Who pays the price? -Socio-ecological controversies regarding the energy transition in South America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n3.2022.44799Keywords:
Energy transition, Extractivism, Just transitions, Natural boundaries, Societal boundaries, South AmericaAbstract
Transformations linked to more sustainable energy and economic systems may have societal and ecological costs, which some people and territories must assume. Controversies might emerge associated with developing new productive chains, e.g., transition mineral activity. This study examines the relations among energy transition, society, and the environment, focusing on copper as a high-tech mineral and considering Bolivia, Chile, and Peru, three countries with mining-dependent economies.
This work tries to see if countries are becoming more renewable, efficient, and modern and if this correlates with copper activity and societal factors. As a result, Bolivia has pending tasks on both the energy demand and production sides. Despite presenting good performance on renewables and efficiency, Chile and Peru have pending tasks associated with the ecological distribution regarding mining and energy sectors. Mining-based economies might expose the fragility of green transitions in meeting sustainable goals considering equality, justice, and ecosystem care.
Downloads
References
ABDENUR, A. E. ¿Eludiendo o cortejando la controversia? La inversión extranjera directa (IED) china en las industrias extractivas de América Latina. Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement, n. 9, 10 out. 2017.
ADEKOYA, O. B. et al. Does oil connect differently with prominent assets during war? Analysis of intra-day data during the Russia-Ukraine saga. Resources Policy, v. 77, p. 102728, ago. 2022.
ALI, S. R. M. et al. The impacts of Covid-19 crisis on spillovers between the oil and stock markets: evidence from the largest oil importers and exporters. Economic Analysis and Policy, v. 73, p. 345–372, mar. 2022.
ANBLEYTH-EVANS, J. et al. Toxic violence in marine sacrificial zones: developing blue justice through marine democracy in Chile. Environment and Planning C: politics and space, p. 239965442210841, 16 maio 2022.
AVIS, W. Ukraine Crisis and Climate and Environment Commitments: K4D Helpdesk Report. Birmingham: Institute of Development Studies, 9 mar. 2022. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/ handle/20.500.12413/17419. Access in: 27 jun. 2022.
BOOKCHIN, M. Toward an ecological society. 1980.
BORDERA, J. et al. El efecto dominó. Guerra en Ucrania y extractivismos en América latina. 1. ed. Cochabamba,
Bolivia: LALIBRE Proyecto Editorial, 2022.
BORIC, G. Presidente de la República rinde la primera Cuenta Pública de su mandato. Gobierno de Chile. Available at: http://prensa.presidencia.cl/discurso.aspx?id=195328. Access in: 29 jun. 2022.
BRAND, U. et al. From planetary to societal boundaries: an argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: science, practice and policy, v. 17, n. 1, p. 264–291, 1 jan. 2021.
BROWN, B.; SPIEGEL, S. J. Coal, Climate Justice, and the Cultural Politics of Energy Transition. Global Environmental Politics, v. 19, n. 2, p. 149–168, maio 2019.
BUDDS, J. Power, nature and neoliberalism: the political ecology of water in Chile. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, v. 25, n. 3, p. 322–342, 26 nov. 2004.
CAIRO CAROU, H. Elementos para una geopolítica crítica: tradición y cambio en una disciplina maldita. Ería, n. 32, p. 195–213, 1993.
CALDERÓN, M.; PRIETO, M. La Cuestión agraria y el cobre en la Provincia de El Loa (1929/30 – 2006/07). Andes centro-sur, norte de Chile. Estudios Atacameños, 18 nov. 2020.
CALVO, G.; VALERO, A. Strategic mineral resources: availability and future estimations for the renewable energy sector. Environmental Development, p. 100640, abr. 2021.
CANADA. Copper facts. Government of Canada. Available at: https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/our-natural-resources/ minerals-mining/minerals-metals-facts/copper-facts/20506. Access in: 22 jul. 2022.
CAVALCANTI, C. Sustentabilidade: mantra ou escolha moral? Uma abordagem ecológico-econômica. Estudos Avançados, v. 26, n. 74, p. 35–50, 2012.
