Determinantes das cidades empreendedoras brasileiras: uma análise a partir do ranking da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-20254001e51881

Palavras-chave:

Cidade empreendedora, Empreendedorismo, Educação Empreendedora, Capital humano, Gestão Municipal

Resumo

 Este estudo busca identificar os fatores que impulsionam cidades empreendedoras no Brasil, analisando o ranking elaborado pela Escola Nacional de Administração Pública utilizando o Índice de Cidades Empreendedoras. Foram realizadas análises de correlação e regressão utilizando o método dos mínimos quadrados ordinários. Os resultados indicaram que a proporção de Microempreendedores Individuais, a educação voltada ao empreendedorismo e o número de graduados em ensino superior são fatores que exercem uma influência positiva sobre as cidades empreendedoras. No entanto, a gestão municipal não apresentou nenhuma influência sobre elas. Os resultados mostraram os níveis de empreendedorismo e educação que alicerçam os ecossistemas municipais em empreendedorismo, bem como apontaram a ausência de influência da gestão municipal no índice de cidades empreendedoras, o que poderá comprometer a infraestrutura desses ecossistemas. Este estudo avança na compreensão dos impulsionadores de cidades empreendedoras no Brasil, apresentando, assim, uma contribuição teórica para o estudo de ecossistemas de empreendedorismo no contexto de países emergentes.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Marcos Aurélio Brambilla, Universidade  Cesumar  (Unicesumar)

Professor  do  Programa  de  Pós-Graduação  em  Gestão  do  Conhecimento  nas  Organizações  da  Universidade  Cesumar  (Unicesumar), PR, Brasil. Doutor  em  Teoria  Econômica  pela  Universidade  Estadual  de  Maringá. 

Hilka Pelizza Vier Machado, Universidade Cesumar - Unicesumar

Professora Titular da Universidade Cesumar (UniCesumar), PR, Brasil. Doutora em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Referências

AGASISTI, T.; BERTOLETTI, A. Higher education and economic growth: A longitudinal study of european regions 2000–2017. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 81, 2022.

ALVI, F. H.; ULRICH, K. Innovation finance ecosystems for entrepreneurial firms: A conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Business Research, v. 156, Feb. 2023.

ANTONIALLI, D. M.; KIRA, B. Planejamento urbano do futuro, dados do presente: A proteção da privacidade no contexto das cidades inteligentes. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, v. 22, p. 1–25, 2020.

AUDRETSCH, D. B.; HEGER, D.; VEITH, T. Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, v. 44, n. 2, p. 219–230, 2015.

AUDRETSCH, D. B.; BELITSKI, M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 42, p. 1030–1051, Oct. 2017.

BASCO, R. Family business and regional development: A theoretical model of regional familiness. Journal of Family Business Strategy, v. 6, n. 4, p. 259–271, 2015.

BERJANI, D.; BURG, E. V.; VERDUIJN, K. Discursive threads in entrepreneurship policy texts: A comparative analysis between the netherlands and kosovo. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, v. 35, n. 3-4, p. 297–316, 2023.

CARVALHO, N. R. O fracasso do empreendedorismo urbano em terras patrimonialistas-o rio de janeiro dos megaeventos e os limites da neoliberalização periférica. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, v. 25, n. 1, 2023.

CASSOL, A. et al. Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions and the moderation of entrepreneurial education: A study of the brazilian context. The International Journal of Management Education, v. 20, n. 3, 2022.

CENCI, J. J.; MACHADO, H. P. V.; CARVALHO, C. E. Microempreendedores individuais que querem crescer estão alerta a oportunidades? Brazilian Business Review, v. 19, p. 546–564, 2022.

CONSELHO FEDERAL DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO. IGM-CFA Disponível em: <https://igm.cfa.org.br/bi/>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2023.

CHAN, R. C. K.; LI, L. Entrepreneurial city and the restructuring of urban space in shanghai expo. Urban Geography, v. 38, n. 5, p. 666–686, 2017.

CHEN, J. J. et al. External enablement of new venture creation: An exploratory, query-driven assessment of china’s high-speed rail expansion. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 35, n. 6, 2020.

CRAVO, T. A.; GOURLAY, A.; BECKER, B. SMEs and regional economic growth in brazil. Small Business Economics, v. 38, p. 217–230, 2012.

DAVIDSSON, P.; RECKER, J.; BRIEL, F. V. External enablement of new venture creation: A framework. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 34, n. 3, p. 311–332, 2020.

