Evaluation of the Effect of Different Substrates on the Development of Euterpe edulis (Mart.) and Roystonea regia (Kunth)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v8i2.49556Keywords:
vegetative growth, juçara palm and king palm, rice husk, diferent substratesAbstract
The study was conducted from January to September 2009 in a greenhouse at Embrapa Temperate Climate Experiment Station Cascata/RS. There is no silvicultural information aboutE. edulisandR. regia. ruled on this region of the state, therefore, is necessary to seek a system enabling expand production of palm trees. The objective was to evaluate the effect of different substrates on initial plant growth ofE. eduliandR. regia. The treatments were: T1, Plantmax ®, T2, forest soil, T3, loamy soil; T4, forest soil / clay soil 1:1; T5, soil bush / carbonized rice husk 3:1; T6, soil bush / carbonized rice husk 1:1; T7, soil bush / rice husk fresh 1:1; T8, loamy soil / carbonized rice husk 3:1; T9, loamy soil / carbonized rice husk 1:1; T10, loamy soil / rice husk in natura 1:1. The design was randomized block design with four replications and four plants per plot. The evaluations were performed at biweekly intervals. It was observed E.edulis good vegetative growth T2 and T3.R. regia, there was good responses T5, T1, T6 and T10. We conclude that the use of forest soil substrates or clay soil mixture, and rice husk raw or charred, presented good vegetative growth.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 autor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.