Territorio, memoria e imaginario del trabajo
la hacienda y el Ejido Colectivo en Nueva Italia, México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v2i3.23063Keywords:
Territory. Memory. Nueva Italia Farm. Collective ejido. Cusi Family.Abstract
Memory and imaginary referred to territory and work show paradoxical dimensions of located life of subjects. Thus, this paper aims an approaching of two historical periods in the Tierra Caliente of Michoacan (México): the Hacienda Nueva Italia ”“belonging to a large state system”“and the Ejido ”“a type of collective farming property”“in order to better understand the relationship of the worker with this area, which defines a singular territory at the beginning of 20thcentury. Methodologically, the research compiles testimonies of current Nueva Italia’s inhabitants for a reconstruction of these periods through the analysis of imaginaries and bygone perception of territory, revealed by the former workers-informants. Consequently, the discussion is articulated around (i) the space and imaginary of the hacienda Nueva Italia in local memory, (ii) quotidian work in the hacienda and private life (iii) the struggle for the property of the land, iv) abundance and conflicts in the ejido, and (v) the Cusis and Cárdenas as allegories of the hacienda and the ejido.
Downloads
References
Alvarado-Sizzo, I. (2014). “Estas ruinas que ves”: la ex hacienda Nueva Italia, Michoacán, un patrimonio industrial en el olvido. Mec-edupaz5: 1-37.
Angón, P. (2001). Trabajadores agrícolas del valle del Tepalcatepec. En J.E. Zárate (Ed.), La Tierra Caliente de Michoacán. Zamora, México: El Colegio de Michoacán/Gobierno del Estado de Michoacán, pp. 267-292.
Assmann, J. (2010) Communicative and Cultural Memory. En A. Erll y A. Nünning (eds.), A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp.109-118.
Barrett, E.M. y Lynk, T. (1975). La cuenca del Tepalcatepec II: Su desarrollo moderno. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública (Sepsetentas, 178).
Bruner, Jerome. (2000). Actos de significado. Más allá de la revolución cognitiva. Madrid: Alianza.
Chevalier, J. (1999). La formación de los latifundios en México. Ciudad de México: FCE.
Claval, P. (1999). Los fundamentos actuales de la Geografía Cultural. Documents d’Anà lisi Geogrà fica, 34, 25-40.
Claval, P. (2005). Lieux de memoire. Revista Espaço e Cultura, nº 19, p. 89-106. https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/espacoecultura/article/view/3495/2423.
Costa, E. (2015). Metodologia para a geografia histórica urbana”“depoimentos orais como documentos. XIV Simposio Nacional de Geografia Urbana, Fortaleza, Brasil, pp. 01-35. http://www.lapur.ufc.br/site/index.php/acervo/simpurb-2015.
Costa, E. (2017). Ativacao popular do patrimonio-territorial na América Latina: teoria e metodologia. Cuadernosde Geografía, RCG, 26 (2), p. 53-75. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/rcg/article/view/59225/pdf Cusi, E. (1995). Memorias de un colono(3ª edición) México: Jus.
George, K. y Stratford, E. (2010). “Oral history and Human Geography”. En I. Hay (Ed.) Qualitative research methods in Human Geography. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press, pp. 139-151.
Glantz, S. (1974). El ejido colectivo de Nueva Italia. México: SEP-INAH.
Guerra, E. (2017). La violencia en la Tierra Caliente de Michoacán c. 1940-1980. Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México, 53: 59-75.
Halbwachs, M. (1990). A memória coletiva. São Paulo: Vértice, Editora Revista dos Tribunais.
Halbwachs, M. (1990a). Los marcos sociales de la memoria. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Lefebvre, H. (1999). A revolução urbana. São Paulo: Belo Horizonte: EdUFMG.
Lefebvre, H. (2001). O direito à cidade. São Paulo: Centauro Editora, 2001.
Lukács, G. (2012). Para uma ontologia do ser social I. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Mendoza García, Jorge. (2005). La formanarrativa de la memoria colectiva. Polis1 (1), 9-30.
Mendoza García, Jorge. (2005a). Exordio a la memoria colectiva y el olvido social. Athenea Digital. Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social, otoño, 1-26.
Meyer, J. (1987). Los “kulaki” del ejido (los años 30). Relaciones: Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 29(8), 23”“43.
Morett-Sánchez J.C. y Cosío Ruiz, C. (2017) Panorama de los ejidos y comunidades agrarias en México. Agricultura, sociedad y desarrollo, 14 (1). Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/jatsRepo/3605/360550545007/html/index.html (consultado el 09-02-2019.
Pureco Ornelas, J.A. (2008). Actores políticos y lucha por derechos laborales en la Tierra Caliente de Michoacán. Las huelgas de Lombardía y Nueva Italia, 1930-1933. Relaciones, 115 (24), 213-248.
Pureco, Alfredo. (2010). Empresarios lombardos en Michoacán. La familia Cusi entre el porfiariato y la posrevolución (1884-1938). México: El Colegio de Michoacán-Instituto Mora, 2010.
Ricoeur, Paul. (2002). Definición de la memoria desde un punto de vista filosófico. En Françoise Barret-Ducrocq (Dir.) ¿Por qué recordar?, Barcelona: Granica, pp. 24-28.
Riegl, Alöis. (1987). El culto moderno a los monumentos, Madrid: Visor.
Seydel, U. (2014). La constitución de la memoria cultural. Acta Poética35(2): 187-214.
Warman, A. (2002). El campo mexicano en el siglo XX. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 PatryTer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.
Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.
- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.
- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.
- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
