Limitações da abordagem coaseana à definição do instrumento de Pagamento por Serviços Ambientais (PSA)

Authors

  • Daniel Caixeta Andrade Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Marcelo Simões Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v4n1.2013.9200

Keywords:

Payments for environmental services, Public goods, Transaction costs, Institutionalism, Ecological Economics

Abstract

Despite the popularity of PES instruments, there are questions about the adequacy
of its theoretical and conceptual background. This paper presents a theoretical and
a review research with the purpose of contributing to the discussion on the
development of new conceptual approaches that are able to reconcile PES theory
and experiences. The discussion points to the contributions of Ecological and
Institutional Economics in order to expand the concept of PES, considering that
those allow for the input of different environmental, social and economic contexts,
and seek to deal with efficiency and equity effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Caixeta Andrade, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Professor, Doutor em Desenvolvimento Econômico e Professor do Instituto de Economia da Universidade
Federal de Uberlândia.

Marcelo Simões, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Economista e mestrando em Economia pela Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.

References

ANDRADE, D.C., FASIABEN, M.C.R.. A utilização dos instrumentos de política
ambiental para a preservação do meio ambiente: o caso dos Pagamentos por Serviços
Ecossistêmicos (PSE). Economia Ensaios, 24 (1), p. 113-133, 2009.
ANDRADE, D.C., ROMEIRO, A.R. Degradação Ambiental e Teoria Econômica: Algumas
Reflexões sobre uma ‘Economia dos Ecossistemas’. EconomiA, Brasília, ANPEC,
v.12 (1), jan/abr. 2011, p. 3-26, 2011.
ANDRADE, D.C., ROMEIRO, A.R, SIMÕES, M.S. From an Empty to a Full World: a
nova natureza da escassez e suas implicações. Economia e Sociedade (UNICAMP. Impresso), v. 21, p. 695-722, 2012.
CECHIN, A.; VEIGA, J.E. da. O fundamento central da economia ecológica. In: MAY,
P.H. (org.) Economia do Meio Ambiente: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier,
2010.
COASE, R.H., 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1”“
44, 1960.
CORBERA, E., SOBERANIS, C.G., BROWN, K. Institutional dimensions of Payments
for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme.
Ecological Economics 68, p. 743-761, 2009.
CORBERA, E., BROWN, K., ADGER, W.N. The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for
Ecosystem Services. Development and change 38 (4), p. 587-613, 2007.
DALY, H.E. Towards an environmental economics. Land Economics 67 (2), p. 255-
259, May, 1991.
__________. Economics in a full world. Scientific American, September, p. 100-
107, 2005.
ENGEL, S., PAGIOLA S., WUNDER, S. Designing payments for environmental services
in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, p. 668
674, 2008.
FARLEY, J., COSTANZA, R. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global.
Ecological Economics 69, p. 2060-2068, 2010.
FERRARO, P.J. Asymmetric Information and Contract Design for Payments for
Environmental Services. Ecological Economics 65, p. 810-821, 2008.
GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1971.
GRIEG-GRAN, M., PORRAS, I.T., WUNDER, S. How can market mechanisms for forest
environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America.
Ecological Economics 63, p. 649-655, 2005.
KEMKES, R., FARLEY, J., KOLIBA, C. J. Determining when payments are an effective
policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69 (6), p.
2.069-2.074, 2010.
KOSOY, N., CORBERA, E. AND BROWN, K. ‘Participation in payments for ecosystem
services: Case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico’. Geoforum, v. 39 (6),
p. 2073-2083, 2008.
KRONENBERG, J., HUBACEK, K. Cold payments for ecosystem services create an
“ecosystem service curse”? Ecology and Society 18(1): 10, 2013.
MANGABEIRA, J.A., TÔSTO, S.G., BOLFE, E.L. Valoração de serviços ecossistêmicos
em sistemas agroflorestais (SAF’s). In: Pagamentos por Serviços Ecossistêmicos:
novos desafios para a pesquisa interdisciplinar no Brasil. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira
de Economia Ecológica, nº 27-28, p. 21-26, 2011.
MAY, P. Mecanismos de mercado para conservação da biodiversidade. In: Pagamentos
por Serviços Ecossistêmicos: novos desafios para a pesquisa interdisciplinar
no Brasil. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Ecológica, nº 27-28, p.14-
20, 2011.
MERINO PÉREZ, L., 2005. El desarrollo institucional de esquemas de pago por
