Elements of patrimonial value and memory. Focus from Itatiaia (Ouro Branco, MG, Brazil)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v6i12.42445Keywords:
heritage. memory. Itatiaia-MGAbstract
The research includes the heritage attributes of Itatiaia, Ouro Branco, Minas Gerais. Considering that each site has particularities that characterize it in time and space, it is assumed that it is essential to survey and understand the heritage assets in a contextualized way to promote their appreciation. Based on in loco investigations, documental and bibliographic analysis and interviews, the objective is to highlight the main references of this village established at the end of the 17th century. Another of the objectives is to provide supports to the local population in the necessary (and urgent) claims to the State for the purpose of assessment and safeguard. The perspective, in this initial stage, is to approach the cultural, historical and architectural dimensions of heritage value in an objective and subjective way. Preliminary results indicate that in the memory of local inhabitants, there is an expressive heritage value, involving both assets that have not withstood the passage of time, as well as those that remain.
Downloads
References
Alves, N. (2006). Irmãos de Cor e de Fé: irmandades negras na Parahyba do século XIX. (Dissertação de Mestrado em História). Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa.
Apaydin, V. (2020). The interlinkage of cultural memory, heritage and discourses of construction, transformation and destruction. In V. Apaydin (Ed.). Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage (pp. 13-30). London: UCL Press.
Bondi, M. & Sezzi, A. (2021). Disseminating the tangible and intangible heritage of sacred places in the 21st Century: The websites of british and italian cathedrals. Iperstoria, (18), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2021.i18.1040
Bujdosó, Z., Dávidb, L., Ęzsérc, A., Kovácsd, G., Gyöngyi K., Major-Kathie, V., Uakhitovaf, G., Katonag, P. & Vasvári, M. (2015). Basis of heritagization and cultural tourism development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.399
Chatzigrigoriou, P., Nikolakopoulou, V., Vakkas, T., Vosinakis, S. & Koutsabasis, P. (2021). Is architecture connected with intangible cultural heritage? Reflections from architectural digital documentation and interactive application design in three Aegean islands. Heritage, 2021, 4(2), 664-689. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4020038
Dimitropoulos, K.., Tsalakanidou, F., Nikolopoulos, S., Kompatsiaris, I., Grammalidis, N., Manitsaris, S., Denby, B., Crevier-Buchman, L. & Dupont, S. (2018). A Multimodal Approach for the Safeguarding and Transmission of Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Case of i-Treasures, in IEEE Intelligent Systems, 33(6), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2018.111144858
Djabarouti, J. (2020). Stories of feelings and things: intangible heritage from within the built heritage paradigm in the UK. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27(4), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1798271
Doina, D., Calin, F., Elena-Adriana, T. & Anisoara, P. (2011). The concept of cultural and traditional archetype. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1493-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.317
Duxbury, N. & Richards, G. (orgs.). (2019). A Research Agenda for Creative Tourism, Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fernandes, F. (1978). Fundamentos empíricos da explicação sociológica. Rio de Janeiro: Livros Técnicos e Científicos.
Freire, J. (2019). Patrimônio(s) Cultural(is): Abordagem fenomenológica para estudos de patrimonialização. PatryTer, 2(4). 83-99. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v2i4.22999
Freitas, I. & Koskowski, R. (2020). Heritage and sustainable development: capacity building through tourism. In S. Srivastava (Ed.), Capacity Building Through Heritage Tourism: An International Perspective, Apple Academic Press (pp. 113-131). http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3290
Freitas, I., Martín Cea, C., Villanueva, O. & Valdivieso, I. (2017). Abordagem metodológica de conservação da história e do patrimônio: O Vale do Douro. Tempo e Argumento, 9(21), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.5965/2175180309212017402
Freitas, I., Sousa, C., Ramazanova, M. & Albuquerque, H. (2021). Feeling a historic city: Porto landscape through the eyes of residents and visitors. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 8(2), 529-545. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJTC-05-2021-0086/full/html
Grey, C. & O’Tool, M. (2020). The Placing of Identity and the Identification of Place: “Place-Identity” in Community Lifeboating. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618768696
Guimarães, C., Maia, R., Oliveira, S. & Tricário, T. (2019). Interpretação do patrimônio cultural por meio da roteirização turística da Avenida 7 de Setembro, Manaus, AM. Interações: Revista Internacional de Desenvolvimento Local, 21(3), 479-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.20435/inter.v21i3.2364
Gutvilen, A., Silva, S., Pedrosa, J., Isenschmid, J. & Paiva, T. (2016). Matriz de Santo Antônio de Itatiaia – MG: história e estado de conservação. Vitruvius, 192(16), 1-12. https://vitruvius.com.br/revistas/read/arquitextos/16.192/6055
Harvey, D. (2018). A loucura da razão econômica: Marx e o capital no século XXI. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Hickenbick, C., Schemes, E., Carrelas, D. & Remoaldo, P. (2021). A salvaguarda do patrimônio cultural imaterial em Santa Catarina e as suas relações com o turismo cultural. Turismo: visão e ação , 23(2), 415-434. https://doi.org/10.14210/rtva.v23n2.p415-434
ICOMOS (2011). Princípios de La Valeta sobre a salvaguarda e gestão das cidades e dos conjuntos urbanos históricos. In Conselho Internacional dos Monumentos e Sítios. Malta. (pp. 01-10). https://www.icomos.pt/images/pdfs/2021/53%20Princ%C3%ADpios%20La%20Valetta%20conjuntos%20urbanos%20-%20ICOMOS%202011.pdf
Iphan (2021). Folia de Reis Devotos dos Magos. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/pagina/detalhes/989.
