Reflections on the heritagisation of intangible cultural heritage:
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v1i2.7177Keywords:
Patrimonialization on the network. intangible cultural heritage. network society.Abstract
The constitution of the cultural heritage has been approached from different angles, proposing existing actors and power relations. In the case of intangible heritage, it is important to understand heritagisation processes such as the construction of meaning and meaning of cultural elements, through the assignment of values, that cultural agents do with certain purposes; as well as a reflection of the global society. In this sense, it is possible to speak of a network heritagisation, in which diverse actors converge in a system organized in networks, nodes and flows. Networks or links that connect or not to actors, with interconnected nodes with greater or lesser importance; where what flows are values, interests and meanings that connect or disconnect actors, a network that is always in continuous reconfiguration.
Downloads
References
Amengual, G. (2008). Pérdida de la experiencia y ruptura de la tradición. La experiencia en el pensamiento de Walter Benjamin. In Amengual, G., Cabot, M., Vermal, J. L. (Eds.). Ruptura de la tradición. Estudios sobre Walter Benjamin y Martin Heidegger (pp. 29-59). Madrid: Trotta.
Amescua, C. (2011). Análisis regional de las proclamaciones de Obras Maestras del Patrimonio Oral e Inmaterial de la Humanidad. In Arizpe, L. (Coord.). Compartir el patrimonio cultural inmaterial: narrativas y representaciones (pp. 103-128). México: Dirección General de Culturas Populares/CONACULTA-Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias-UNAM.
Appadurai, A. (1999). Soberanía sin territorialidad. Notas para una geografía posnacional. In Nueva Sociedad, (pp. 109-124).
________. (2013). El rechazo de las minorías. México: Tusquets Editores.
Arizpe, L. (2006). Culturas en movimiento. Interactividad cultural y procesos globales. México: Cámara de Diputados, LIX Legislatura-UNAM/CRIM-Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
________. (2011a). El patrimonio cultural inmaterial de México. Ritos y festividades. México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa-CRIM/UNAM.
________. (2011b) (Coord.). Compartir el patrimonio cultural inmaterial: narrativas y representaciones México: DGCP/CONACULTA-CRIM-UNAM.
Bauman, Z. (2004). Modernidad líquida. Argentina: FCE.
________. (2015). La globalización: consecuencias humanas. México: FCE.
Bondaz, J., Isnart, C., & Leblon A. (2012) Au-delà du consensus patrimonial: Résistances et usages contestataires du patrimoine. Civilisations, (61, pp. 9-22).
Bonfil, G. (2004). Implicaciones éticas del sistema de control cultural. In Olivé, L. (Comp.). Ética y diversidad cultural (pp.-). México: FCE.
Bortolotto, C. (2011). Le trouble du patrimoine culturel immatériel. In Bortolotto, C. (Ed.). Le patrimoine culturel immatériel. Enjeux d’une nouvelle catégorie (pp.21-43). Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Boym, S. (2015). El futuro de la nostalgia. España: A. Machado Libros.
Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. España: Alianza Editorial.
Choay, F. (2007). Alegoría del patrimonio cultural. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Deacon, H., Dondolo, L., Mrubata, M., & Prosalendis, S. (2004). The subtle power of intangible heritage: Legal and financial instruments for safeguarding intangible heritage. South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council Publishers.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2016). Rizoma. México: Fontamara.
Duvelle, C. (2011). Los instrumentos normativos internacionales de la UNESCO sobre la cultura: una mirada al pasado, una mirada al futuro. In Arizpe, L. (Coord.). Compartir el patrimonio cultural inmaterial: narrativas y representaciones (pp.15-24). México: DGCP/CONACULTA-CRIM-UNAM.
Grenet, S., & Hottin, C. (2011). Avant-propos. Un livre politique. In Bortolotto, C. (Ed.). Le patrimoine culturel immatériel. Enjeux d’une nouvelle catégorie (pp.9-19). Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage. Critical approaches. Estados Unidos: Routledge.
Huyssen, A. (2002). En busca del futuro perdido. Cultura y memoria en tiempos de globalización. México: FCE.
Jurado, M. E. (2001). Xantolo: el retorno de los muertos. México: FONCA/CONACULTA.
Kearney, A. (2009). Intangible cultural Heritage. Global awareness and local interest. In Smith, L. Akagawa, N. (Eds.). Intangible Heritage (pp. 209-225). Estados Unidos: Routledge.
Lara, J. (2013). ¡Cuahuehue tlaquastecapantlalli! La Danza de Cuanegros. Testimonio Musical de México, 60. México: INAH.
Lomnitz, Claudio (2013). Idea de la muerte en México. México: FCE.
Mosterín, J. (1993). Filosofía de la cultura. España: Alianza Editorial.
Prats, L. (1997). Antropología y patrimonio. España: Ariel.
________. (2005). Concepto y gestión del patrimonio local. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, (21), 17-35.
Rowlands, M. & de Jong, F. (2009) Reconsidering heritage and memory. In de Jong, F. & Rowlands, M. (Eds.). Reclaming heritage: alternative imaginaries of memory in West Africa (pp.13-29). Estados Unidos: Left Coast Press.
Sevilla, A. (2002). De Carnaval a Xantolo: contacto con el inframundo. México: Programa de Desarrollo Cultural de la Huasteca.
Sims, M. C. (2005). Living folklore: an introduction to the study of people and their traditions. Estados Unidos: Utah State University Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Estados Unidos: Routledge.
________, Akagawa, N. (2009) (Eds.). Intangible Heritage. Estados Unidos: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 PatryTer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.
- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.
- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.
- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
