Perception of the socio-environmental impacts caused by wind generators in the state of Piauí, Northeast of Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n3.2023.50457Keywords:
Social impacts, Wind energy , Procedural justice , Distributive justice , PerceptionAbstract
The expansion of wind energy in Brazil has brought benefits, but many conflicts have arisen around rural communities. The research involved understanding the community's responses regarding the acceptance or rejection of wind farms in the Serra dos Pereiros community in Piauí from the procedural and distributive justice view. A questionnaire with ten answers was applied, which added together 31 variables. In statical analyses, with a population sample of 69 people, the Likert scale, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs) were used. From the results, 5 responses presented moderate positive or strongly positive correlations: change in the landscape, opinion about wind farms, political process for implementing wind farms, fairness of the process, and compensation. The data show that the development of policies that do not include the direct participation of society generates conflicts between the different institutional levels and significant local environmental and social problems.
Downloads
References
ABEEÓLICA – Brazilian Wind Energy Association. ‘No sertão do Nordeste, Casa dos Ventos inaugura um dos maiores complexos eólicos da América Latina’. June 12, 2017. Available in: https://abeeolica.org.br/no-sertao- -do-nordeste-casa-dos-ventos-inaugura-um-dos-maiores-complexos-eolicos-da-america-latina/. Access in: Fe- bruary 23, 2020.
ABEEÓLICA – Brazilian Wind Energy Association. ‘Energia Eólica: os bons ventos do Brasil’. October 22, 2020. Avai- lable in: http://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Infovento-18.pdf. Access in: February 23, 2021.
ABEEÓLICA – Brazilian Wind Energy Association ‘Boletim anual 2022’. Available in: https://abeeolica.org.br/wp- -content/uploads/2023/06/Boletim-de-Geracao-Eolica-2022.pdf. Access in: August 10, 2023.
ANCHUSTEGUI, I. H. Distributive justice, community benefits and renewable energy: the case of offshore wind projects. University of Bergen, Faculty of Law. October 29, 2020.
ANEEL. ‘Sistema de Informações Geográficas do Setor Elétrico’. SIGEL, 2022. Available in: https://sigel.aneel.gov. br/portal/home/. Access in: September 10, 2022.
BELL, D.; GRAY, T.; HAGGETT, C. The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environ. Politics, v. 14, n. 4, p. 460-477, 2005.
BELL, D. et al. Re-visiting the 'social gap': public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environ. Politics, v. 22, n. 1, p.115-135, 2013.
BRANNSTROM, C. et al. What explains the community acceptance of wind energy? Exploring benefits, consulta- tion, and livelihoods in coastal Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 83, p. 1-13, 2022.
BRANNSTROM, C. ‘Distribuição com Justiça? Conceitos e Abordagens. Descarbonização na América do Sul: cone- xões entre o Brasil e a Argentina’. Editions EERN, Mossoró, RN. 2022.
BRASIL. National Council of the Environment. ‘Resolução 462, de 24 de julho de 2014’. Available in: https://www. ibama.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view= legislacao& legislacao=133565#:~:text=Estabelece%20procedimen-
ISSN-e 2179-9067
Sustainability in Debate - Brasília, v. 14, n.3, p. 52-69, dez/2023
Perception of the socio-environmental impacts caused by wind generators in the state of Piauí, Northeast of Brazil
tos%20para%20o %20licenciameto,fonte%20e%C3%B3lica%20em%20superf%C3%ADcie%20terrestre.Access in: May 30, 2020.
DEVINE-WRIGHT, P. Beyond NIMBYism: toward an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, v. 8, p.125–191, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124.
DEVINE-WRIGHT, P. Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. WIREs, Clim. Change, v. 2, n. 1, p. 19–26, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.v2.110.1002/ wcc.89.
DEVORE, J. L. ‘Probabilidade e Estatística para Engenharia e Ciências’. Editor Cengage. 9o edit. 656 p. 2018. FRATE, C. A. et al. Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: a case from Rio
Grande do Norte, Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 132, p. 185–195, 2019.
