Naming and Order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v8i2.28966Keywords:
Conservatism; extreme center; left; order; rightAbstract
Inspired by Kripke’s distinction between the concepts of analyticity and apriority though the auxiliary concept of necessity, the central thesis of the present paper is that there are more kinds of political attitudes than expected; the lack of some of these in the political spectrum comes from a deep confusion between the concepts of right and conservatism. Furthermore, the separation between two kinds of order ”“ economical and moral, will justify the more original attitudes of ‘left conservatism’ and ‘right progressism’ whilst accounting for the more ambiguous notions of political centers and extremes. Finally, a comparison between political values and logical values ”“ truth and falsity, will allow an explanation of the ambivalent attitudes ‘left and right at once’ and ‘neither left nor right’ either as cases of conceptual confusions or as a collapse of the political discourse into ‘extreme center’.
Downloads
References
BOBBIO, N. Direita e esquerda. Razões e significados de uma distinção política. Ed. UNESP, 1994.
CLOUSCARD, M. Néo-fascisme et idéologie du désir : Mai 1968, la contre-révolution libérale. Ed. Broché, 2008.
DE BENOIST, A. Droite-gauche c’est fini! Le moment populiste, Ed. Broché, 2017.
DENAULT, A. Politiques de l’extrême centre, éditions Lux, collection Lettres Libres, 2017.
ENGELS, F. & MARX, K. A ideologia alemã, 1845-1846, tradução de José Carlos Bruni e Marco Aurélio Nogueira, 9a edição, ed. Ciências Humanas, São Paulo, 1993.
GIDDENS, A. A Terceira Via e seus Críticos. Rio de Janeiro, Record, 2001.
GOODMAN, N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, MA : Harvard UP, 1955
HINTIKKA, J. “Epistemic logic and the methods of philosophical analysis”, Australasian of Philosophy, Vol. 46, 1968, pp. 37-51.
ISABEL, T. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. L’anarchie sans le désordre. Ed. Autrement, 2017.
JULLIARD, J. Les gauches françaises (1762-2012). Histoire, politique et imaginaire, Ed. Broché 2012.
KANT, I. Crítica da razão pura. Ed. Vozes, 2015.
KRIPKE, S. O nomear e a necessidade. Ed. Gradiva, 2012.
LOTY, L. “Islamisme, laïcité féministe et ultra-libéralisme”. In : La modernité discutée (Textes offerts à Pierre-André Taguieff), CNRS Editions, 2019, pp. 391-402.
MOUFFE, C. Pour un populisme de gauche. Ed. Broché, 2018.
QUINE, W.V.O. “Os dois dogmas do empirismo”. In : Ryle et al. Coleção os Pensadores : Vol. LII. São Paulo : Abril S.A. Cultural e Industrial, 1975, pp. 237-254.
QUINE, W.V.O. Philosophy of Logic. Harvard Univ. Press (2a ed.), 1986.
RÉMOND, R. Les droites en France. Ed. Aubier- Montaigne, Paris, 1954.
SALANSKIS, J.-M. La gauche et l’égalité, Collection Intervention philosophique, 2009.
SCHANG, F. “Non-Epicurean desires”, Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), 2016, pp. 63-68.
SCHANG, F. “Le ninisme est-il un nihilisme ?”, Implications Philosophiques, 2015, http ://www.implications-philosophiques.org/actualite/une/le-ninisme-est-il-un-nihilisme/
SCHANG, F. “Left Nazism ? Right expressivism!” (esboço).
SCHANG, F. “Uma análise operacional da distinção esquerda-direita”. In Anais do 1o Fórum de Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2019, pp. 135-155
STERNHELL, Z. Ni droite ni gauche, l’idéologie fasciste en France, Folio Histoire, 2012.
VRANAS, P. “Logic of Imperatives”. In The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Hugh LaFollette (ed.), 2015, pp. 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.