Kidder, D. (2001). Reminiscências de viagens e permanência no Brasil: Rio de Janeiro e Província de São Paulo. Brasília: Senado Federal.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Lógica formal, lógica dialética. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Lukács, G. (2012). História e consciência de classe: estudos sobre a dialética marxista.. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes.
Rocha, J. (1779). Mappa da Comarca de Villa Rica [Cartográfico], ca. 1740-1804. Acervo: Biblioteca Nacional, Coleção José Carlos Rodrigues. Rio de Janeiro. 1 mapa, color, 41 x 80 cm. http://objdigital.bn.br/acervo_digital/div_cartografia/cart1090219/cart1090219.jpg.
Martoni, R. (2019) Turismo & Capital. Curitiba: Appris.
Mason, R. (2002). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. In M. De la Torre (Ed). Assessing Values in Conservation Planning: methodological issues and choices. (pp. 05-30). Los Angeles: Report The Getty Conservation Institute.
Melis, C. & Chambers, D. (2021). The construction of intangible cultural heritage: A Foucauldian critique. Annals of Tourism Research, 89, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103206
Mendes, D. & Cavas, C. (2018). Benzedeiras e benzedeiros quilombolas: construindo identidades culturais. Interações, 19(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v19i1.1568
Mihăilă, M., Leonte, E., Boghiță, E. & Robu, A. (2020). The development and diversification of the rural economy by financing the tourism projects. Lucrări Ştiinţific Agronomie, 63(1), 195-198. http://www.uaiasi.ro/revagrois/PDF/2020-1/paper/35.pdf
Minarova-Banjac, C. (2018). Collective Memory and Forgetting: A Theoretical Discussion. Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies, 16. Queenslan, Austrália: Bond University. https://pure.bond.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/28738360/Collective_Memory_and_Forgetting.pdf
Peralta, B. (2018). Régimen de valor frente al valor intrínseco. Implicaciones y pertinencia de los conceptos indicados para explicar las contradicciones en los procesos de patrimonialización. PatryTer, 1(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v1i1.5810
Prestes, L. (1999). A Vila Tropeira de Nossa Senhora da Ponte de Sorocaba: aspectos socioeconômicos e arquitetura das classes dominantes (1750-1888). São Paulo: ProEditores.
Sebastien, L. (2020). The power of place in understanding place attachments and meanings. Geoforum, (108), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.001
Souza, M. (2019). Território usado, rugosidades e patrimônio cultural: ensaio geográfico sobre o espaço banal. PatryTer, 2(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v2i4.26485.
UNESCO (1989). Recomendação sobre a salvaguarda da cultura tradicional e popular. https://www.icomos.pt/images/pdfs/2021/30%20Recomenda%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20cultura%20popular%20-%20UNESCO%201989.pdf
UNESCO (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
Welburn, W. (2007). To keep the past in lively memory: William Carl Bolivar's efforts to preserve African American cultural heritage. Libraries and the Cultural Record, 42(2), 165-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25549403
Zanirato, S. (2020). Paisagem cultural e espírito do lugar como patrimônio: em busca de um pacto social de ordenamento territorial. Revista CPC, 15(29), 8-35. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4466.v15i29p8-35
Zinchuk, T., Kutsmus, N., Kovalchuck, O. & Charucka, O. (2018). Challenges of sustainable development of rural economy. Management Theory & Studies for Rural Business & Infrastructure Development, 40(4), 609-619. https://ejournals.vdu.lt/index.php/mtsrbid/article/view/204
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 PatryTer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.
Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.
- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.
- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.
- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
