Towards a low carbon economy in the Amazon:

the role of land-use policies

Authors

  • René Verburg Agricultural Economics Research Institute - LEI-Wageningen UR
  • Diego Lindoso Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB
  • Nathan Debortoli Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB
  • Saulo Rodrigues Filho Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v2n2.2011.5820

Keywords:

Greenhouse gas, Emissions, Agriculture, Deforestation, Brazil, Cattle, Soy, Conservation policies

Abstract

Climate change, rising oil prices and the global financial crisis has put sustainability and
‘green growth’ of the economy on the political agenda. While the transition towards a “low carbon”
economy in developed countries like in the European Union should mainly be found in renewable
energy production, developing countries like Brazil face with high land use emissions which will
further rise in the coming decades without proper policy instruments. Deforestation and cattle
production are the main sources of land use emissions in Brazil and we expect that these emissions
will further rise with liberalisation of agricultural trade. A transition towards a “low carbon” economy
in Brazil thus calls for appropriate, and effective land-use policies. Agricultural intensification on
one hand can meet the world demand for soy and beef. For example we calculate that increasing
the meat content of cattle can reduce emissions from deforestation up to 30%, but intensification
may also accelerate further deforestation of Cerrado and Amazon forests. In order to avoid such
additional deforestation, large areas of degraded lands have to be taken back into production,
which requires large agricultural investments. In addition, (new) economic instruments, monitoring,
law enforcement and appropriate conservation policies are also needed to halt further deforestation
and biodiversity loss. The recently amended change of the Forest Code policy, for example, is
expected to accelerate deforestation further, thus making more difficult to reach mitigation targets
for the Brazilian State.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

René Verburg, Agricultural Economics Research Institute - LEI-Wageningen UR

LEI, Wageningen UR PO Box 29703 2502 LS The Hague The Netherlands.

Diego Lindoso, Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB

Universidade de Brasília, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasília - DF, Brazil.

Nathan Debortoli, Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB

Universidade de Brasília, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasília - DF, Brazil.

Saulo Rodrigues Filho, Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB

Universidade de Brasília, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Brasília - DF, Brazil.

