Comparison of air quality standards between Brazil and countries from the five continents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n3.2023.50459Keywords:
Environmental pollution, Atmospheric emissions, Air quality standardsAbstract
This article presents a comparative study of air quality regulations. The main objective was to compare Brazil’s current technical air quality standards with international standards. The air quality standards defined by Brazil for PM2.5, PM10, lead, SO2, NO2, and O3 have higher values than international norms, and Brazil lacks standards for important pollutants like mercury, cadmium, nickel, toluene, and PAHs. The use of more permissive air quality standards significantly distorts the perception of potential exposure for the population, downplaying the actual impact on public health, leading to inadequate public health planning, and resulting in avoidable hospitalisations, premature deaths, and other intangible costs like reduced quality of life for the population.
Downloads
References
ABE, K.; MIRAGLIA, S. Health impact assessment of air pollution in São Paulo, Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 13, n. 7, p. 694, 11 Jul. 2016. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13070694.
AGUILERA, R. et al. Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California. Nature Communications, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1493, 5 Mar. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21708-0.
AUSTRALIA. 2004. Available at: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20200609071618/ https://www.environment.gov. au/resource/state-air-national-ambient-air-quality-status-and-trends-report-1991-2001. Accessed on: May 02, 2020.
BRAZIL. National Council for the Environment. Resolution Conama no. 003, de 15 de junho de 1989. Establishes the National Program for Air Pollution Control – Pronar. Ministry of the Environment: Conama. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF.
BRAZIL. National Council for the Environment. Resolution Conama no. 491, de 19 de novembro de 2018. Provides for air quality standards. Ministry of the Environment: Conama, 2018. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF.
BURNETT, R. et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Estados Unidos, v. 115, n. 38, p. 9592-9597, 18 Set. 2018. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803222115.
CANADA. 2012. Available at: https://ccme.ca/en/air-quality-report. Accessed on: Jan. 16, 2020.
CHIQUETTO, J. B. et al. Air quality standards and extreme ozone events in the São Paulo megacity. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 13, p. 3725, 2019.
COLOMBIA. 2017. Available at: http://www.ideam.gov.co/documents/51310/527391/2 .+Resoluci%C3%B3n+ 2254+de+2017+-+Niveles+Calidad+del+Aire..pdf/c22a285e-058e-42b6-aa88-2745fafad39f. Accessed on: Jan. 16, 2020.
EC. Directive 2008/50/EC of May 21, 2008. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/ PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008L0050-20080611&from=NL. Accessed on: Jan. 10, 2020.
EMBASSY OF JAPAN IN BRAZIL. Environmental issues, 2012. Available at: https://www.br.emb-japan.go.jp/ cultura/ambiente.html. Accessed on: Jun. 02, 2019.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY OF THE STATE OF SÃO PAULO. Air Quality Report in the State of São Paulo, São Paulo: Cetesb, p. 340, 2009. Available at: https://cetesb.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/relatorio- ar-2016.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 16, 2020.
FERNANDES, M. A. O. et al. Avoiding hospital admissions for respiratory system diseases by complying to the final Brazilian air quality standard: an estimate for Brazilian southeast capitals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 27, n. 29, p. 35889-35907, Oct. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07772-x.
GBD 2019. Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990- 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, Londres, v. 396, n. 10258, p. 1223–1249, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2.
JAPAN. 2009. Available at: https://www.env.go.jp/en/air/aq/aq.html. Accessed on: Jan. 20, 2019.
RAJAGOPALAN, S.; AL-KINDI, S. G.; BROOK, R. D. Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journals of the American College of Cardiology, v. 72, n. 17, p. 2054-2070, 23 oct. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacc.2018.07.099.
REIS, R. A. et al. Air pollution related to port activities in Paranaguá: impacts on the protected natural areas of the Paraná Atlantic Forest. 2019. Available at: http://www.iat.pr.gov.br/sites/agua-terra/arquivos_restritos/files/ documento/2020-12/projeto_39_2019.pdf. Accessed on: May 19, 2021.
SANTOS, C. Pollution prevention in industry: identification of opportunities, analysis of benefits and barriers. 2005. Thesis (Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering) – School of Engineering, São Carlos. University of São Paulo, São Carlos, 2005. Available at: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18139/tde-08042008-150419/ publico/ TeseCarmenluciaSantos.pdf. Accessed on: May 19, 2021.
SANTOS, U. P. et al. Environmental air pollution: respiratory effects. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, São Paulo, v. 47, n. 1, e20200267, 2021. DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200267.
SICILIANO, B. et al. The Updated Brazilian National Air Quality Standards: a critical review. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, v. 31, n. 3, mar. 2020. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/jbchs/a/PfgQRYrhznqJ6P7NHpjSkgG/ abstract/?lang=em. Accessed on: Feb. 14, 2022.
SOUTH AFRICA. 2009. Available at: https://www.dffe.gov.za/sites/default/files/ legislations/ nemaqa_airquality_ g32816gon1210_0.pdf. Accessed on: Feb. 05, 2020.
VALDAMBRINI, N. M.; RIBEIRO, F. N. D. Avaliação das Ultrapassagens dos Padrões de Ozônio Troposférico no Estado de São Paulo de 2014 a 2019. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia, v. 36, n. 4, oct-dec 2021. DOI: 10.1590/0102- 7786360046.
VANZ, A.; MIRLEAN, N.; BAISCH, P. Avaliação de poluição do ar por chumbo particulado: uma abordagem geoquímica. Química Nova, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 1, p. 25-29, jan. 2003. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-40422003000100006.
VARGAS, P. I. R.; HUSSEN, M.; BARBOSA, G. Intoxicação por Chumbo: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Médicas e da Saúde, v. 7, 2019.
VORMITTAG, E. M. P. A. et al. Análise do monitoramento da qualidade do ar no Brasil. Energia e Ambiente, v. 35, n. 102, May.-Aug. 2021. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/ea/a/fbCFjRbBRhf4M5F6xQVrbfR/ ?format=pdf&lang=pt. Accessed on: Feb. 14, 2022.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Hazardous chemicals to human health and the environment. International Program on Chemical Safety. São Paulo: Academic culture; 2008. Available at: https://www2.unesp.br/Home/ costsa_ses/20110610_084213.PDF. Accessed on: Oct. 02, 2023.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2005. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/69477. Accessed on: Jul. 02, 2019.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2016. Available at: http://who.int/phe/publications/air-pollution- global-assessment/en/. Accessed on: Jul. 02, 2019.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Evolution of WHO air quality guidelines: past, present and future. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2017. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0019/331660/Evolution-air-quality.pdf. Accessed on: Feb. 14, 2022.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. WHO Air quality guidelines – Update 2021. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe (2021). Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-09-2021-new-who-global- air-quality-guidelines-aim-to-save-millions-of-lives-from-air-pollution. Accessed on: Sept. 26, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
