The hidden vulnerabilities behind financial sustainability: a case study of a sugarcane farm business in Pemalang City, Central Java, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n3.2023.50914Keywords:
Vulnerability, Climate Change , Financial , Feasible Study, Sugarcane, Farm BusinessAbstract
This study assesses the financial viability of a 4-hectare sugarcane farming enterprise operated by Perhutani, an Indonesian State-Owned Enterprise. The farm is situated in the geographical limits of Pemalang City, which is located in the Central Java Province of Indonesia. This study employs a financial feasibility analysis approach that involves the computation of key financial indicators such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Pay Back Period (PBP), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR), and the application of sensitivity analysis. Overall, the assessment of the viability of a 4-hectare sugarcane farming enterprise indicates that it is financially feasible and has the potential to operate as a sustainable business. This conclusion is drawn from the positive numerical values obtained through various financial analysis techniques. Nevertheless, it is evident from the conducted sensitivity analysis that sugarcane farming is a highly susceptible business to fluctuations in prevailing conditions. When molasses production experienced reductions of 10% and 15%, most financial feasibility analysis estimates yielded negative values. The issue of production vulnerability extending beyond economic feasibility has been rendered inconspicuous by many reasons, including climate change.
Downloads
References
ADGER, W. N. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, v. 16, n. 3, p. 268–281, 2006. Available at: https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378006000422.
AKINYI, D. P.; NG'ANG'A, S. K.; GIRVETZ, E. H. Trade-offs and synergies of climate change adaptation strategies among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Regional Sustainability, v. 2, n. 2, p. 130– 143, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.05.002.
ANTWI-AGYEI, P.; STRINGER, L. C. Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: insights from northeastern Ghana. Climate Risk Management, v. 32, n. May 2020, p. 100304, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304.
ARAGÓN, F. M.; RESTUCCIA, D.; RUD, J. P. Are small farms really more productive than large farms? Food Policy, v. 106, 1 Jan 2022.
ARAYA, B.; ASAFU-ADJAYE, J. Returns to Farm-Level Soil Conservation on Tropical Steep Slopes: the case of the Eritrean Highlands. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 50, n. 3, p. 589–605, 1 Set 1999. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00900.x.
BAEZ-GONZALEZ, A. D. et al. Potential impact of future climate change on sugarcane under dryland conditions in Mexico. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, v. 204, n. 5, p. 515–528, 1 Out 2018. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1111/jac.12278.
BERNAL, N. et al. Impact of heat waves on cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality in municipali- ties of Northeast Brazil. Sustainability in Debate, v. 13, n. 2, SE-Articles-Varia, p. 96–122, 30 Ago 2022. Available at: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/42228.
CHRISTINA, M. et al. Impact of climate variability and extreme rainfall events on sugarcane yield gap in a tropical Island. Field Crops Research, v. 274, p. 108326, 2021. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti- cle/pii/S0378429021002720.
CONCEIÇÃO, M. C. G. et al. International climate change negotiation: the role of Brazil. Sustainability in Debate, v. 10, n. 3, SE-Articles-Varia, p. 379–395, 31 Dez 2019. Available at: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/ article/view/27962.
DIATIN, I. et al. Production performance and financial feasibility analysis of farming catfish (Clarias gariepinus) utilising water exchange system, aquaponic, and biofloc technology. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, v. 20, n. 5, p. 344–351, 1 Jul 2021.
DUNGUMARO, E. W.; HYDEN, G. Challenges and Opportunities to Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Development Among Tanzanian Rural Communities. Sustainability in Debate, v. 1, n. 2, SE-Dossier, p. 77, 22 Dez 2010. Available at: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/15274.
ETONGO, D. et al. Risk perceptions, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change at farm level across four agricultural zones in Seychelles. World Development Sustainability, v. 1, n. July, p. 100025, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100025.
FLACK-PRAIN, S. et al. The impact of climate change and climate extremes on sugarcane production. GCB Bioen- ergy, v. 13, n. 3, p. 408–424, 1 Mar 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12797.