servicios ambientales. Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Disponível em: http://
www.ine.gob.mx/ueajei/publicaciones/gacetas/460/merino.html. Acesso em: abril
de 2011.
MÜELLER, C.C. Economia, entropia e sustentabilidade: abordagens e visões de futuro
da Economia da Sobrevivência. Estudos Econômicos, v. 29 (4), p. 513-550, outdez,
1999.
MURADIAN, R., ARSEL, M., PELLEGRINI, L., ADAMAN, F., AGUILAR, B., AGARWAL,
B., CORBERA, E., DE BLAS, D. E., FARLEY, J., FROGER, G., GARCIA-FRAPOLLI, E.,
GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E., GOWDY, J., KOSOY, N., LE COQ, J.F., LEROY, P., MAY, P.,
MÉRAL, P., MIBIELLI, P., NORGAARD, R., OZKAYNAK, B., PASCUAL, U., PENGUE, W.,
PEREZ, M., PESCHE, D., PIRARD, R., RAMOS-MARTIN, J., RIVAL, L., SAENZ, F., VAN
HECKEN, G., VATN, A., VIRA, B., URAMA, K. Payments for ecosystem services and
the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 2013. doi: 10.1111/
j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
MURADIAN, R., CORBERA, E., PASCUAL U., KOSOY N., MAY P.H. Reconciling theory
and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for
environmental services. Ecological Economics 69 (6), p. 1202-1208, 2010.
NORTH, D. Understanding the Process of Institutional Change. Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 2005.
OSTROM, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
__________. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 2005.
__________. Why do we need to protect institutional diversity? European Policy
Science, p. 128”“147, 2012.
OZKAYNAK, B; DEVINE, P.; RIGBY, D. Operationalising strong sustainability:
definitions, methodologies and outcomes. Environmental Values 13, p. 279-303,
2004.
PAAVOLA, J. Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization.
Ecological Economics 63, p. 93-103, 2007.
PAAVOLA, J., ADGER, W.N. Institutional ecological economics. Ecological Economics
53, p. 353-368, 2005.
PAGIOLA, S., ARCENAS, A., PLATAIS. Can payments for environmental services help
reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date. World
Development 33, p. 237-253, 2005.
PAGIOLA, S., PLATAIS, G. Payment for Environmental Services: from theory to practice.
Washington D.C.: Environmental Department, World Bank, 2007.
PASCUAL, U., MURADIAN, R., RODRÍGUEZ, L.C., DURAIAPPAH, A. Exploring the links
between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual
approach. Ecological Economics 69, p. 1237-1244, 2010.
PATTANAYAK, S., WUNDER, S., FERRARO, P. Show me the money: do payments supply
environmental services in developing countries? Review of. Environmental.
Economics and Policy. v. 4, p. 254”“274, 2010.
ROCKSTRÖM, J. et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for
humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): 32, 2009.
SOMMERVILLE, M., JONES, J.P.G, MILNER-GULLAND, E.J. A Revised Conceptual
Framework for Payments for Environmental Services. Ecology and Society 14(2): 34,
2009.
SHIKI, S., SHIKI, S.F.N. Os Desafios de uma Política Nacional de Pagametnos por
Serviços Ambientais: lições a partir do caso do Proambiente. Sustentabilidade em
Debate ”“ Brasília, v. 2, n. 1, p. 99-118, 2011.
SHIKI, S., SHIKI, S.F.N, ROSADO, P.L., FERNANDES, E.A. Payment for Ecosystem
Services Markets and Rural Development in Brazil ”“ a co-evolutionary approach.
ISEE 2012 Conference ”“ Ecological Economics and Rio+20: Challenges and
Contributions for a Green Economy. Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
SPERANZA, C.I.I., SAND, I.V.D. Can the rural economy deliver ecosystem services?
CAB Reviews, v. 5(31), p.1-16, 2010.
VATN, A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological
Economics 69 (6), p. 1245-1252, 2010.
WUNDER, S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Center for
International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Occasional Paper n. 42, 2005.
___________. Necessary conditions for ecosystem service payments. Conference
Paper. Economics and Conservation in the Tropics: A Strategic Dialogue, January 31- February 1, 2008.
ZILBERMAN, D., LIPPER, L., MCCARTHY, N. Putting payments for environment
services in the context of economic development. ESA Working Paper n. 06-15, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2013-07-01

How to Cite

Andrade, D. C., & Simões, M. (2013). Limitações da abordagem coaseana à definição do instrumento de Pagamento por Serviços Ambientais (PSA). Sustainability in Debate, 4(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v4n1.2013.9200

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2013)

Section

Dossier

License

SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement

The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)