0.80062.
HARAWAY, D. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
HOCHSTETLER, K. O meio ambiente no governo Bolsonaro. In: AVRITZER, L.; KERCHE, F.; MARONA, M. Governo Bolsonaro: retrocesso democrático e degradação política. Belo Horizonte: Editora Autêntica, 2021.
JASANOFF, S. The idiom of co-production. In: JASANOFF, S. (org.). States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. New York: Routledge, 2004a. p. 1-12.
JASANOFF, S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: JASANOFF, S. (org.). States of knowledge: the co production of science and social order. New York: Routledge, 2004b. p. 13-45.
JASANOFF, S.; SIMMET, H. No funeral bells: public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age. Social Studies of Science, v. 47, n. 5, p. 751–770, 2017.
KELKAR, S. Post-truth and the Search for Objectivity: political polarization and the remaking of knowledge production. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, v. V, p. 86-106, 2019.
KUHN, T. S. The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Edited by James Conant and John Haugeland. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
KUHN, T. S. A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2005.
LATOUR, B. Jamais fomos modernos. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1994.
LATOUR, B. Ciência em Ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2000.
LATOUR, B. Reagregando o Social. Salvador; Bauru: Editora UFBA; Edusc, 2012.
LAW, J. Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, v. 5, n. 4, p. 379–393, 1992.
LYNCH, M. STS, symmetry and post-truth. Social Studies of Science, v. XLVII, n. 4. p. 593–599, 2017.
MENEZES, R.; BARBOSA JR., R. Environmental governance under Bolsonaro: dismantling institutions, curtailing participation, delegitimising opposition. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, v. 15, p. 229–247, 2021.
MIGUEL, J. Negacionismo climático no Brasil. Coletiva, n. 27, p. 1-11, 2020.
MIGUEL, J. A ‘meada’ do negacionismo climático e o impedimento da governamentalização ambiental no Brasil. Sociedade e Estado, v. 37, n. 1, p. 293-315, 2022. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202237010013
NASCIMENTO, L.; FONSECA, P.; de JESUS, J.; de OLIVEIRA, J. Poder oracular e ecossistemas digitais de comunicação: a produção de zonas de ignorância durante a pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil. Revista Fronteiras – estudos midiáticos, v. 23, n. 2, p.190-206, 2021.
RAJÃO, R.; NOBRE, A. D.; CUNHA, E. L. T. P.; DUARTE, T. R.; MARCOLINO, C.; SOARES-FILHO, B.; SPAROVEK, G.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; VALERA, C.; BUSTAMENTE, M.; NOBRE, C.; LIMA, L. S. de. O risco das falsas controvérsias científicas para as políticas ambientais brasileiras. Sociedade e Estado, v. 37, n. 1, p. 317-352, 2022. Available in: https://www.abc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/artigo-mercedes-raoni-etc.pdf
SHAPIN, S.; SCHAFFER, S. El Leviathan y la bomba de vacio: Hobbes, Boyle y la vida experimental. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial, 2005.
WYNNE, B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, v. 1, n. 3, p. 281–304, 1992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
![]( <a href="https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21100824458?dgcid=sc_widget_citescore" style="text-decoration:none;color:#505050"> <div style="height:100px;width:180px;font-family:Arial, Verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;background-color:#ffffff;display:inline-block"> <div style="padding: 0px 16px;"> <div style="padding-top:3px;line-height:1;"> <div style="float:left;font-size:28px"><span id="citescoreVal" style="letter-spacing: -2px;display: inline-block;padding-top: 7px;line-height: .75;">0.8</span></div> <div style="float:right;font-size:14px;padding-top:3px;text-align: right;"><span id="citescoreYearVal" style="display:block;">2024</span>CiteScore</div> </div> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <div style="padding-top:3px;"> <div style="height:4px;background-color:#DCDCDC;"> <div style="height: 4px; background-color: rgb(0, 86, 214); width: 15%;" id="percentActBar"> </div> </div> <div style="font-size:11px;"><span id="citescorePerVal">15th percentile</span></div> </div> <div style="font-size:12px;text-align:right;">Powered by <span><img alt="Scopus" style="width:50px;height:15px;" src="https://www.scopus.com/static/images/scopusLogoOrange.svg"></span></div> </div> </div> </a>)
