Environmental impacts of hydropower plants in Brazil: an identification guide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n1.2022.40635Keywords:
IA. IS. Environmental Impact. Hydroelectric power plants. Guide.Abstract
This paper presents a guide for identifying the environmental impacts of hydroelectric enterprises. The qualitative research used the following methods: case studies, systematic literature review (SLR), content analysis, and consultation with expe ts. Four sources of information were used, including Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), scientific articles, best practice guides, and expert consultation. All EISs of hydroelectric plants submitted to the Brazilian federal Environmental Licensing between 2010 and 2020 (8 EISs) were analysed. RSL identified 68 scientific papers eligible for analysis and collection of impacts. The results were compared with Canadian practice and discussed in a virtual workshop of 15 expe ts. The guide has 90 impacts and can be used by environmental consulting firms and environmental agencies in the preliminary identification of environmental impacts of hydroelectric dams, contributing to the improvement of planning carried out in the EIA scoping stage of future environmental studies of this type.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, M. R. R.; MONTAÑO, M. A Efetividade dos Sistemas de Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental nos Estados de São Paulo e Minas Gerais. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. XX, n. 2, p. 79–106, 2017.
ALP, A.; AKYÜZ, A.; KUCUKALI, S. Ecological impact scorecard of small hydropower plants in operation: an integrated approach. Renewable Energy, v. 162, p. 1605–1617, 2020.
ÁLVAREZ-TRONCOSO, R. et al. Impacts of hydroelectric power stations on Trichoptera assemblages in four rivers in NW Spain. Limnologica, v. 53, p. 35–41, 2015.
ANEEL. Sistema de Informações de Geração da Aneel (Siga). Disponível em: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNjc4OGYyYjQtYWM2ZC00YjllLWJlYmEtYz dkNTQ1MTc1NjM2IiwidCI6IjQwZDZmOWI4LWVjYTctNDZhMi05MmQ0LWVhNGU5 YzAxNzBlMSIsImMiOjR9. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2021.
ATHAYDE, S. et al. Improving policies and instruments to address cumulative impacts of small hydropower in the Amazon. Energy Policy, v. 132, n. October 2018, p. 265–271, set. 2019.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Licenciamento ambiental de empreendimentos hidrelétricos no Brasil: uma contribuição para o debate. Relatório síntese, 2008. Disponível em: http://pnla.mma.gov.br/publicacoes-diversas?download=88:licenciamento-ambientalde-empreendimentos-hidreletricos-no-brasil. Acesso em: 01 mar. 2021.
BAOLIGAO, B. et al. Acute impacts of reservoir sediment flushing on fishes in the Yellow River. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, v. 13, p. 26–35, 2016.
BATISTA, B. et al. Revisão dos Impactos Ambientais Gerados na Fase de Instalação das Hidrelétricas: uma análise da Sub-Bacia do Alto Juruena. Biodiversidade, v. 11, n. 1, p. 69–85, 2012.
BERG, B. L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 4. ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
BORIONI, R.; GALLARDO, A. L. C. F.; SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Advancing scoping practice in environmental impact assessment: an examination of the Brazilian federal system. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 35, n. 3, p. 1–14, 17 jan. 2017.
BRAGAGNOLO, C. et al. Streamlining or sidestepping? Political pressure to revise environmental licensing and EIA in Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 65, n. November 2016, p. 86–90, jul. 2017.
BRASIL. Presidência da República. Lei 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, 02 de set.1981.
BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente. Resolução nº 01, de 23 de janeiro de 1986. Dispõe sobre critérios básicos e diretrizes gerais para a avaliação de impacto ambiental. Diário Oficial da União, 17 fev. 1986.
CASTRO-DIAZ, L.; LOPEZ, M. C.; MORAN, E. Gender-Differentiated Impacts of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Dam on Downstream Fishers in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecology, v. 46, n. 3, p. 411–422, 2018.
CORBIN, J.; STRAUSS, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3. ed. Califórnia: Sage Publications, 2008.
ELORANTA, A. P. et al. Hydropower impacts on reservoir fish populations are modified by environmental variation. Science of the Total Environment, v. 618, p. 313–322, 2018.
ESPA, P. et al. Tackling reservoir siltation by controlled sediment flushing: impact on downstream fauna and related management issues. PLoS ONE, v. 14, n. 6, p. 1–26, 2019.
EZCURRA, E. et al. A natural experiment reveals the impact of hydroelectric dams on the estuaries of tropical rivers. Science Advances, v. 5, n. 3, 2019.
