Integrating geographic intelligence for sustainable powerline planning
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n3.2023.50476Mots-clés :
AHP, Powerline planning, GIS, Conceptual model, Participatory model, Decision-makingRésumé
This research explores the potential of geographic intelligence in modelling optimal corridors for assessing alternative locations for power transmission lines at different stages of the study. The difficulties verified in the environmental licensing of new projects, the expansion of the national transmission system, and the lack of work to research techniques for formulating locational alternatives are motivating questions for this research. The investigation employs a multicriteria decision-making approach integrated with a geographic information framework to compute and map the feasibility corridors based on environmental constraints and stakeholder inputs. Findings reveal that the current decision-making process for implementing new power transmission lines involves disparate public and private entities operating non-integratively in a multi-level analysis and decision-making process. Through a case study utilising multicriteria analysis and expert consultations, the research demonstrates the applicability of spatial modelling in the locational planning of transmission projects. It highlights the model's capacity to address the complexity inherent in such studies, aggregate analyses and decisions from various stakeholders, and enhance transparency in the decision-making process from energy planning to operational phases.
Téléchargements
Références
AMBIENTARE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, ATE XXII. Simplified Environmental Report: 500 kV Marimbondo II LT – Campinas and Associated Substations, 2014.
ARAÚJO, F. R. N. Coordenação de dados, valores e participação de atores na tomada de decisão em estudos de alternativas locacionais de linhas de transmissão: uma proposta utilizando modelagem espacial e análise multi- criterial. (Dissertação de Mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. 2016 p. 2016. Available at: https:// repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/IGCM-A9ZHNC.
ARAÚJO, F. R. N.; AJUZ, R. C. de A.; RAMOS, A, B. Metodologia de análise espacial de sistemas de transmissão de energia no licenciamento ambiental federal. In: VILELA, M. A. Geoprocessamento no setor elétrico – aplicações práticas. Editora Del Rey, 2021.
BAGLI, S.; GENELITTI, D.; ORSI, F. Routing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evalua- tion to minimise environmental impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 234-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.003
BIASOTTO, L. D. et al. Routing power lines: towards an environmental and engineering friendly framework for avoiding impacts and conflicts in the planning phase. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 95, p. 106797-106808, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106797
BRAZILIAN INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENT AND RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES. Technical Report n. 02015.000113/2014-15 NLA/MG/IBAMA, Belo Horizonte, 2014.
BRAZILIAN NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Resolution no 237 of December 29, 1997. 1997 Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res97/res23797.html.
CARDOSO JÚNIOR, R. A. F.; MAGRINI, A.; DA HORA, A. F. Environmental licensing process of power transmission in Brazil update analysis: case study of the Madeira transmission system. Energy Policy, v. 67, p. 281–289. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.040
CARDOSO JÚNIOR, R. A. F.; HOFFMANN, A. S. Environmental licensing for transmission systems and electricity sec- tor planning in Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 132, p. 1155-1162. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.018
CHAKHAR, S.; MOUSSEAU, V. Spatial Multicriteria Decision Making. Control, v. 20, n. 11, p. 1392. 2008.
CHURCH, R. L.; LOBAN, S. R.; LOMBARD, K. An interface for exploring spatial alternatives for a corridor loca- tion problem. Computers and Geosciences, v. 18, n. 8, p. 1095 –1105. 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0098-3004(92)90023-K
COSTA, W. L. S. Modelagem geográfica como recurso para transversalidade do planejamento de transportes. (Tese de Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 241 p. 2023. Available at: https://repositorio.ufmg. br/handle/1843/53344
DOUGLAS, D. H. Least-cost path in GIS using an accumulated cost surface and slopelines. Cartographica, v. 18, n. 3, p. 37-51. 1994. Available at: https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/D327-0323-2JUT-016M DOI: 10.3138/D327-0323-2JUT-016M
EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Diretrizes para elaboração dos relatórios técnicos referentes às novas ins- talações da rede básica, Brasília. 2005. Available at: http://www.epe.gov.br/Transmissao/Paginas/Diretrizespara. aspx?CategoriaID=
EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Estudos para licitação da expansão da transmissão. Detalhamento da alternativa recomendada: relatório R1 – Expansão da interligação entre as regiões Norte-Sudeste e Norte-Nor- deste, Brasília. 2012.