References

ANGELSEN, A. (2010) Policies for reduced
deforestation and their impact on agricultural
production. PNAS, v. 107, p. 19639”“19644.
ANGELSEN, A. and KAIMOWITZ, D. (1999)
Rethinking the Causes of Deforestation: Lessons
from Economic Models. The World Bank
Research Observer, v. 14, p. 73-98.
CARPENTIER, C. L., VOSTI, S. A. and
WITCOVER, J. (2000) Intensified production
systems on western Brazilian Amazon settlement
farms: could they save the forest? Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment, v. 82, p. 73”“88.
FAO AND WORLDBANK (2009) Awakening
Africa’s sleeping giant. Prospects for commercial
agriculture in the Guinea savannah zone and
beyond. (Washington DC, Rome, The World
Bank, FAO).
FEARNSIDE, P. M., RIGHI, C. A., LIMA DE
ALENCASTRO GRACA, P. M., KEIZER, E. W.
H., CLEMENTE CERRI, C., MELO NOGUEIRA,
E. and IMBROZIO BARBOSA, R. (2009)
Biomass and greenhouse-gas emissions from landuse
change in Brazil’s Amazonian ‘‘arc of
deforestation’’: The states of Mato Grosso and
Rondonia. Forest Ecology and Management,
v. 258, p. 1968”“1978.
IAASTD (2008) Agriculture at a Crossroads - The
global report. In B. D. MCINTYRE, H. R.
HERREN, J. WAKHUNGU and R. T. WATSON
(eds). (Washington DC, International Assessment
of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and
Technology).
IAC (2004) Realizing the promise and potential
of African agriculture- Sceince and technology
strategies for improving agricultural productivity
and food security in Africa. (Amsterdam,
InterAcadamy Council).
KAIMOWITZ, D. and ANGELSEN, A. (2008)
Will livestock intensification help save Latin
America’s tropical forests? Journal of
Sustainable Forestry, v. 27, p. 6-24.
KAMPHUIS, B., ARETS, E., VERWER, C., VAN
DEN BERG, J., VAN BERKUM, S. and HARMS,
B. (2010) Dutch trade and biodiversity. Biodiversity
and socio-economic impacts of Dutch trade in
soya, palm oil and timber. (Wageningen/The
Hague, Wageningen UR).
MARENGO, J. (2006) On the Hydrological Cycle
of the Amazon Basin: A historical Review and
Current State-of-the-Art. . Revista brasileira de
meterologia, v. 3, p. 1-19.
NOBRE, C. and NOBRE, A. (2002) O balanço
de Carbono na Amazônia Brasileira. Estudos
Avançados, v. 16, p. 81-90
PBL (2010) Rethinking Global biodiversity
strategies. Exploring structural changes in
production and consumption to reduce
biodiversity loss. In B. TEN BRINK (ed). (The
Hague/Bilthoven, PBL, Netherlands
Environmental Assessment Agency).
RODRIGUES FILHO, S., BURSZTYN, M.,
DALBONI, J., SIMONI, J., HELENAA, I.,
DEBORTOLI, N. S., LINDOSO, D., BAKKER,
F., DE ALBUQUERQUE FURTADO, B., SARAIVA,
D., AGUILAR STØEN, M., NESHEIM,
I. and MCNEILL, D. (2010) D13.1 Description
of the pre-modelling phase concluding with the
procedure for integrated impact assessment in the
case study of Brazil. LUPIS project, EU 6th Framework Programme, contract no. 36955,
www.lupis.eu.).
SCHEER, H. (2006) Energy Autonomy. The
Economic, Social and Technological Case for
Renewable Energy, Earthscan/James & James).
SOARES-FILHO, B., ANE ALENCAR, A.,
NEPSTAD, D. C., CERQUEIRA, G., DEL CARMEN
VERA-DIAZ, M., RIVERO, S.,
SOLORZANO, L. and VOLL, E. (2004)
Simulating the response of land-cover changes to
road paving and governance along a major
Amazon highway: the Santare´m”“Cuiaba´
corridor. Global Change Biology, v. 10, p. 745”“
764.
VAN MEIJL, H., VAN RHEENEN, T.,
TABEAU, A. and EICKHOUT, B. (2006) The
impact of different policy environments on
agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment 114: 21-38., v. p.
VAN SOEST, D., BULTE, E. H., ANGELSEN,
A. and VAN KOOTEN, G. C. (2002)
Technological change and tropical deforestation:
a perspective at the household level. Environment
and Development Economics, v. 7, p. 269”“280.
VERBURG, R., STEHFEST, E., WOLTJER, G.
and EICKHOUT, B. (2009) The effect of
agricultural trade liberalisation on land-use related
greenhouse gas emissions. Global
Environmental Change, v. 19, p. 434”“446.
VERBURG, R., RODRIGUES FILHO, S.,
LINDOSO, D., DEBORTOLI, N., LITRE, G.,
BURSZTYN, M. (IN PREP.). The impact of
commodity prices and policy scenarios on land
use and deforestation in an agricultural frontier
of the Amazon (In prep).
WESTHOEK, H., ROOD, T., VAN DEN BERG,
M., JANSE, J., NIJDAM, D., REUDINK, M. and
STEHFEST, E. (2011) The Protein Puzzle. The
consumption and production of meat, dairy and
fish in the European Union. (The Haque, PBL.
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency).
WILKINSON, J. and HERRERA, S. (2010a)
Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. The
Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 37, p. 749”“768.
WILKINSON, J. and HERRERA, S. (2010b)
Biofuels, climate change and sustainability in Brazil.
Instituto Interamericano de Cooperacao para a
Agricultura (IICA), Escritorio Brasil).

Downloads

Published

2011-12-21

How to Cite

Verburg, R., Lindoso, D., Debortoli, N., & Rodrigues Filho, S. (2011). Towards a low carbon economy in the Amazon:: the role of land-use policies. Sustainability in Debate, 2(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v2n2.2011.5820

Issue

Section

Dossier

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.