DOUCET, B. Variations of the entrepreneurial city: Goals, roles and visions in rotterdam’s kop van zuid and the glasgow harbour megaprojects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, v. 37, n. 6, p. 2035–2051, 2013.

DUSCHL, M. Firm dynamics and regional resilience: An empirical evolutionary perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 25, n. 5, p. 867–883, Oct. 2016.

ENAP. Escola nacional de administração pública: Índice de cidades empreendedoras 2022 Disponível em: <https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/6880/1/ICE2022_Atualizado-com-errata.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2023.

EYNOLGHOZAT, M.; ZIYAE, B.; REZVANI, M. IoT-based entrepreneurial city: A new model of urban governance to achieve economic sustainability. Kybernetes, 2023.

FARINHA, L. et al. Entrepreneurial dynamics and government policies to boost entrepreneurship performance. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 72, 2020.

FERNANDES, A. J.; FERREIRA, J. J. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and networks: A literature review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, v. 16, n. 1, p. 189–247, 2022.

FISCHER, M. M.; NIJKAMP, P. Handbook of regional science 2. ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2021.

GARCÉS-VELÁSTEGUI, P. Development in latin america: Political economies as a matter of culture. Revista Sociedade e Estado, v. 37, n. 3, p. 931–954, 2022.

GREENE, W. H. Econometric analysis Noida: Pearson Education India, 2003.

GUILHERME, R. C.; REIS, C. N. Plano estratégico de ação social do MERCOSUL: A transferência de renda em contexto de ofensiva neoliberal. Katálysis, v. 21, n. 1, p. 108–124, 2018.

HARIMA, A. et al. Entrepreneurship? Let us do it later: Procrastination in the intention–behavior gap of student entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, v. 27, n. 5, p. 1189–1213, 2021.

HENNING, M.; MCKELVEY, M. Knowledge, entrepreneurship and regional transformation: Contributing to the schumpeterian and evolutionary perspective on the relationships between them. Small Business Economics, v. 54, p. 495–501, 2020.

HENREKSON, M.; SANANDAJI, T. Measuring entrepreneurship: Do established metrics capture schumpeterian entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 44, n. 4, p. 733–760, 2020.

INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS SUPERIORES DA EMPRESA. Cities in motion index 2015 Disponível em: <https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0366-E.pdf>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2023.

ISENBERG, D. J. How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, v. 88, n. 6, p. 40–50, 2010.

JIANG, Y.; WALEY, P. Who builds cities in china? How urban investment and development companies have transformed shanghai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, v. 44, n. 4, p. 636–651, 2020.

JOKELA, S. Transformative city branding and the evolution of the entrepreneurial city: The case of "brand new helsinki". Urban Studies Journal, v. 57, n. 10, p. 2031–2046, 2019.

JUSTEN, A.; BRAGA, W. P.; GURGEL, C. Reprimarização, política pública do trabalho e superexploração no brasil: Revisitando ruy mauro marini. Katálisis, v. 26, n. 3, p. 405–415, 2023.

KANTIS, H.; FEDERICO, J. S.; GARCÍA, S. I. Entrepreneurship policy and systemic conditions: Evidence-based implications and recommendations for emerging countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 72, 2020.

KOURTIT, K.; NIJKAMP, P.; STEENBRUGGEN, J. The significance of digital data systems for smart city policy. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 58, p. 13–21, 2017.

KRISHNA, R.; KUMMITHA, R. Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 149, 2019.

KUYUMJIAN, R.; SOUZA, E. M. D.; SANT’ANNA, S. R. D. Uma análise a respeito do desenvolvimento local: O empreendedorismo social no morro do jaburu-vitória (ES), brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 48, p. 1503–1524, 2014.

KVILVANG, N.; BJURSTRÖM, E.; ALMQVIST, R. Making sense of complexity in governance: The case of local public management in the city of stockholm. Policy Studies, v. 41, n. 6, p. 623–640, 2020.

LANGE, B.; SCHMIDT, S. Entrepreneurial ecosystems as a bridging concept? A conceptual contribution to the debate on entrepreneurship and regional development. Growth and Change, v. 52, n. 2, p. 790–807, 2021.

LASPITA, S. et al. Founder or employee? The effect of social factors and the role of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Research, v. 155, 2023.

LAUERMAN, J. Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Human Geography, v. 42, n. 2, p. 205–224, 2018.

LUO, Y.; SHEN, J. Urban entrepreneurialism, meta governance, and "space of innovation". Evidence from buildings for innovative industries in shenzen, china. Cities, v. 131, 2022.

