Policy change, dismantling and environmental protection in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.46600Keywords:
Environmental policy, Policy dismantling, Brazil, Environmental stewardshipAbstract
This article investigates recent changes in the field of Brazilian environmental policy, exploring contributions from the international literature on policy dismantling as applicable to the Brazilian case. Federal environmental policy is analysed over four decades (1981-2021) in light of the structural characteristics of environmental policy from the perspective of dismantling as a process involving relative change, focusing on the trajectory of a specific policy. The systematic direction of the changes made to paralyse key activities and environmental legal enforcement, jeopardising areas and topics across the agenda during the 2016-2022 period, allows the characterisation of that ongoing process as the dismantling of environmental policy, extending to the entire environmental stewardship framework. There is a need to deepen investigations to understand the still-undetermined effects of this dismantling, such as their impact, the permanence of its effects in the medium term, and the spread of consequences beyond the environmental area, as well as its possible long-term impact on the democratic regime.
Downloads
References
ARAÚJO, S. M. V. G. Environmental policy in the Bolsonaro government: the response of environmentalists in the legislative Arena. Brazilian Political Sciences Review, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 2, 2020.
ARAÚJO, S. M. V. G.; HERSCHMANN, S. O desmantelamento da política ambiental e seus reflexos na COP 26. PEX Executives, Presidents and Cabinet Politics. Belo Horizonte, dez. 2021. Available at: https://pex-network.com/category/special-reports/special-report-series-bolsonaro-administration-the-disruptive-presidency-in-brazil/. Accessed on: 11 jan. 2022.
AZUELA DE LA CUEVA, A. Visionarios y pragmáticos: una aproximación sociológica al derecho ambiental. México: Fontamara. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales: Unam, 2006.
BARCELOS, E. A. S. Desregulação ambiental e disputas políticas: uma breve retrospectiva do desmonte do licenciamento ambiental no Brasil. Ambientes: Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 278-329, 2020.
BAUER, M. W.; KNILL, C. Understanding policy dismantling: an analytical framework. In: BAUER, M. W. et al. Dismantling public policy: preferences, strategies and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 30-45.
BAUER, M. W.; KNILL, C. A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of policy change – measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Analysis: research and practice, London, v. 16, n. 1, p. 28-44, 2014.
BAUER, M. W.; PETERS, B. G.; PIERRE, J. Pathways to administrative resilience: public bureaucracies rule by democratic backsliders as a transnational challenge. Policy Analysis, European University Institute, [S. l.] v. 2001, n. 03, 2021.
BENJAMIN, A. H. Princípio da proibição de retrocesso ambiental. In: COLÓQUIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE O PRINCÍPIO DA PROIBIÇÃO DE RETROCESSO AMBIENTAL, 2012, Brasília, DF. Anais [...]. Brasília, DF: Congresso Nacional, mar. 2012. p. 55-72.
BRITO, A. S. et al. O caminho da autocracia – estratégias atuais de erosão democrática. São Paulo: Centro de Análise da Liberdade, 2022.
BURNS, C.; ECKERSLEY, P.; TOBIN, P. EU environmental policy in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, London, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2020.
CAPELARI, M. G. M. et al. Mudança em larga escala da política ambiental: análise da realidade brasileira. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1691-1710, nov./dez. 2020.
CONNELLY, J.; SMITH, G. Politics and the environment: from theory to practice. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2003.
DOBSON, A. Representative democracy and the environment. In: LAFFERTY, W.; MEADOWCROFT, J. Democracy and the environment: problems and prospects. Cheltenham; Lyme: Edward Elgar, 1996. p. 123-139.
DOWNS, A. El ciclo de atención a los problemas sociales: los altibajos de la ecología. In: AGUILAR VILLANUEVA, L. F. Problemas públicos y agenda de gobierno. 3. ed. México, DF: Miguel Angel Porrua Grupo Editorial, 2000. p. 141-159.
DURANT, R. Reconceptualizing purpose. In: DURANT, R.; FIORINO, D. J.; O’LEARY, R. (Ed.). Environmental governance revisited: challenges, choices and opportunities. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004. p. 29-34.
FIORINO, D. Making environmental policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
FREY, K. Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, Rio de Janeiro, n. 21, p. 213-259, jun. 2000.
GRAVEY, V.; JORDAN, A. Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. Journal of European Public Policy, London, v. 23, n. 8, p. 1180-1198, 2016.
GREENPEACE. Principais ameaças de fragilização da legislação ambiental e fundiária em andamento no Congresso Nacional. Atualização em fevereiro 2022. Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xIEp0tV3SnJd-y0ikDE2kjRsmUU73e54ZmAQ3bMY0TI/edit. Accessed on: 21 fev. 2022.
IMAFLORA. Mapeamento dos retrocessos de transparência e participação social na política ambiental brasileira – 2019 e 2020. Available at: https://www.imaflora.org/public/media/biblioteca/mapeamento_dos_retrocessos_de_transparencia_e_participacao_social_na_politica_ambiental_.pdf. Accessed on: 01 abr. 2022.
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS. Principais problemas do Substitutivo ao Projeto de Lei nº 3.729/2004, de 06.05.2021: Lei Geral do Licenciamento Ambiental (Lei da Não Licença e do Autolicenciamento). 10/05/2021. Available at: https://www.inesc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Principais-pontos-criticos-PL-3729-Subs.-Neri-Geller.pdf. Accessed on: 21 nov. 2021.
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS. A conta do desmonte – balanço do Orçamento Geral da União 2021. INESC: Brasília, 2022.
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SOCIOECONÔMICOS. Dando nome aos bois. Análise das medidas infralegais para o meio ambiente nos primeiros dois anos do Governo Bolsonaro. Available at: https://www.inesc.org.br/dando-nome-aos-bois-analise-das-medidas-infralegais-para-o-meio-ambiente-nos-primeiros-dois-anos-do-governo-bolsonaro/. Accessed on: 21 nov. 2021.
