Ceci est une version obsolète publiée le 2022-04-29. Consulter la version la plus récente.

Agroforestry systems associated with natural regeneration: alternatives practiced by family-farmers of Tomé-Açu, Pará

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n1.2022.40855

Mots-clés :

Species richness. Species diversity. Floristics. Amazon.

Résumé

The objective of this article was to analyze the benefits of Agroforestry Systems (AFSs) association with natural regeneration promoted by family farmers of Tomé-Açu, Pará, Brazil. Based on 46 previous interviews with family farmers, 12 of them were selected due to the presence of AFSs with different levels of tree species diversity, in which richness and diversity of tree species were taken into account. In addition, the measurement of the floristic variables was carried out. Results showed that 17% of the AFSs have natural regeneration corridors. This type of AFS has high species richness and diversity (Shannon-Weaner = 2.5), and its main characteristic is the presence of regeneration corridors of secondary forests. Therefore, farmers make production and forest regeneration compatible, and: a) maintain in their AFSs environmental services provided by regenerated secondary forests, b) ensure food security for their families, and c) they may have financial incomes from selling AFS products.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Mário Oliveira Neto, Master’s Degree in Family Farming and Sustainable Development, Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil

I have a degree in Forest Engineering from the Federal Rural University of the Amazon, a master's degree in Family Agriculture and Sustainable Development from the Postgraduate Program in Amazon Agriculture at the Federal University of Pará. I have experience in the area of Non-Timber Forest Resources Management, Agroforestry Systems and Family Agriculture, with an emphasis on Interdisciplinarity and Conflict Resolution in Local Communities. I work mainly with: family farming, agroforestry systems, forest management, rural sociology and sustainable rural development.

Livia de Freitas Navegantes Alves, PhD in Agroecosystems, Full Professor, Amazon Institute of Family Agriculture Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil

Agronomist from the Federal Rural University of the Amazon (1993), Master in Animal Science from the Federal University of Pará (1999) and PhD in Agroecosystems - SUPAGRO (Montpellier - France, 2011). Professor at the Federal University of Pará, since 2001, currently working at the Instituto Amazônico de Agricultura Familiares - INEAF, permanent professor at the Postgraduate Program in Amazonian Agriculture. Associate Researcher of the Strategic Monitoring of South-American Regional Transformation network. Experience in agronomy from a systemic perspective, working mainly on the following topics: agricultural practices, Amazonian production systems, Amazonian agroecosystems, family farming and sustainable development.

Gustavo Schwartz, PhD in Ecology and Forest Management, Researcher, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Belém, PA, Brazil

Degree in Biological Sciences from the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) in 1999, a Master's degree in Ecology from the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) in 2001 and a PhD in Ecology and Forest Management from the Wageningen University (WUR) in the Netherlands in 2013. Researcher A at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Eastern Amazon Unit in Belém (PA) and Permanent Professor at the Graduate Program in Forest Sciences at the Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Belém Campus. Develops research in Ecology (Populations and Communities), Management, Forestry, Recovery and Conservation of Tropical Forests.

Références

ALTIERI, M. A. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. In: Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. Elsevier, 1999. p. 19-31.

ALTIERI, M. A.; NICHOLLS, C. I. Agroecology: Challenges and opportunities for farming in the Anthropocene. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria: revista latinoamericana de ciencias de la agricultura, v. 47, n. 3, p. 204-215, 2020.

BOLFE, É. L.; BATISTELLA, M. Análise florística e estrutural de sistemas silviagrícolas em Tomé-Açu, Pará. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 46, p. 1139-1147, 2011.

BRASIL. Lei Nº 11.326, de 24 de julho de 2006. Art. 3º. Available in: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11326.htm. Access on: 31 jan. 2022.

CARNEIRO, R. DO V.; NAVEGANTES-ALVES, L. DE F. A diversidade de experiências de recuperação florestal praticada por agricultores familiares do Nordeste do Pará. Geoambiente On-line, n. 35, p. 293-314, 2019.

CHAYANOV, A. V. La organización de la unidad económica campesina. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, v. 2, 1974.

CHAZDON, R. L. Second Growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration 485. An Age of Deforestation, 2014.

CHAZDON, R. L.; GUARIGUATA, M. R. Natural regeneration as a tool for large?scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica, v. 48, n. 6, p. 716-730, 2016.

DOS SANTOS, V. A. H. F.; FERREIRA, M. J. Initial establishment of commercial tree species under enrichment planting in a Central Amazon secondary forest: effects of silvicultural treatments. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 460, p. 117822, 2020.

DUBOIS, J. C. L. A importância de espécies perenes de maior valor econômico em sistemas agroflorestais. In: SILVA, I. C. Sistemas Agroflorestais: conceitos e métodos. Itabuna: SBSAF, 2013.

ELIAS, F. et al. Assessing the growth and climate sensitivity of secondary forests in highly deforested Amazonian landscapes. Ecology, v. 101, n. 3, p. e02954, 2020.