MACHADO, H. P. V. et al. Ecossistemas empreendedores: Dinâmica e avaliação. Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade, v. 19, n. 58, p. 124–143, 2023.

MALECKI, E. J. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, v. 12, n. 3, 2018.

MAROUFKHANI, P.; WAGNER, R.; ISMAIL, W. K. W. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic review. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 545–564, 2018.

MARTÍNEZ-GREGORIO, S.; BADENES-RIBERA, L.; OLIVER, A. Effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship intention and related outcomes in educational contexts: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Management Education, v. 19, n. 3, 2021.

MASON, C.; BROWN, R. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship Paris: OECD, 2014.

MIÖRNER, J. Contextualizing agency in new path development: How system selectivity shapes regional reconfiguration capacity. Regional Studies, v. 56, n. 4, p. 592–604, 2022.

MORRIS, M. H.; NEUMEYER, X.; KURATKO, D. F. A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics, v. 45, p. 713–728, 2015.

MOUTINHO, R. et al. Beyond the "innovation’s black-box": Translating r&d outlays into employment and economic growth. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 50, p. 45–58, 2015.

NAKAMURA, H. Evaluating the value of an entrepreneurial city with a spatial hedonic approach: A case study of london. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 71, 2020.

RIOS, V.; GIANMOENA, L. The link between quality of government and regional resilience in europe. Journal of Policy Modeling, v. 42, n. 5, p. 1064–1084, 2020.

RIZZI, P.; GRAZIANO, P.; DALLARA, A. A capacity approach to territorial resilience: The case of european regions. Annals of Regional Science, v. 60, n. 2, p. 285–328, 2018.

ROUNDY, P.; BRADSHAW, B.; BROCHEN, B. The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, v. 86, p. 1–10, 2018.

ROUNDY, P. T.; BURKE-SMALLEY, L. Leveraging entrepreneurial ecosystems as human resource systems: A theory of meta-organizational human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, v. 32, n. 4, 2022.

SERVIÇO BRASILEIRO DE APOIO ÀS MICRO E PEQUENAS EMPRESAS. Índice sebrae de desenvolvimento econômico local - acervo Disponível em: <https://www.isdel-sebrae.com/>. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2023.

SHAKIBA, H.; DELANGIZAN, S.; MOHAMADIFAR, Y. Inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem policies: An application of the meta‐synthesis approach. Poverty & Public Policy, v. 14, n. 4, p. 342–380, 2022.

SHANE, S. Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, v. 33, p. 141–149, 2009.

SHWETZER, C.; MARITZ, A.; NGUYEN, Q. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic and dynamic approach. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, v. 1, n. 2, p. 79–95, 2019.

SPIGEL, B. The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, v. 41, n. 1, p. 49–72, 2017.

SPIGEL, B.; HARRISON, R. Towards a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 151–168, 2018.

STAM, E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, v. 23, n. 9, p. 1759–1769, 2015.

STAM, E.; VEN, A. VAN DE. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements Small Business Economics, v. 56, n. 2, p. 809–832, Feb. 2021.

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6

SVOBODA, O.; KLEMENTOVA, T. Correlation analysis and model of the regional economic resilience. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, v. 11, p. 765–777, 2014.

VEKIĆ, A.; BOROCKI, J.; FAJSI, A. Development of entrepreneurial ecosystem through university’s new companies. Management Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, v. 24, n. 3, p. 33–47, 2019.

WU, F. The (post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai’s reglobalisation in question. Urban Studies, v. 40, n. 9, p. 1673–1698, 2003.

XIAO, Y.; DRUCKER, J. Does economic diversity enhance regional disaster resilience? Journal of the American Planning Association, v. 79, n. 2, p. 148–160, 2013.

» https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2013.882125

ZHANG, Y.; ROELFSEMA, H. Entrepreneurial ecosystems, new business formation, and scale-up activity: Evidence from 286 chinese cities. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, v. 12, n. 4, p. 559–595, 2022.

ZHENG, J. Creative industry clusters’ and the ’entrepreneurial city’ of shanghai. Urban Studies, v. 48, n. 16, p. 3561–3582, 2011.

ZIYAE, B.; REZVANI, M.; EYNOLGHOZAT, M. Co-opetition in entrepreneurial city: An approach to complexity theory. Cities, v. 121, 2022.

Downloads

Publicado

17-06-2025

Como Citar

Brambilla, M. A., & Machado, H. P. V. (2025). Determinantes das cidades empreendedoras brasileiras: uma análise a partir do ranking da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. Sociedade E Estado, 40(01), e51881. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-20254001e51881

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.