Territorial planning and Renewed Geography, facing socio-spatial inequalities in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v8i15.55746Keywords:
Territorial planning. Renewed Geography. socio-spatial inequalities. Latin America. geographical solidarity.Abstract
This article examines how Renewed Geography can improve contemporary spatial planning, emphasizing the importance of critiquing some of practices and theories. Facing growing crises resulting from selective uses of territory that exacerbate socio-spatial inequalities, it is essential for geographical science to commit to solving problems and developing methods that encompass more complex social and territorial relations. Territorial planning must include different geographical scales, taking into account lessons learned from the past—ranging from authoritarian periods to recent experiences—while also focusing on public participation to address current crises. The article highlights the importance of understanding the interactions between social and spatial organization and underscores the relevance of three types of events (homologous, complementary, and hierarchical) for more effective planning. Finally, the necessity of understanding the relationships between space and place is emphasized, along with the use of recent technical and scientific potentials for more sovereign planning in the Global South.
Downloads
References
Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics: The geographical mediation of state and society. Boston and London: Allen & Unwin.
Alderman, J. & Goodwin, G. (2022). The social and political life of Latin American infrastructures. University of London Press, Centre for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Institute of Modern Languages Research, School of Advanced Study, University of London. https://doi.org/10.14296/gljm4371
Alraouf, A. (2021). The new normal or the forgotten normal: contesting covid-19 impact on contemporary architecture and urbanism. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-Ijar, 15(1), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-10-2020-0249
Awudu, N., Nguh, B. & Kimengsi, J. (2020). Urban planning challenges and prospects in nkambe town, northwest region of cameroon. Journal of Geography Environment and Earth Science International, 24(5), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2020/v24i530230
Bango, J. (2016). The social construction of space. In S. Low (Ed.). Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place (pp. 80-105). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671277-10
BNamericas. (2024, Setembro 27). Destaque: o projeto de infraestrutura mais difícil para Sheinbaum. MeBNamericas. https://www.bnamericas.com/pt/feature/destaque-o-projeto-de-infraestrutura-mais-dificil-para-sheinbaum
Borges, A. (2023, Junho 29). Itaipu na ditadura: mais de 100 operários mortos e 43 mil acidentes na construção. A Pública. https://apublica.org/2023/06/itaipu-na-ditadura-mais-de-100-operarios-mortos-e-43-mil-acidentes-na-construcao/
Braga, S. (2021, Janeiro 22). Pioneiras da ciência: 7ª edição. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/programas/mulher-e-ciencia/pioneiras-da-ciencia-1/pioneiras-7a-edicao
Cabral, V. (2021). Corredor Interoceânico do Istmo de Tehuantepec. GeoPUC, 14(27), 168-192. https://geopuc.geo.puc-rio.br/media/v14n27a8.pdf
Cardoso, T. (2024, Fevereiro 5). A nova linha de trem interoceânica do México para rivalizar o canal do Panamá. Atlas Report. https://atlasreport.com.br/a-nova-linha-de-trem-interoceanica-do-mexico-para-rivalizar-o-canal-do-panama/
Casey, E. (1996). Getting back into place. Human Studies, 19(4), 433-439. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20011127
Chen, S., Gingras, Y., Arsenault, C. & Larivière, V. (2014). Interdisciplinarity patterns of highly‐cited papers: a cross‐disciplinary analysis. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101108
Costa, E. & Steinke, V. (2014). Brasília: meta-síntese do poder e controle territorial no Brasil. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 493(44). https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/ScriptaNova/article/view/15033
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Donald, B. & Gray, M. (2018). The double crisis: in what sense a regional problem?. Regional Studies, 53(2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1490014
Dunford, M. & Liu, W. (2016). Uneven and combined development. Regional Studies, 51(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1262946
Durkheim, É. (2010). Da divisão do trabalho social (4. ed.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Escámez Sánchez, J. (2010). Ortega y Gasset. Fundação Joaquim Nabuco, Editora Massangana. (Coleção Educadores).
González Rego, R. (2018). Dinámica socio-espacial de las formas urbanas en La Habana. PatryTer, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v1i1.7100.