GAMBELLI, D.; SOLFANELLI, F.; ZANOLI, R. Feasibility of risk-based inspections in organic farming: results from a probabilistic model. Agricultural Economics, v. 45, n. 3, p. 267–277, 1 Mai 2014. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1111/agec.12063.
GAUTAM, M.; AHMED, M. Too small to be beautiful? The farm size and productivity relationship in Bangla- desh. Food Policy, v. 84, p. 165–175, 2019. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0306919218302434.
INDONESIA CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS. Indonesia Agriculture Survey. Jakarta: [s.n.], 2021.
INDONESIAN CENTRAL BANK. BI 7-Day Reverse Repo Rate in 5,75. Jakarta: [s.n.], 21 Set 2023.
KHAN, M. A. et al. Sensitivity Analysis for the Determinants of Investment Appraisal. Audit. Financiar., 1 Jan 2017.
KHANNA, M.; ISIK, M.; WINTER-NELSON, A. Investment in site-specific crop management under uncertainty: im- plications for nitrogen pollution control and environmental policy. Agricultural Economics, v. 24, n. 1, p. 9–12, 1 Dez 2000. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00089.x.
KUMAR, G. et al. Economics of U.S. catfish farming practices: profitability, economies of size, and liquidity. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, v. 51, n. 4, p. 829–846, 1 Ago 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12717.
LEBEL, P. et al. Perceptions of climate-related risks and awareness of climate change of fish cage farmers in northern Thailand. Risk Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 1–22, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2015.4.
LINNENLUECKE, M. K.; NUCIFORA, N.; THOMPSON, N. Implications of climate change for the sugarcane industry. WIREs Climate Change, v. 9, n. 1, p. e498, 1 Jan 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.498.
LIVERPOOL-TASIE, L. S. O. Is fertiliser use inconsistent with expected profit maximisation in sub-Saharan Africa? "Evidence from Nigeria". Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 68, n. 1, p. 22–44, 1 Fev 2017. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12162.
MACHADO, P. G. et al. Assessment of the Expansion of Sugar Cane: application of the sustainability barometer in the municipalities of Barretos and Jaboticabal, São Paulo State, Brazil. Sustainability in Debate, v. 5, n. 1, SE-, p. 16–28, 30 Abr 2014. Available at: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/15586.
MENDES, P. D. A. G. et al. Public policies and adaptation to climate change: three case studies in the Brazilian Semi-Arid region. Sustainability in Debate, v. 13, n. 3, SE-Articles-Varia, p. 209–245, 29 Dez 2022. Available at: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/46064.
MOSHKIN, E. et al. Assessment of willingness-to-pay for bio-based fertilisers among farmers and agricultural advisors in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 414, p. 137548, 15 Ago 2023. Accessed on: 16 jun. 2023.
PETER, J. Risk Analysis in Corporate Financial Modelling. Economy and Finance, v. 7, n. 1, Mar 2020.
ROY, P. et al. Climate change and groundwater overdraft impacts on agricultural drought in India: vulnerability assessment, food security measures and policy recommendation. Science of The Total Environment, v. 849, p. 157850, 2022. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972204949X.
SANTOS, D. J. dos et al. Future rainfall and temperature changes in Brazil under global warming levels of 1.5oC, 2oC and 4oC. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, SE-Dossier, p. 57–90, 31 Dez 2020. Available at: https://period- icos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/33933.
SAUNDERS. Simple Sensitivity Analysis by Financial Modelling. International Journal of the IMA, v. 2, n. 1, Jan 1983.
VASQUEZ-ARROYO, E. et al. Climate impacts in the Brazilian energy security: analysis of observed events and adaptation options. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, SE-Dossier, p. 157–196, 4 Jan 2021. Available at: https:// periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sust/article/view/33838.
ZHAO, D.; LI, Y.-R. Climate Change and Sugarcane Production: potential impact and mitigation strategies. Interna- tional Journal of Agronomy, v. 2015, p. 547386, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/547386.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