JÄNICKE, M. Democracy as a condition for environmental policy success: the importance of non-institutional factors. In: LAFFERTY, W.; MEADOWCROFT, J. Democracy and the environment: problems and prospects. Cheltenham; Lyme: Edward Elgar, 1996. p. 71- 85.
JORDAN, A.; BAUER, M. W.; GREEN-PEDERSEN, C. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, London, v. 20, n. 5, p. 795-805, 2013.
KNILL, C.; SCHULZE, K.; TOSUN, J. Measuring environmental policy change: conceptual alternatives and research implications. Reihe Politikwissenschaft, Political Science Series. 125, Wien: Institut fur Höhere Studien, oct. 2011.
KNILL, C.; SCHULZE, K.; TOSUN, J. Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: exploring a complex relationship. Regulation and Governance, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 427-44, dec. 2012.
KNILL, C.; TOSUN, J.; BAUER, M. W. Neglected faces of europeanization: the differential impact of the EU on the dismantling and expansion of domestic policies. Public Administration, [S. l.], v. 87, n. 3, p. 519-37, 2009.
KORTE, S.; JORGENS, H. The dismantling of environmental policies in the USA: the case of the new source review. In: CONFERENCE ON THE HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2010, Berlin. Proceedings […]. Berlin, 2010.
KRAFT, M. Environmental policy and politics. New York: Longman, 2001.
LAFFERTY, W. M.; MEADOWCROFT, J. (Ed.). Democracy and the environment. Problems and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.
MACHADO, P. A. L. Direito ambiental brasileiro. 20. ed. São Paulo: JusPODIVM, 2022.
MCALLISTER, L. Making law matter: environmental protection and legal institutions in Brazil. California: Stanford University Press, 2008.
MEADOWCROFT, J. Greening the State. In: STEINBERG, P. F.; VANDERVEER, S. D. (Ed.). Comparative environmental politics – theory, practice and prospects. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2012. p. 63-88.
MINC, C. et al. Projeto de lei geral do não licenciamento promove insegurança jurídica e ameaça agravar a crise econômica brasileira. Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.br/hubfs/Carta_ExMInistrosMMA_PL3729.pdf. Accessed on: 20 fev. 2023.
NEVES, E. M. S. C. Environmental governance in Brazil: the local government's perspective. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 3, p. 492-516, set./dez. 2016.
NEVES, E. M. S. C. Environmental regulation and institutional change in Brazil. In: CONFERENCE SECOND WORLD INTERDISCIPLINARY NETWORK FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, Rio de Janeiro. Proceedings [...]. Rio de Janeiro, set. 2015.
OBSERVATÓRIO DO CLIMA. A conta chegou. O terceiro ano de destruição ambiental sob Jair Bolsonaro. Available at: https://www.oc.eco.br/a-conta-chegou-o-terceiro-ano-de-destruicao-ambiental-sob-jair-bolsonaro/. Accessed on: 21 fev. 2022.
OBSERVATÓRIO DO CLIMA. Passando a boiada. O segundo ano de desmonte ambiental sob Jair Bolsonaro. Available at: https://www.oc.eco.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Passando-a-boiada-1.pdf. Accessed on: 21 nov. 2021.
OBSERVATÓRIO DO CLIMA. Brasil, 1000 dias de destruição. Como Jair Bolsonaro se tornou o negacionista climático mais perigoso do mundo. Available at: https://www.oc.eco.br/brasil-1-000-dias-de-destruicao-2/. Accessed on: 25 jan. 2022.
OBSERVATÓRIO DO CLIMA et al. A lei da não licença e do autolicenciamento: a extinção do licenciamento ambiental. Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org.br/hubfs/Nota_LicenciamentoAmbiental_06.05.2021.pdf. Accessed on: 21 nov. 2021.
OBSERVATÓRIO DO CÓDIGO FLORESTAL. Código Florestal. Avaliação 2017/2020. Available at: https://ipam.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/O-avanco-da-implementacao-do-Codigo-Florestal-no-Brasil-IPAM_V11-1-1.pdf. Accessed on: 20 out. 2022.
OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
PAEHLKE, R. Environmental challenges to democratic practice. In: LAFFERTY, W.; Meadowcroft, J. Democracy and the environment: problems and prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996. p. 18-38.
PAEHLKE, R. Environmental politics, sustainability and social sciences. Environmental Politics, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 1-22, 2001.
PAEHLKE, R. Sustainability. In: DURANT, R.; FIORINO, D. J.; O’LEARY, R. (Ed.). Environmental governance revisited: challenges, choices and opportunities. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004. p. 34-64.
PIRES, M. O. O cadastro ambiental rural: das origens às perspectivas para a política. Brasília: Conservação Internacional, 2013.
POLLEX, J.; LENSCHOW, A. Many faces of dismantling: hiding policy change in non-legislative acts in EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 20-40, 2020.
SILVA, J. A. Direito ambiental constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Malheiros, 2009.
SILVA, S. T. Direito fundamental ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado: avanços e desafios. Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS, v. 6, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2317-8558.51610
SILVA-SANCHEZ, S. S. Cidadania ambiental: novos direitos no Brasil. São Paulo: Humanitas: Annablume, 2000.
STEINEBACH, Y.; KNILL, C. Still an entrepreneur? The changing role of the European Commission in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 429-446, 2016.
STEEL, B.; CLINTON, R.; LOVRICH Jr., N. Environmental politics and policy. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
STERNER, T. Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. The World Bank: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 2003.
VIG, N.; KRAFT, M. Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century. 10. ed. Sage Publications: California, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