CECHIN, A. A natureza como limite da economia. A contribuição de Nicholas Georgescu-Rogen. 1. ed. São Paulo: Senac São Paulo, 2010.
CERECEDA-BALIC, F. et al. Understanding the role of anthropogenic emissions in glaciers retreat in the central Andes of Chile. Environmental Research, v. 214, p. 113756, nov. 2022.
CLEVELAND, C. J.; RUTH, M. When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process? A survey of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s contribution to ecological economics. Ecological Economics, v. 22, n. 3, p. 203–223, set. 1997.
COCHILCO. Producción Minera | Cochilco. Available at: https://www.cochilco.cl/Paginas/Estadisticas/Bases%20 de%20Datos/Producci%C3%B3n-Minera.aspx. Access in: 13 jul. 2022.
COONEY, P. Reprimarization: implications for the Environment and Development in Latin America. The cases of Argentina and Brazil . Review of Radical Political Economics, v. 48, n. 4, p. 553–561, dez. 2016.
CRONIN, J. et al. Embedding justice in the 1.5°C transition: a transdisciplinary research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, v. 1, p. 100001, ago. 2021.
DELGADO, J. O. Sociedades posneoliberales en América Latina y persistencia del extractivismo. Economía Informa, v. 396, p. 84–95, jan. 2016.
DIARIOUCHILE. Presidente Gabriel Boric anuncia cierre de Planta Ventanas de Codelco: “No queremos más zonas de sacrificio”. Diario y Radio Universidad Chile. Available at: https://radio.uchile.cl/2022/06/17/presidente- gabriel-boric-anuncia-cierre-de-planta-ventanas-de-codelco-no-queremos-mas-zonas-de-sacrificio/. Access in: 21 jul. 2022.
DUNLAP, A. The green economy as counterinsurgency, or the ontological power affirming permanent ecological catastrophe. Environmental Science & Policy, v. 139, p. 39–50, jan. 2023.
ERICSSON, M.; LÖF, O. Mining’s contribution to national economies between 1996 and 2016. Mineral Economics, v. 32, n. 2, p. 223–250, jul. 2019.
ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS. Ley Minera. Nueva Ley publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 26 de junio de 1992. 20 abr. 2022. Available at: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LMin.pdf.
FUENTEALBA, M. et al. The 2010–2020 “megadrought” drives reduction in lake surface area in the Andes of central Chile (32o - 36oS). Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, v. 38, p. 100952, dez. 2021.
GAYO, E. M. et al. A Cross-Cutting Approach for Relating Anthropocene, Environmental Injustice and Sacrifice Zones. Earth’s Future, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1–21, abr. 2022.
GROTTERA, C. Reducing emissions from the energy sector for a more resilient and low-carbon post-pandemic recovery in Latin America and the Caribbean. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (Eclac), 2022. Available at: https://www.cepal.org/pt-br/node/56102.
GUDYNAS, E. Extractivismos y corrupción: anatomía de una íntima relación. 1. ed. Lima, Perú. Montevideo, Uruguay: CooperAcción: Red GE, Red Peruana por una Globalizacíon con Equidad; Claes, Centro Latino Americano de Ecología Social, 2017.
GUZOWSKI, C.; MARTIN, M. M. I.; ZABALOY, M. F. Energy poverty: conceptualization and its link to exclusion. Brief review for Latin America. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 24, p. e00272, 2021.
HICKEL, J. The contradiction of the sustainable development goals: growth versus ecology on a finite planet. Sustainable Development, v. 27, n. 5, p. 873–884, set. 2019.
HICKEL, J.; HALLEGATTE, S. Can we live within environmental limits and still reduce poverty? Degrowth or decoupling? Development Policy Review, v. 40, n. 1, jan. 2022.
HOPE, J. Driving development in the Amazon: extending infrastructural citizenship with political ecology in Bolivia. Environment and Planning E: nature and space, v. 5, n. 2, p. 520–542, jun. 2022.