GLASSON, J.; THERIVEL, R.; CHADWICK, A. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. 4. ed. London: Routledge, 2012.
HANNA, P. et al. The importance of cultural aspects in impact assessment and project development: reflections from a case study of a hydroelectric dam in Brazil. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 34, n. 4, p. 306–318, 2016.
HUANG, X. et al. Cumulative impact of dam constructions on streamflow and sediment regime in lower reaches of the Jinsha River, China. Journal of Mountain Science, v. 15, n. 12, p. 2752–2765, 2018.
IAAC. Policy and guidance. Disponível em: https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance.html. Acesso em: 03 nov. 2021.
IAIA; IEA – International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute for Environmental Assessment. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. UK, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/Principles%20of%20IA%2019.pdf. Acesso em: 19 dez. 2021.
KRIPPENDORFF, K. Content Analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2. ed. Califórnia: Sage Publications, 2004.
LIQUETE, C. et al. Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, v. 8, n. 7, 2013.
LIU, M. et al. Sources and transport of methylmercury in the Yangtze River and the impact of the Three Gorges Dam. Water Research, v. 166, p. 115042, 2019.
MATTHEWS, B.; ROSS, L. Research Methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson, 2010.
MOHER, D. et al. Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: a recomendação Prisma. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, v. 24, n. 2, p. 335–342, jun. 2015.
NORMANDO, F. T. et al. Impact of the Três Marias dam on the reproduction of the forage fish Astyanax bimaculatus and A. fasciatus from the São Francisco River, downstream from the dam, southeastern Brazil. Environmental Biology of Fishes, v. 97, n. 3, p. 309–319, 2014.
OLIVEIRA, C. M. et al. Usina hidrelétrica de Belo Monte: percepções dos atores locais quanto aos impactos socioeconômicos e ambientais. Espacios, v. 37, n. 12, p. 1–9, 2016.
SAMPAIO, R. F.; MANCINI, M. C. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Rev. Bras. Fisioterapia. São Carlos, v. 11, n. 1, p. 83-89, Fev. 2007.
SÁNCHEZ, L. E. Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental: conceitos e métodos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos, 2020.
SANTOS, E. S.; DA CUNHA, A. C.; CUNHA, H. F. A. Hydroelectric power plant in the Amazon and socioeconomic impacts on Fishermen in Ferreira Gomes County – Amapá State. Ambiente e Sociedade, v. 20, n. 4, p. 191–207, 2017.
SANTOS, R. E. et al. Damming Amazon Rivers: environmental impacts of hydroelectric dams on Brazil’s Madeira River according to local fishers’ perception. Ambio, v. 49, n. 10, p. 1612–1628, 2020.
SHEN, H. et al. Impact analysis of karst reservoir construction on the surrounding environment: a case study for the southwest of China. Water (Switzerland), v. 11, n. 11, 2019.
SIERRA-CORREA, P. C.; CANTERA KINTZ, J. R. Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: a systematic review for mangrove coasts. Marine Policy, v. 51, p. 385–393, 2015.
TAJZIEHCHI, S. et al. Quantification of social impacts of large hydropower dams – a case study of alborz dam in mazandaran province, northern Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, v. 7, n. 2, p. 377–382, 2013.
TALAMINI, E. et al. Tendências e perspectivas do Novo Paradigma Ecológico: uma revisão sistemática da produção científica. Sustentabilidade em Debate, v. 8, n. 3, p. 84–99, 2017.
TALLMAN, P. S. et al. Ecosyndemics: the potential synergistic health impacts of highways and dams in the Amazon. Social Science and Medicine, n. May, p. 113037, 2020.
TOLMASQUIM, M. T.; GUERREIRO, A.; GORINI, R. Matriz energética Brasileira: uma prospectiva. Novos Estudos Cebrap, n. 79, p. 47–69, 2007.
VERONEZ, F.; MONTAÑO, M. Análise da qualidade dos estudos de impacto ambiental no estado do Espírito Santo (2007-2013). Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 43, p. 6–21, 2017.
VON SPERLING, E. Hydropower in Brazil: overview of positive and negative environmental aspects. Energy Procedia, v. 18, p. 110–118, 2012.
WANG, X. et al. Assessing impacts of a dam construction on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a mountain stream. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, v. 22, n. 1, p. 103–110, 2013.
YIN, R. K. Case Study Research: design and methods. 4. ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2009.
ZHANG, D.; HAN, D.; SONG, X. Impacts of the sanmenxia dam on the interaction between surface water and groundwater in the Lower Weihe River of Yellow River Watershed. Water (Switzerland), v. 12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
