Preserve and punish, legal and infralegal norms for the preservation of heritage in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v6i11.40863

Keywords:

contemporary theory of conservation. restoration. standardization. surveillance. perception

Abstract

The present research aims to investigate the truth enforcement operations, as proposed by Foucault, within the so-called “semantic surveillance” operations: conservation and restoration of cultural assets. In this way, we sought to analyze occurrences and recurrences of the terms "preserve" and "restore" in Brazilian legal and infralegal provisions, seeking to situate the practices of conservation of cultural heritage as provided for by the regulations and interpreted by the federal agency for cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eduardo Ferreira Moura, National Historical and Artistic Heritage Institute - IPHAN, Brazil

IPHAN, Brazil

References

Andrade, A. (1993). Um estado completo que pode jamais ter existido. (Tese de Doutorado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Andrade, R. (2012). Brasil: monumentos históricos e arqueológicos. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico Artístico Nacional.

Ashley-Smith, J. (1995). Definitions of Damage. https://cool.culturalheritage.org/byauth/ashley-smith/damage.html.

Bonsanti, G. (1997). Riparare l’arte. OPD Restauro, 9(1), 109-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24394789.

Brandi, C. (2013). Teoria da Restauração. São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.

Brasil. (1937). Decreto Lei n.º 25 de 30 de novembro de 1937. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del0025.htm.

Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.

Brasil. (2000). Decreto nº 3551, de 4 de agosto de 2000. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/d3551.htm.

Brasil. (2017). Decreto nº 9238, de 15 de dezembro de 2017. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/decreto/D9238.htm.

Choay, F. (2001). A Alegoria Do Patrimônio. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.

Chuva, M. (2009). Os Arquitetos Da Memória: sociogênese das práticas de preservação do patrimônio cultural no Brasil nos anos 1930 e 1940. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Foucault, M. (2004). Vigiar e Punir. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Gallois, C. (2019). Matéria, valor e autenticidade na conservação-restauração de bens tombados pelo IPHAN no Rio de Janeiro. (Tese de Doutorado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo). Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói.

Gonçalves, J. (2002). A Retórica da Perda. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Iphan. (2015). 01510.002723/2015-41 - Emprestimo de obra de arte “Vista parcial da Cidade Nossa Senhora do Desterro (atual Florianópolis)”, Tombo 028-576-SPHAN, para compor a exposição da 10ª Bienal do Mercosul. https://sei.iphan.gov.br/sei/modulos/pesquisa/md_pesq_documento_consulta_externa.php?9LibXMqGnN7gSpLFOOgUQFziRouBJ5VnVL5b7-UrE5TUNYQ_buG6sDr6slyfQ4983KvOYcnwomdamCRGp1VkDc_V5QBbvjF08CcNAOUg9TDw7pm0tlTt-hxHk2H4HwUD.

Iphan. (2018). Política do Patrimônio Cultural Material. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/publicacao_politica_do_patrimonio.pdf.

Iphan. (2019). Intervenções em Bens Culturais Móveis e Integrados à Arquitetura: manual para elaboração de projetos. Brasília: Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico Artístico Nacional.

Iphan. (2020). Relatório de Gestão do IPHAN: Exercício 2020. Brasília: Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico Artístico Nacional.

Iphan. (2021). Lista dos Bens Tombados e Processos em Andamento. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/pagina/detalhes/126.

Kelsen, H. (1998). Teoria Pura do Direito. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Martínez Justícia, M. (2000). Historia y teoría de la conservación y restauración artística. Madrid: Tecnos.

Meneses, U. (2012). O campo do Patrimônio Cultural: uma revisão de premissas. In I Fórum Nacional do Patrimônio Cultural (pp. 25-39). http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/4%20-%20MENESES.pdf.

Motta, L. (2015). Um panorama do campo da preservação do patrimônio cultural. Rio de Janeiro: COPEDOC/DAF/IPHAN.

Muñoz Viñas, S. (2003). Teoría Contemporánea de la Restauración. Madrid: Sintesis.

Muñoz Viñas, S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Burlington: Elsevier.

Muñoz Viñas, S. (2017). The Transactional Nature of Heritage Conservation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University of Ars.

Sant’anna, M. (2015). Preservação como prática: sujeitos, objetos, concepções e instrumentos. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/Preservação%20pdf(1).pdf.

Sant’anna, M. (2017). A cidade-atração: a norma de preservação de áreas centrais no Brasil dos anos 1990. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia.

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Abingdon: Routledge.

Telles, M., & Costa, R. (2014). O (In)verso da Proteção do Patrimônio Cultural: análise do instituto jurídico do cancelamento de tombamento. http://www.publicadireito.com.br/artigos/?cod=42dac78c17149caa.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-26

How to Cite

Moura, E. F. (2023). Preserve and punish, legal and infralegal norms for the preservation of heritage in Brazil. PatryTer, 6(11), 01–18. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v6i11.40863

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 11 (2023)

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2023 PatryTer

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:

- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.

- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.

- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.

- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.

- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.

- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).