Architecture between plan, trick and feint

spatial hacking strategies based on Cildo Meireles’ work “Insertions in ideological circuits”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n33.2022.09

Keywords:

Architectural project, Hacker, Political strategy

Abstract

In this article, we argue that a rational compromise by the 'plan' is just one mode of architectural action, that is, there are at least two other modes that can be considered when designing: either the covert 'trick' that decouples statement from operation; as for the 'feint' that openly declares its opposition, but that sways marginally as a way of deflecting it and winning it. Furthermore, we argue that although we are mostly trained to design by plans, contemporary urban contexts and challenges have required us to know how to act by tricks and feints – especially in the political conditions of the Global South. This article intends, therefore, to assist in the theoretical construction of these two other ways of designing. To do so, it reviews Keller Easterling's theoretical proposal on 'spatial hacking' and proposes that Cildo Meireles' work “Insertions in ideological circuits” can be considered an important political/aesthetic reference for architectural trickery and feint, as it offers lessons for a theoretical construction on the difference between the two.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cauê Capillé, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Professor at the Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (FAU UFRJ) and at the Graduate Programme in Urbanism (PROURB FAU UFRJ). Architect (FAU UFRJ, 2011); PhD in Architecture (the Bartlett UCL, 2016); FAPERJ Post-Doctoral Researcher at PROURB FAU UFRJ (2017-18); Urban Studies Foundation Fellow at ENSA Paris Malaquais (2021-22); Visiting Researcher at Royal College of Art (2021-22). His research and design studios focus on the relationship between architectural design, political and urban theories and ordinary urban conditions. His works have been awarded and exhibited on different occasions, including the Ibero-American Biennial, the São Paulo International Architecture Biennial; the European Cultural Centre in Venice (parallel to the Architecture Bienale); and the RIBA President’s Awards for Research. Co-author of “Rio Metropolitano: guide for an architecture” (2013) and “Post-Compact City: Design Strategies from Brasília” (2021).

Mariana Cruz, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Urbanismo

Mariana Cruz is an undergraduate student in Architecture and Urbanism at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (FAU UFRJ). Since 2019, he has participated in the research "Architecture of the transit state" in the Urbanism, Criticism and Architecture (UrCA) research group at PROURB FAU UFRJ, where he has been a PIBIC-UFRJ fellow since 2020. since 2020, at Atelier de Arquitetura e Desenho Urbano.

References

ANJOS, M. DOS. Babel. In: MATOS, D.; WISNIK, G. (Eds.). . Cildo: estudos, espaços, tempo. São Paulo: Ubu, 2017. p. 185–191.

BENJAMIN, W. A obra de arte na era de sua reprodutibilidade técnica. In: Magia e Técnica, Arte e Política: Ensaios sobre literatura e história da cultura - Obras escolhidas volume 1. Traducao Sergio Paulo Rouanet. 3. ed. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1987. p. 165–198.

BOURDIEU, P. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique - Précédée de trois études d’ethnologie kabyle. Genève: Librairie Droz, 1972.

BRETT, G. Cinco abordagens. In: MATOS, D.; WISNIK, G. (Eds.). . Cildo: estudos, espaços, tempo. São Paulo: Ubu, 2017. p. 176–180.

BRITO, R. Frequência imodulada. In: MATOS, D.; WISNIK, G. (Eds.). . Cildo: estudos, espaços, tempo. São Paulo: Ubu, 2017. p. 162–164.

BUCK-MORSS, S. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1991.

BÜRGER, P. Theory of the avant-garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

DUCHAMP, M. Ready-made. In: BRETON, A.; ÉLUARD, P. (Eds.). . Dictionnaire abrégé du surréalisme. Paris: Galerie des Beaux-Arts, 1938.

DUCHAMP, M.; STIEGLITZ, A. Fountain. The blind man, v. 2, p. 4–6, 1917.

EASTERLING, K. We will be making active form. Architectural Design, v. 82, n. 5, p. 58–63, 2012.

EASTERLING, K. Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. London: Verso, 2014.