GASPAR, I. DE. A.; SHIMOYA, A. ‘Avaliação da Confiabilidade de uma Pesquisa utilizando o Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach’. Production Engineering Symposium. Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão. Catalão, Goiás, Brasil. From 09 to 11, August, 2017.
GIANNETTI, B. F. Cleaner production for achieving the sustainable development goals. 2020. J. Clean. Prod., v. 271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122127, 122127.
GORAYEB, A.; BRANNSTROM, C. 'Licenciamento Ambiental e Oposição Social à Energia Eólica: estudo de caso com foco no social gap em comunidade litorânea do Ceará, Brasil'. Magazine of Geography (Recife). v. 37, no. 3, 2020.
GORAYEB, A.; BRANNSTROM, C. ‘Impactos socioambientais da implantação dos parques de energia eólica no Brasil. Diretrizes para o Planejamento Socialmente Justo com Vistas à Implantação de Parques Eólicos no Brasil’. Fortaleza: Editions UFC, 2019.
GORAYEB, A.; BRANNSTROM, C. ‘Caminhos para uma Gestão Participativa dos Recursos Energéticos de Matriz Renovável (Parques Eólicos) no Nordeste do Brasil’. Mercator, Fortaleza, v.15, n.1, p. 101-115, jan./mar., 2016.
GROSS, C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fair- ness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, v. 35, p. 2727–2736, 2007. DOI: https://doi.or- g/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
HALL, N.; WRIGHT, P. D. Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across. Australian case studies, v. 58, July 2013, p. 200-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009.
LEITE, N. S. ‘Respostas de Comunidades ao Desenvolvimento da Energia Eólica no Litoral do Ceará, Brasil’. 2019. 257 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Geography) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, 2019.
MONTEFUSCO, C.; SANTOS, M. J.; SANTOS, J. R. C. ‘Energia Eólica e ODS: uma análise dos níveis de evidenciação socioambiental no Rio Grande do Norte/Brasil’. Socioeconomic Development in Debate Magazine – RSSD. RDSD v. 6 n. 3 (2020), Special Number IV CRIARS 03-17p.
PASQUALETTI, M. J. Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., v. 101, n. 4, p. 907-917, 2011a.
PASQUALETTI, M. J. Social barriers to renewable energy landscapes. Geogr. Rev., v. 101, n. 2, p. 201-223, 2011b. RAND, J.; HOEN, B. Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: what have we learned?
Energy Res. Soc. Sci, v. 29, p. 135-148, 2017.
SILVA JÚNIOR, S. D.; COSTA, F. J. Measurement and Verification Scales: a comparative analysis between the likert and phrase completion scales. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisas de Marketing, Opinião e Mídia, 2014.
SIMCOCK, N. Procedural justice and the implementation of community windenergy projects: a case study from South Yorkshire, UK. Land Use Policy, v. 59, p. 467–477, 2016.
WALKER, C. J. R. Wind energy policy, development, and justice in Ontario and Nova Scotia, Canada: a compari- son of technocratic and community-based siting processes" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4696.
WALKER, C.; BAXTER, J. "It's easy to throw rocks at a corporation": wind energy development and distributive justice in Canada. J. Environ. Policy Plan., v. 19, n. 6, p. 754-768, 2017a.
WALKER, C.; BAXTER, J. Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: a comparison of community- -based and technocratic siting processes. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., v. 29, p. 160-169, 2017b.
WOLSINK, M. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public su- pport. Renew. Energy, v. 21, p. 49–64, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5.
WOLSINK, M. Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of 'ba- ckyard motives'. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., v. 11, p. 1188–1207, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2005.10.005.
WÜSTENHAGEN, R.; WOLSINK, M.; BÜRER, M. J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduc- tion to the concept. Energy Policy, v. 35, p. 2683–2691, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
YUN, S. J. et al. Local residents' attitudes about wind farms and associated noise annoyance in South Korea. Energy Policy, v. 163, p. 112847, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
