The urban commons from a geographical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v7i14.46529Keywords:
Urban communities. neoliberalism. urban geography. socio-spatial activism.Abstract
The aim of this paper is to contribute to the discussion on the "urban commons" in Geography, seeking to provide elements that allow thinking about the "common" as a concept of Urban Geography. The methodology used was the survey and bibliographical analysis. In the first part, it was sought to briefly present the main approaches to the common. Then, in the following parts, the aim was to present the idea of the urban commons, making use of important theoretical contributions, but also building its own notion based on ideas and concepts already discussed at other times, reflecting its relevance as a concept of Urban Geography. In the end, it is concluded that raising the term 'common' to the level of a concept is extremely urgent, especially when considering the general tendency of contemporary socio-spatial activism, which has used practices of appropriating spaces and building communal and self-managed experiences.
Downloads
References
Bollier, D. (2002). Silent Theft: the private plunder of our common wealth. London: Routledge.
Bollier, D. (2007). The growth of the common’s paradigm. In: C. Hess. & E. Ostrom (Ed.) Understanding knowledge as a common: from theory to practice (pp. 27-40). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boyle, J. (2017). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. In B. Atkinson (Ed.). Copyright law (pp. 63-104). London: Routledge.
Correa, R. (1995) Espaço: um conceito-chave. In I. E. Castro; P. C. C. Gomes. (Org.). Geografia: conceitos e temas (pp. 15-47). Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
Dardot, P. & Laval. C (2017). Comum: ensaio sobre a revolução no século XXI. São Paulo: Boitempo.
De Angelis, M. (2007). The beginning of history: value struggles and global Capital. London: Pluto.
Federici, S. (2017). Calibã e a Bruxa: mulheres, corpo e acumulação primitiva. São Paulo: Elefante.
Federici, S. (2019). Re-enchanting the world: feminism and the politics of the commons. Michigan: PM Press.
Foster, S. & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34, 281-349
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the common. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of Empire. New York: Penguin Press.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: a framework for analysis. International journal of urban and regional research, 2(4), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1978.tb00738.x
Harvey, D. (2004). O novo imperialismo. São Paulo: Loyola.
Kip, M. (2015). Moving beyond the city: conceptualizing urban commons from a critical urban studies perspective. In: M. Dellenbaugh & M. Kip (Ed.) Urban commons: moving beyond state and market (pp. 42-59). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH.
Linebaugh, P. (2009). The Magna Carta Manifesto: liberties and commons for all. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Luxemburgo, R. (1976). A acumulação do capital: estudo sobre a interpretação econômica do imperialismo. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Santos, O. & Gomes, E. (2016). A questão do desenvolvimento e os desdobramentos recentes do processo de fragmentação do espaço urbano em Recife/PE - o caso do “Projeto Novo Recife''. Boletim Goiano de Geografia, 36, 379-389. https://doi.org/10.5216/bgg.v36i2.42801
Santos, O. & Castilho, C. (2021). O espaço urbano sob o neoliberalismo e os 'territórios da vida humana' como possibilidade do 'comum'. Revista Tamoios, 17, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.12957/tamoios.2021.58497
Santos, O. (2021). Segmentação, Segregação, Fragmentação. Revista da Casa de Geografia de Sobral, 23, 455-469. https://doi.org/10.35701/rcgs.v23.817
Souza, M. (2010). Com o Estado, apesar do Estado e contra o Estado: os movimentos urbanos e suas práticas espaciais, entre a luta institucional e a ação direta. Revista Cidades, 7(11), 13-47. https://doi.org/10.36661/2448-1092.2010v7n11.12223
Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city as commons. London: Zed Books.
Swyngedouw, E. (2012) A cidade pós-política. Revista e-metropolis, Rio de Janeiro, 08, 52-62
Tonucci, J. (2020). Do direito à cidade o comum urbano: contribuições para uma abordagem lefebvriana. Revista Direito e Praxis, 11(1), 370-404. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2020/48273
Vasconcelos, P. (2009). O rigor no uso das noções e conceitos na Geografia Urbana. Revista Cidades, 6(10), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.36661/2448-1092.2009v6n10.12283
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PatryTer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.
Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.
- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.
- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.
- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
