Podem as humanidades digitais produzir teoria?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rhh.v12i24.55093Keywords:
humanidades digitais, história digital, ciência abertaAbstract
The text deals with an alleged theoretical weakness in production in digital humanities, supposedly much more focused on developing methodologies and tools than on answering more fundamental epistemological questions. Starting from Enrica Salvatori's reflections, part of the debate on the problem and its historical trajectory is recovered. Contrasted with some referential perspectives is the hypothesis that the interdisciplinarity characteristic of digital humanities could contribute to their difficulties in producing theory and questioning established paradigms. Rather than supporting a skeptical or cynical position, the argument relies on the potential of open science and collaborative research to overcome the problem.
Downloads
References
Albagli, Sarita, Lucia M. Maciel, and Hannud A. Abdo, eds. Ciência Aberta, Questões Abertas. Brasília: IBICT; Rio de Janeiro: UNIRIO, 2015. https://livroaberto.ibict.br/bitstream/1/1060/1/Ciencia%20aberta_questoes%20abertas_PORTUGUES_DIGITAL%20%285%29.pdf.
Blevins, Cameron. "Digital History’s Perpetual Future Tense." In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 2012.
Carosotti, Giovanni. “La Digital History: tra superamento della figura dello ‘storico’ e ripensamento della didattica della storia”. L'identità di Clio (blog). Dicembre 2023. https://www.lidentitadiclio.com/la-digital-history-tra-superamento-della-figura-dello-storico-e-ripensamento-della-didattica-della-storia/.
Ferla, Luis et al. "Pauliceia 2.0: mapeamento colaborativo da história de São Paulo, 1870-1940." História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 27: 1207-1223, 2020. https://www.scielo.br/j/hcsm/a/LsTg5nrNLZXdd8mfdGSNr7C/?format=pdf&lang=pt.
Ferla, Luis et al. "Clio’s (mis)adventures With Hermes, Hestia, and Hephaestus." Historiografías, December, 6-26, 2023. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_historiografias/hrht.10035.
Fogel, Robert William, and Stanley L. Engerman. Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. New York: Norton, 1995.
Minimal Computing Working Group. "About." Minimal Computing: A Working Group of GO::DH, 2022. https://go-dh.github.io/mincomp/about/.
Scheinfeldt, Tom. "Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?" In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
Scheinfeldt, Tom. "Where’s the Beef? Does Digital Humanities Have to Answer Questions?" In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011a.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 History, histories
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
