Teoria das Minorias Ativas:
Pressupostos, Conceitos e Desenvolvimento.
Mots-clés :
Teoria das minorias ativas,, Influência social, Modelo funcionalista, Modelo genéticoRésumé
RESUMO - Este artigo faz uma revisão da literatura corrente sobre a Teoria das Minorias Ativas (TMA), de Serge Moscovici, organizando-a como um corpo teórico integrado. Para a contextualização histórico-analítica, situa a TMA na área da influência social, procedendo a uma análise sobre os modelos funcionalista e genético que estão na base das interpretações teóricas. Enfoca, então, a constituição da TMA em termos de seus pressupostos, categorias explicativas, campo de pesquisa e desenvolvimento.
Téléchargements
Références
Editora Nacional.
Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations,
London: Academic Press.
Billig, M. (1984). Political ideology: Social psychological aspects.
Em H. Tajfel (Org.), The social dimension (pp. 449-465). New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Byrne, D. & Close, G.L. (1967). Effective arousal and attraction.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 638.
Del Prette, A. (1993). Comportamento coletivo como fenômeno
psicológico-social. Psicologia: Argumento, 11, 11-24.
Doms, M. & VanAvermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority
influence and conversion behavior: A replication. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 283-292,
Forgas, J.P. (1990). Affective influence on individual and group
judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 441-
453.
Hollander, E.P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance
of influencer. Journal of Ahnormal and Social Psychology,
61, 360-367.
Israel, J. (1972). Stipulations and construction in the social sciences.
Em J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Orgs.), The context of social psychology
(pp. 123-211). New York: Academic Press.
Jurberg, M.B. (1991). Minorias ativas e influência social. Anais do
3° Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Intercâmbio Científico,
Águas de São Pedro: ANPEPP, 171-177.
Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American
Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
Latané, B. & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and
minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
Leme, M.A.V.S. (1991). O músico independente: um estudo de um
movimento social. Anais do 3oSimpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa
e Intercâmbio Científico, Águas de São Pedro: ANPEPP, 178-
182.
Leyens, J.P. (1988). Psicologia social. Lisboa: Edições 70.
Maass, A & Clark III, R.D. (1983). Internalization versus compliance:
Differential processes underlying minority influence and
conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13,45-55.
Maass, A. & Clark III, R.D. (1984). The hidden impact of minorities:
Fourteen years of minority influence research. Psychological
Bulletin, 95, 423-450.
Maass, A., Clark III, R.D. & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of
differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority
influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12,
89-104.
Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. Em
J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Orgs.), The context of social psychology
(pp. 17-68). New York: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. New
York: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1979). Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris:
Press Universitaire de France.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. Em
L. Berkowitz (Org.). Advances in experimental social psychology
(Vol. XIII, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. & Faucheaux, C. (1972). Social influence, conforming
bias, and study of active minorities. Em L. Berkowitz
(Org.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. VI,
pp. 150-202). New York: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. & Lage, E. (1976). Studies in social influence: III.
Majority versus minority influence in a group. European Journal
of Social Psychology, 6, 149-174.
Moscovici, S. & Lage, E. (1978). Studies in social influence in
context of original judgement. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 8, 349-365.
Moscovici, S., Lage, E. & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a
consistent minority on the response of a majority a collor
perspective task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
Moscovici, S. & Neve, P. (1973). Studies in social influence II:
Instrumental and symbolic behavior. European Journal of Social
Psychology, 3, 461-47'4.
Moscovici, S. & Personnaz, B. (1980). Minority influence and
conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Social
Psychology, 16, 272-282.
Moscovici, S. & Personnaz, B. (1991). Studies in social influence
VI: Is Lenin orange or red? Imagery and social influence.
European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 101-118.
Mugny, G. (1975). Negotiation, image of the other and process of
minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5,
209-220.
Mugny, G. (1979). A rejoinder to Paicheler: The influence of
reactionary minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology,
9, 223-225.
Mugny, G (1982). The power of minorities. New York: Academic
Press.
Mugny, G. (1984a). El poder de Ias minorias. Madri: Editorial
Alianza.
Mugny, G. (1984b). The influence of minorities: Ten years later.
Em H. Tajfel (Org.), The social dimension (Vol. II, 498-514).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mugny, G., Kaiser, C, Papastamou, S. & Perez, J.A. (1984).
Intergroup relations, identifícation and social influence. British
Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 317-322.
Nemeth, C, Swedlund, M. & Kanki, B. (1974). Patterning of the
minority's responses and their influence on the majority. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 53-64.
Nemeth, C. & Wachtler, J. (1973). Consistency and modification
of judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9,
65-79.
Paicheler, G. (1977). Norms and attitude change: II. The fenomenon
of bipolarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7,
5-14.
Sachadev, I. & Bourhis, R.Y. (1991). Power and status differentials
in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of
Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
Sampson, E.E. (1981). Cognitive psychology as ideology. American
Psychologist, 36, 730-743.
Sigall, H. (1970). The effects of competition and consensual validation
on a comunicator's leaking for the audience. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 16,25]-258.
Sorrentino, R.M., King, G. & Leo, G. (1980). The influence of the
minority on perception: A note on a possible alternative explanation.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 293-
301.
Steiner, I.D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social
psychology? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10,
94-108.
Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. Em J. Israel & H. Tajfel
(Orgs.), The context of social psychology: A criticai assessment
(pp. 69-119). New York: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuais and groups in social psychology.
British Journal of Social and Clinicai Psychology, 18,183-190.
Tanford, S. & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal
integration of research on majority and minority influence
process. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
Zimbardo, P.G. & Leippe, M.R. (1991) The psychology of altitudes
change and social influence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wahrman, R. & Pugh, M.D. (1972). Competence and conformity:
Another look at Hollander' study. Sociometry, 35, 370-386.