HUBER, M. Resource geography II: what makes resources political? Progress in Human Geography, v. 43, n. 3, p. 553–564, jun. 2019.
IEA. World Energy Outlook 2022. International Energy Agency, 2022a. Available at: www.iea.org. Access in: 1 nov. 2022 IEA. World – World Energy Balances: overview – analysis. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-
energy-balances-overview/world. Access in: 3 nov. 2022b.
IEA. Securing Clean Energy Technology Supply Chains. Australia: International Energy Agency, 2022c. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ac24282b-c3d6-4b0e-a0c3-de948a0af104/ SecuringCleanEnergyTechnologySupplyChains.pdf.
IGLESIAS, E. M.; RIVERA-ALONSO, D. Brent and WTI oil prices volatility during major crises and Covid-19. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 211, p. 110182, 1 abr. 2022.
INE. Producción de minerales por tipo de mineral según año y mes 1990-2022. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2022. Available at: https://www.ine.gob.bo/index.php/estadisticas-economicas/hidrocarburos-mineria/mineria- cuadros-estadisticos/.
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/. Access in: 14 abr. 2022
IRARRAZAVAL, F. Contesting uneven development: the political geography of natural gas rents in Peru and Bolivia. Political Geography, v. 79, p. 102161, maio 2020.
IRENA. IRENA – International Renewable Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.irena.org/. Access in: 30 jul. 2022. IWI?SKA, K.; LIS, A.; M?CZKA, K. From framework to boundary object? Reviewing gaps and critical trends in
global energy justice research. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 79, p. 102191, set. 2021.
KNOX, S. et al. The (in)justices of smart local energy systems: a systematic review, integrated framework, and
future research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 83, p. 102333, jan. 2022. LEFF, E. Tiempo de sustentabilidad. Ambiente & Sociedade, n. 6, p. 10, 2000.
LEFF, E. Ecologia Política: uma perspectiva latino-americana. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 27, n. 0, 28 jun. 2013.
LINERA, Á. G. La política como disputa de las esperanzas. 1. ed. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Clacso, 2022. MACROTRENDS. Copper Prices – 45 Year Historical Chart. Macrotrends, 2022. Available at: https://www.
macrotrends.net/1476/copper-prices-historical-chart-data.
MARQUES, L. O Antropoceno como aceleração do aquecimento global. Liinc em Revista, v. 18, n. 1, p. e5968, 4 abr. 2022.
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. Ecología política del extractivismo y justicia socio-ambiental. INTERdisciplina, v. 3, n. 7, 20 set. 2015.
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. A global environmental justice movement: mapping ecological distribution conflicts. Disjuntiva. Crítica de les Ciències Socials, v. 1, n. 2, p. 83, 2 jul. 2020.
MARTINEZ-ALIER, J. et al. Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 43, n. 3, p. 731–755, 3 maio 2016.
MARTINEZ-ALIER, J. Circularity, entropy, ecological conflicts and LFFU. Local Environment, v. 27, n. 10–11, p. 1182–1207, 2 nov. 2022.
MAX-NEEF, M. The World on a Collision Course and the Need for a New Economy: contribution to the 2009 Royal Colloquium. Ambio, v. 39, n. 3, p. 200–210, maio 2010.
MEADOWS, D. H. et al. The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972.
MEYER, E.; VILSMAIER, U. Economistic discourses of sustainability: determining moments and the question of alternatives. Sustentabilidade em Debate, v. 11, n. 1, p. 98–124, 30 abr. 2020.
MINISTERIO DE ENERGÍA Y MINAS. Producción minera metálica, por principales metales 1980-2020. Ministerio de Energía y Minas. Dirección General de Promoción y Sostenibilidad Minera, 2022. Available at: https://www. inei.gob.pe/estadisticas/indice-tematico/economia/.
NETTLETON, D. Chapter 6 – Selection of Variables and Factor Derivation. In: NETTLETON, D. (Ed.). Commercial Data Mining. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014. p. 79–104.
OLADE. Sielac – Sistema de Información Energética de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Available at: http://sier.olade. org. Access in: 3 jun. 2021a.
