Formative assessment as recursive feedback in an academic writing teaching approach via textual genres

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rhla.v23i2.52393

Keywords:

Formative assessment, recursive feedback, academic writing, teaching via textual genres

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present a pedagogical proposal to use formative assessment in promoting the learning of the textual genre “research pre-project” at the undergraduate level. A teaching experience carried out in the Letters course of Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), in a subject developed in a workshop format will be reported. Teaching was oriented by the theorization about formative assessment as feedback, designed by Avelar (2019) for the approach via textual genres aimed at multiliteracies development (KALANTZIS; COPE, 2012; COPE; KALANTZIS, 2015). The teacher had the partnership of a monitor, whose performance was fundamental in enriching interactions with students and in managing assessment processes implemented throughout the academic writing process they experienced. In addition to the analysis of the students’ textual productions, the monitor's impressions and the students' opinions, generated through a semi-structured questionnaire answered at the end of the semester, were objects of our reflections. It was possible to conclude that the work fostered research, promoted reflection and collaboration, led to the production of knowledge and culminated in the delivery of pre-projects of considerable technical quality, capable of effectively expressing their authors’ research intentions. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Raquel Bambirra, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais

Professor at the Graduate Program of Languages Studies of CEFET-MG

Vanessa Teixeira, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais

Doctor in Languages Studies from CEFET-MG.

References

AVELAR, S. L. T. A operacionalização da avaliação formativa na abordagem de ensino de língua estrangeira (inglês) via gêneros textuais do CEFET-MG. 2019. 210 f. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos de Linguagens) – Pós-Graduação em Estudos de Linguagens, Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.

AVELAR, S.; BAMBIRRA, R. Process assessment in the pedagogy of multiliteracies – reflections about learning English as a foreign language in Brazil. In: SILVA, K. A.; DIAS, R. (Org.). A Rede Federal de Educação Profissional no Ensino Médio e da aprendizagem de inglês: visão geral e pedagogias vivenciadas. Campinas, SP: Pontes Editores, 2020. p. 269-292.

AVELAR, S.; VALENTE, V.; BAMBIRRA, R.; RACILAN, M. Awareness of the textual genre characteristics in the development of multiliteracies. In: 11th Annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference - INTED 2017: Sharing the passion for Learning. INTED 2017 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED Academy, 2017. p. 5177-5186.

BLOOM, B. S. Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, v. 1, n. 2, p. 1-12, 1968. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED053419. Acesso em: 11 ago. 2024.

BLOOM, B. S.; HASTINGS, J. T.; MADAUS, G. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

CARLESS, D.; BOUD, D. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1315-1325, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354?needAccess=true. Acesso em: 18 maio 2024.

COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. The things you do to know: an introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In: ______. (Ed.). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: learning by design. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. p. 1-36.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Language as a social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.

KALANTZIS, M.; COPE, B. Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

MARTIN, J. R. Genre and language learning: a social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, v. 20, n. 1, p. 10-21, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0898589809000060?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 11 ago. 2024.

RAMAPRASAD, A. On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, v. 28, n. 1, p. 4-13, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bs.3830280103. Acesso em: 11 ago. 2024.

SCRIVEN, M. The methodology of evaluation. Social Science Educational Consortium: publication 110. Lafayette, 1966. Disponível em: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED014001. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2024

Published

2024-12-23

How to Cite

Bambirra, R., & Teixeira, V. (2024). Formative assessment as recursive feedback in an academic writing teaching approach via textual genres . Revista Horizontes De Linguistica Aplicada, 23(2), DT12. https://doi.org/10.26512/rhla.v23i2.52393

Issue

Section

Dossier: Academic Writing from Different Theoretical Approaches

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.