FORMAN, E.; PENIWATI, K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, v. 1, n.1, p. 165-169. 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377- 2217(97)00244-0
GREENING, L. A.; BERNOW, S. Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multicriteria de- cision-making. Energy Policy, v. 32, n. 6, p. 721–735. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.017
JANKOWSKI, P. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, v. 9, n. 3, p. 251–273. 1995. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/02693799508902036
KUMAR, A. et al. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy de- velopment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 69, p. 596-609, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2016.11.191
LEON, M. B.; COSTA, W. L. S.; NÓBREGA, R. A. A. Una perspectiva ambiental en el planeamiento de la Ferrovía Bioceánica: modelamiento cuantitativo de escenarios. Revista Ibero-americana de Ciências Ambientais, v. 11, p. 444-468, 2020. DOI: 10.6008/CBPC2179-6858.2020.003.0035
LEUSEN, M. V. Viewshed and Cost Surface Analysis Using GIS. Cartographic Modelling in a Cell-Based GIS. Pro- ceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998 (BAR International Series 757). Archaeopress, Oxford, p. 215-224.
LIMA, L. H.; MAGRINI, A. The Brazilian Audit Tribunal's role in improving the federal environmental licensing pro- cess. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 30, n. 2, p. 108–115. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eiar.2009.08.005
MALCZEWSKI, J. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. 1999.
MANSO, L. A. F. et al. Planejamento de Redes Elétricas considerando a Integração de Fontes Renováveis. Sim-
pósio de Especialistas em Planejamento da Operação Elétrica, 12. 2012.
MINISTRY OF MINES AND ENERGY. Energy Research Office (EPE). Decennial energy expansion plan 2031, Brasí- lia. 2022. Available at: https://www.epe.gov.br/pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/plano-decenal-de-ex- pansao-de-energia-2031.
NATIONAL ELECTRIC ENERGY AGENCY (Brazil). Jun 2019 In: Differentiated Monitoring of the Expansion of Trans- mission. National Electric Energy Agency. Aneel, Brasília. 2019.
NÓBREGA, R. A. A. et al. Inteligência geográfica para avaliação de propostas de projeto de concessão de corredo- res ferroviários. Transportes, v. 24, p. 75-84, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v24i4.1077
NÓBREGA, R. A. A. et al. Bridging decision-making process and environmental needs in corridor planning. Manage- ment of Environmental Quality, v. 20, n. 6, p. 622–637. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830910990744
POHEKAR, S. D.; RAMACHANDRAN, M. Application of multicriteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 8, n. 4, p. 365–381. 2004. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
RUDNICK, H. et al. Transmission expansion in fast-growing economies and the challenges of renewables integra- tion. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, p. 1–8. 2012.
SAATY, T. L.; VARGAS, L. G. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer Science & Business Media. 2001.
SADASIVUNI, R. et al. A Transportation corridor case study for multicriteria background – analytical hierarchy process. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2009. Available at: http://www.asprs.org/a/ publications/proceedings/baltimore09/0082.pdf.
SALIM, D. H. C. et al. Unveiling Fernando de Noronha Island's photovoltaic potential with unmanned aerial survey and irradiation modeling. Applied Energy, v. 337, p. 120857-11, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apener- gy.2023.120857
SANCHÉZ, L. Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental: conceitos e métodos. Editora Oficina de Textos, São Paulo. 2006.
SILVA, A. L. T. Transmission Lines and Substations Auctions for the Expansion of the National Interconnected System in Brazil. School of Business and Public Management Institute of Brazilian Business and Public Manage- ment Issues – IBI nt. 29p. 2009. Available at: https://www2.gwu.edu/~ibi/minerva/Spring2009/Andre.pdf.
SILVA, R. C.; MARCHI NETO, I.; SEIFERT, S. S. Electricity supply security and the future role of renewable ener- gy sources in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 59, p. 328-341, 2016. DOI: https://doi.or- g/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.001
STICH, B. et al. Using multicriteria decision making to highlight stakeholders’ values in the corridor planning process. Journal of Transport and Land Use, v. 4, p. 105-118, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v4i3.171
WANG, J. J. et al. Review on multicriteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 13, n. 9, p. 2263–2278. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Sustainability in Debate 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.