GEERTZ, C. A religião como sistema cultural. A interpretação das culturas, v. 2, 1989.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. 2010, 2015, 2018. Available in: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/pa. Access on: 23 nov. 2018.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Produção de extração vegetal e da silvicultura. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Brasil, 2016. Available in: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9105-producao-da-extracao-vegetal-e-da-silvicultura.html?=&t=series-historicas. Access on: 23 nov. 2018.

MAGURRAN, A. E. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, 1988.

MANN, P. H.; VELHO, O. A. Métodos de investigação sociológica. 1969.

MARTINS, P. S. Dinâmica evolutiva em roças de caboclos amazônicos. Estudos Avançados, v. 19, p. 209-220, 2005.

MILLER, R. P. Construindo a complexidade: o encontro de paradigmas. In: PORRO, A. Alternativa agroflorestal na Amazônia em transformação. Brasília-DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2009.

NAIR, P. K. R. An introduction to agroforestry. Springer Science & Business Media, 1993.

ODUM, E. P. Fundamentos de Ecologia. 7. ed. 2004.

OSTY, P. L. L'entreprise agricole dans son environnement: propositions pour structurer une evaluation de la strategie. 1978.

PIAZZA, G. E. et al. Regeneração natural de espécies madeireiras na floresta secundária da Mata Atlântica. Advances in Forestry Science, v. 4, n. 2, p. 99-105, 2017.

PIZARRO, A. Amazônia: as vozes do rio. Imaginário e modernização. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2012.

PLOEG, JAN D. VAN DER et al. Dez qualidades da agricultura familiar. 2014.

POMPEU, G. DO S. DOS S.; KATO, O. R.; ALMEIDA, R. H. C. Percepção de agricultores familiares e empresariais de Tomé-Açu, Pará, Brasil sobre os Sistemas de Agrofloresta. Sustainability in Debate, v. 8, n. 3, 2017.

POORTER, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature, v. 530, n. 7589, p. 211-214, 2016.

SCHWARTZ, G. et al. Post-harvesting silvicultural treatments in logging gaps: a comparison between enrichment planting and tending of natural regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 293, p. 57-64, 2013.

SEBILLOTTE, M. Agronomie et agriculture. Essai d’analyse des tâches de l’agronome. Cahiers de L’Orstom, v. 24, p. 3-25, 1974.

SILVA, I. C. Sistemas Agroflorestais: conceitos e métodos. Itabuna: SBSAF, 2013.

STRATE, M. F. et al. Sistemas agroflorestais: agrobiodiversidade, soberania, segurança alimentar e nutricional na promoção de saúde frente a pandemia da Covid-19. Cadernos de Agroecologia, v. 15, n. 4, 2020.

TAFNER JR, A. W.; SILVA, F. C. Colonização japonesa, história econômica e desenvolvimento regional do Estado do Pará. Novos cadernos Naea, v. 13, n. 2, 2011.

TEIXEIRA, H. M. et al. Linking vegetation and soil functions during secondary forest succession in the Atlantic forest. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 457, p. 117696, 2020.

VEENHOVEN, R. El estudio de la satisfacción con la vida. Intervención Psicosocial. Erasmo Universidad Rotterdam, v. 3, 1994.

VEENHOVEN, R. Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. Journal of happiness studies, v. 9, n. 3, p. 449-469, 2008.

VIANA, V. M.; DUBOIS, J. C. L.; ANDERSON, A. B. Manual agroflorestal para a Amazônia. Rio de Janeiro: Rebraf, 1996.

VIEIRA, D. L. M. et al. Avaliação de indicadores da recomposição da vegetação nativa no Distrito Federal e em Mato Grosso. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. Nota Técnica/Nota Científica (ALICE), 2018.

VIEIRA, I. C. G.; GARDNER, T. A. Florestas secundárias tropicais: ecologia e importância em paisagens antrópicas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi-Ciências Naturais, v. 7, n. 3, p. 191-194, 2012.

VINUTO, J. A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas, v. 22, n. 44, p. 203-220, 2014.

WANDERLEY, M. DE N. B. Raízes históricas do campesinato brasileiro. Agricultura familiar: realidades e perspectivas, v. 3, p. 21-55, 1996.

WOORTMANN, E. F. O saber camponês: práticas ecológicas tradicionais e inovações. Diversidade do campesinato: expressões e categorias, v. 2, p. 119-129, 2009.

YAMADA, M.; GHOLZ, H. L. An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, v. 55, n. 2, p. 81-87, 2002.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2022-04-29

Versions

Comment citer

Oliveira Neto, M., Alves, L. de F. N., & Schwartz, G. . (2022). Agroforestry systems associated with natural regeneration: alternatives practiced by family-farmers of Tomé-Açu, Pará. Sustainability in Debate, 13(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n1.2022.40855

Numéro

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2022): Sustainability in Debate / Sustentabilidade em Debate

Rubrique

Artigos

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Sustainability in Debate 2022

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.

SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement

The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.