OLADE. Panorama Energético de América Latina y el Caribe 2021. 2. ed. Quito, Ecuador: Olade, 2022b.
POQUE GONZÁLEZ, A. B. Transição energética para a sustentabilidade no Chile e no Brasil: oportunidades e desafios decorrentes da pandemia por Covid-19. Latin American Journal of Energy Research, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1–21, 11 jul. 2021.
POQUE GONZÁLEZ, A. B.; SILVA, B. D. J.; MACIA, Y. M. Transición energética en América Latina y el Caribe: diálogos inter y transdisciplinarios en tiempos de pandemia por Covid-19. Lider, v. 39, p. 33–61, 15 mar. 2022.
ROCKSTRÖM, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, v. 461, n. 7263, p. 472–475, set. 2009. SANTOS, T. DOS. A estrutura da dependência. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política, v. 1, n. 30,
SATOH, Y. et al. The timing of unprecedented hydrological drought under climate change. Nature Communications, v. 13, n. 1, p. 3287, dez. 2022.
SERNAGEOMIN. Anuario de la mineria de Chile 2020. Chile: Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, 2021.
SEVILLANO, E. G. Alemania anuncia que recurrirá al carbón ante el recorte de suministro de gas ruso. Available at: https://elpais.com/economia/2022-06-19/alemania-recurrira-al-carbon-ante-el-recorte-de-suministro-de- gas-ruso.html. Access in: 29 jun. 2022.
SLOAN, G.; GRAY, C. S. Why geopolitics? Journal of Strategic Studies, v. 22, n. 2–3, p. 1–11, jun. 1999.
STEFFEN, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, v. 347, n.
, p. 1259855, 13 fev. 2015.
SVAMPA, M. Feminismos ecoterritoriales en América Latina. Entre la violencia patriarcal y extractivista y la interconexión con la naturaleza. Madrid, España: Fundación Carolina, out. 2021. Available at: https://www. fundacioncarolina.es/dt_fc_59/. Access in: 3 dez. 2021.
TAPIA-GATICA, J. et al. Advanced determination of the spatial gradient of human health risk and ecological risk from exposure to As, Cu, Pb, and Zn in soils near the Ventanas Industrial Complex (Puchuncaví, Chile). Environmental Pollution, v. 258, p. 113488, mar. 2020.
TEMPER, L.; BENE, D. DEL; MARTINEZ-ALIER, J. Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas. Journal of Political Ecology, v. 22, n. 1, p. 255–278, 30 nov. 2015.
ULLOA, A. Dinámicas ambientales y extractivas en el siglo XXI: ¿es la época del Antropoceno o del Capitaloceno en Latinoamérica? Desacatos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n. 54, p. 58, 16 maio 2017.
UN. Cepalstat – Bases de Datos y Publicaciones Estadísticas. Available at: https://statistics.cepal.org/portal/ cepalstat/dashboard.html?theme=2&lang=es. Access in: 3 dez. 2021.
VERGARA-PERUCICH, F.; BOANO, C. The big bang of neoliberal urbanism: the gigantomachy of Santiago’s urban development. Environment and Planning C: politics and space, v. 39, n. 1, p. 184–203, fev. 2021.
VILLALBA-EGUILUZ, C. U.; ETXANO, I. Buen Vivir vs Development (II): the limits of (Neo-) extractivism. Ecological Economics, v. 138, p. 1–11, ago. 2017.
VOSKOBOYNIK, D. M.; ANDREUCCI, D. Greening extractivism: environmental discourses and resource governance in the ‘Lithium Triangle’. Environment and Planning E: nature and space, v. 5, n. 2, p. 787–809, jun. 2022.
WORLD BANK. World Development Indicators – DataBank. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD/1ff4a498/Popular-Indicators#. Access in: 13 jul. 2022.
ZOGRAFOS, C.; ROBBINS, P. Green Sacrifice Zones, or Why a Green New Deal Cannot Ignore the Cost Shifts of Just Transitions. One Earth, v. 3, n. 5, p. 543–546, nov. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
