Coordination of collective action in family livestock in Uruguay

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v12n1.2021.35078

Keywords:

Collective processes. Family production. Rural development.

Abstract

Uruguay’s family livestock production shows an array of varied organizational arrangements, whose diversity reflects the different needs, interests, and even feelings, and values of the producers. Accordingly, cooperation processes aiming at obtaining both individual and collective benefits show different formalization and coordination frameworks. Through a series of interviews with representatives of family rancher’s group in the region known as “Litoral Norte” (Northern Coast) of Uruguay, an attempt was made understand how collective action is coordinated in the region. Results account for diverse endogenous and / or exogenous processes, which reflect the existence of shared norms, learning processes and rules of use, as a means to solve collective action problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Virginia Courdin, MSc. in Environment and Development, PhD Student, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay

PhD Student, MSc. in Environment and Development, Professor, Dpto. de Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay

References

AGRAWAL, A. Successful collective action among village forest management institutions in the Indian Himalayas. Himalaya Research Bulletin, v. 16, p. 19-28. 1996.

AGRAWAL, A.; OSTROM, E. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, v. 29, p. 485-514. 2001.

ALVAREZ-GAYOU, J. Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y Metodología. México DF: Paidós Mexicana. 2003.

ARBELETCHE, P.; COURDIN, V.; OLIVEIRA, G. Soja y forestación: los impactos sobre la ganadería uruguaya. In: JORNADAS INTERDISCIPLINARIAS DE ESTUDIOS AGRARIOS Y AGROINDUSTRIALES, V, 2007. Buenos Aires: CIEA, FCE-UBA. 2007.

ARBELETCHE, P. et al. La experiencia en Uruguay de las Mesas de Desarrollo Rural en territorios de agricultura familiar. Revista Eutopia, Flacso Sede Ecuador, v. 15, p. 147-166. 2019. Disponible en: <https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/eutopia/article/view/3888>. Acess: oct. 2020

BLANCHET, A.; GOTMAN, A. L’enquete et ses méthodes: l’entretien. Paris: Armand Colin. 2005.

COUDEL, E. Formation et apprentissages pour le développement territorial: regards croisés entre économie de la connaissance et sciences de gestion. 2009. 443 p. Tesis Doctoral. Centre International d’Etudes Supérieures en Sciences Agronomiques. Montpellier, Francia. 2009. Disponible en: <https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00371589>. Acess: oct. 2020.

COURDIN, V.; SABOURIN, E. Continuidad y renovación en la acción colectiva de los ganaderos familiares del litoral noroeste de Uruguay. Revista Eutopia, Flacso Sede Ecuador, v. 13, p. 11-32. 2018. Disponible en: <https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/eutopia/article/view/3290>. Acess: oct. 2020.

DENNIS, E.; BRONDIZIO, E. Problem farming influences linkages among network of collective action situations for water provision, wastewater, and water conservation in a Metropolitan Region. International Journal of the Commons, v. 14, n. 1, p. 313-328. 2020.

LARRAMBEBERE, F. Enfoque complementario: el Grupo Francia Navarro. In: MORALES, H.; DIEGUEZ, F. (Ed.). Familias y campo. Rescatando estrategias de adaptación. Montevideo: Instituto Plan Agropecuario, 2009. p. 185-195.

LAVIGNE, P. Pour des systèmes irrigués autogérés et durables: façonner les institutions. Paris: GRET Groupe de travail périmètres irrigués, 2001.

MAHONEY, J. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society. University of California at Davis, v. 29, n. 4, p. 507-548. 2000. Disponible en: <http://webarchiv.ethz.ch/soms/teaching/OppFall09/MahoneyPathDependence.pdf>. Acess: oct. 2020.

MARTÍNEZ, P. El método de estudio de caso. Estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica. Pensamiento y Gestión: revista de la División de Ciencias Administrativas de la Universidad del Norte, Colombia, v. 20, p. 165-193. 2006. Disponible en: <https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/646/64602005.pdf>. Acess: oct. 2020.

MONDELLI, J. et al. Los cambios en la ganadería por la competencia por el recurso tierra. In: CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES AGRARIAS, I, 2012. Montevideo: Facultad de Agronomía. 2012.

NEGI, S. et al. Role of community and user attributes in collective action: case study of community-based forest management in Nepal. Forests, v. 9, n. 3, p. 136. 2018. Disponible en: <https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/9/3/136>. Acess: oct. 2020.

OLSON, M. La lógica de la acción colectiva: bienes públicos y la teoría de grupos. México DF: Limusa Noriega Editores. 1992.

OSTROM, E. Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco: ICS Press, Institute for contemporary studies. 1992.

OSTROM, E. A behavioural approach to the rational-choice theory of collective ac-tion. American Political Science Review, Cambridge University, v. 92, n. 1, p. 1-22. 1998. Disponible en: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2585925?seq=1>. Acess: oct. 2020.

OSTROM, E. El gobierno de los bienes comunes. La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Colección Económica. México DF: FCE, UNAM. 2000.

OSTROM, E.; AHN, T. Una perspectiva del capital social desde las ciencias sociales: capital social y acción colectiva. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, Universidad Autónoma de México, v. 65, n. 1, p. 155-233. 2003. Disponible en: <http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rms/v65n1/v65n1a5.pdf>. Acess: oct. 2020.

POTEETE, A.; JANSSEN, M.; OSTROM, E. Trabajar juntos. Acción colectiva, bienes comunes y múltiples métodos en la práctica. Colección Económica. México DF: Unam, Ceiich, Crim, FCPS, FE, IIEc, IIS, Puma, Iasc, Cide, Colsan, Conabio, CCMSS, FCE, UAM. 2012.

SABOURIN, E. Mudanças sociais, organização dos produtores e intervenção externa. In: CAROT, P.; SABOURIN, E. (Ed.). Camponeses do Sertão: mutação das agriculturas familiares no Nordeste do Brasil. Brasília: Embrapa, 2003. p. 145-178.

SABOURIN, E. Manejo dos Recursos Comuns e Reciprocidade: os aportes de Elinor Ostrom ao Debate. Sustentabilidade em Debate, v. 1, n. 2, p. 141-158. 2010.

VARUGHESE, G.; OSTROM, E. The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development, v. 29, n. 5, p. 747-765. 2001.

VASSALLO, M. Dinámica y competencia intrasectorial en el agro. Uruguay 2000-2010. Montevideo: Dpto. Publicaciones Facultad de Agronomía. 2011.

Published

2021-04-29 — Updated on 2021-05-07

How to Cite

Courdin, V. (2021). Coordination of collective action in family livestock in Uruguay. Sustainability in Debate, 12(1), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v12n1.2021.35078

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.