EASTERLING, K. Split screen. In: RUBY, I.; RUBY, A. (Eds.). . Infrastructure space. Berlin: Holcim Foundation (Ruby Press), 2017. p. 264–272.

EASTERLING, K. Replicating. In: ALTBERG, A.; MENEGUETTI, M.; KOZLOWSKI, G. (Eds.). . 8 Reações para o depois / 8 reactions for afterwards. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books, 2019. p. 230–263.

EASTERLING, K. Medium Design: Knowing How to Work on the WorldLondon, New YorkVerso, , 2021.

FOUCAULT, M. Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1975.

GIBSON, J. J. The ecological approach to visual perception. New York and London: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

JACOBY, S. What’s your type? In: LEE, C. C. M.; JACOBY, S. (Eds.). . Typological Formations: renewable types and the city. London: AA Publications, 2007. p. 148–157.

JACOBY, S. Typal and typological reasoning: A diagrammatic practice of architecture. Journal of Architecture, v. 20, n. 6, p. 938–961, 2015.

KAIJIMA, M.; KURODA, J.; TSUKAMOTO, Y. Made in Tokyo. Tokyo: Kajima Institute Publishing, 2006.

KOOLHAAS, R. Delirious New York: A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. New York: The Monacelli Press, 1994.

LASSANCE, G. et al. Cidade pós–compacta: estratégias de projeto a partir de Brasília. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books, 2021.

LASSANCE, G.; VARELLA, P.; CAPILLÉ, C. Rio Metropolitano: guia para uma arquitetura / Metropolitan Rio: guide for an architecture. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books, 2012.

MEIRELES, C. Inserções em circuitos ideológicos. In: FERREIRA, G.; COTRIM, C. (Eds.). . Escritos de Artistas, Anos 60/70. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2006. p. 264–265.

MORAIS, F. A arte como trabalho sedutor da contrainformação industrial, cultural e ideológica. In: MATOS, D.; WISNIK, G. (Eds.). . Cildo: estudos, espaços, tempo. São Paulo: Ubu, 2017. p. 168–177.

MORAIS, F.; MEIRELES, C. Linguagem material. In: SCOVINO, F. (Ed.). . Cildo Meireles. Rio de Janeiro: Beco do Azougue, 2009. p. 214–233.

NORTON, L. Buddha of the Bathroom. The blind man, n. 2, p. 5–6, 1917.

OBRIST, H. U.; MEIRELES, C. Cildo Meireles. In: Entrevistas Brasileiras vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Cobogó, 2018. p. 409–436.

OYARZUN, L. J. Common Spatialities: The Production of the Multitude. Footprint, p. 51–68, 2015.

ROLNIK, S. Desvio para o inominável. In: MATOS, D.; WISNIK, G. (Eds.). . Cildo: estudos, espaços, tempo. São Paulo: Ubu, 2017. p. 197–201.

SEITZ, W. The art of assemblage. New York: The Museum of Modern Art: Distributed by Doubleday, 1961.

TAFURI, M. Operative Criticism. In: Teories and History of Architecture. New York: Harper & Row, 1980. p. 141–170.

TSUKAMOTO, Y. Pet Architecture Guide Book. Tokyo: World Photo Press, 2002.

VENTURI, R.; SCOTT BROWN, D.; IZENOUR, S. Learning from Las Vegas. Revised ed ed. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1977.

WAISMAN, M. O Interior da história: Historiografia arquitetônica para uso de latino-americanos. Traducao Anita Di Marco. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2013.

WALKER, E. et al. The Ordinary: Recordings. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

WISNIK, G. T. Dentro do labirinto: Hélio Oiticica e o desafio do “público” no Brasil. ARS (São Paulo), v. 15, n. 30, p. 95–110, 2017.

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Capillé, C., & Cruz, M. (2022). Architecture between plan, trick and feint: spatial hacking strategies based on Cildo Meireles’ work “Insertions in ideological circuits”. Paranoá, 15(33), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n33.2022.09

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.