Gorelik, A. (2005). A produção da cidade latino-americana. Tempo Social, revista de sociologia da USP, 17(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702005000100005.
Gough, J. (2014). The difference between local and national capitalism, and why local capitalisms differ from one another: a marxist approach. Capital & Class, 38(1), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816813514211
Guimarães, M. (2011, Março 2). Após 37 anos, usina de Yacyretá é inaugurada. O Estado de S. Paulo. https://www.estadao.com.br/economia/apos-37-anos-usina-de-yacyreta-e-inaugurada-imp/
Hadjimichalis, C. & Hudson, R. (2013). Contemporary crisis across europe and the crisis of regional development theories. Regional Studies, 48(1), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
Harrison, J., Galland, D. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). Regional planning is dead: long live planning regional futures. Regional Studies, 55(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
Hu, Z. & Lu, D. (2016). Re-interpretation of the classical geopolitical theories in a critical geopolitical perspective. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(12), 1769-1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1357-1
Huizar-Flores, J. (2023, Março 7). A second Panama Canal in the making. Medium. https://huizarflores.medium.com/a-second-panama-canal-in-the-making-704f13e65b23
Kakderi, C., Komninos, N., Panori, A. & Oikonomaki, E. (2021). Next city: learning from cities during covid-19 to tackle climate change. Sustainability, 13(6), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063158
Li, P. (2024). Innovative applications of artificial intelligence in agricultural land planning. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 4(6), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.54691/beer5c47
Liu, C. (2024). Impact of the new international land–sea transport corridor on port competition between neighboring countries based on a spatial duopoly model. Applied Sciences, 14(5), 18-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051857
MacDonald, J. (1975). Progress in Planning. Pergamon Press Ltd. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0305900679900102
Massey, D. (1994). A global sense of place. In D. Massey (Ed.). Space, place and gender (pp. 146-156). Oxford: Polity.
Matus, C. (1987). Política, planificación y gobierno. Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES).
Matus, C. (1991). O plano como aposta. São Paulo em perspectiva, 5(4), 28-42.
Mayne, A. (2011). Beyond metrics: reappraising york’s hungate “slum”. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15(4), 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-011-0155-9
Mosciaro, A. & Pereira, R. (2019). Reinforcing uneven development: The financialisation of Brazilian urban redevelopment projects. Urban Studies. 56(10), 2160-2178 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019829428
Müller, J. & Colloredo‐Mansfeld, R. (2018). Introduction: popular economies and the remaking of china–latin america relations. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 23(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12339
Ogun, T. (2010). Infrastructure and poverty reduction: implications for urban development in nigeria. Urban Forum, 21(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-010-9091-8
Oliveira, M. (2006). O ISEB e a construção de Brasília: correspondências míticas. Sociedade e Estado, 21(2), 487-512. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69922006000200008
Orueta, F. & Fainstein, S. (2008). The new mega‐projects: genesis and impacts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00829.x
Oteíza, T. & Castro, C. (2019). Dictatorship and the Cold war in official Chilean history textbooks. In B. Christophe, P. Gautschi & R. Thorp (Ed.). The cold war in the classroom: international perspectives on textbooks and memory practices (pp. 221-247). London: Springer Nature.
Pacheco, M.. & Schicchi, F. (2022). Porto Maravilha: Entre a imagem e a memória. Risco: Revista de Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Urbanismo (Online) (20). https://doi.org/10.11606/1984-4506.risco.2022.183421
Porto, G. & Vitiello, M. (2020). Entrevista com a professora doutora Maria Adélia Aparecida de Souza - Parte I. Geosul, 35(76), 731-760. https://doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2020v35n76p731
Prigogine, I. (1996). O fim das certezas: tempo, caos e as leis da natureza. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Rivière d'Arc, H. & Schneier, G. (1983). Activités informelles et espace : le cas des villes nouvelles de Ciudad Guayana (Venezuela) et Camacari (Brésil). Tiers-Monde, 24(95), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.1983.4318
Roberts, M. (2020). The crisis of capitalism in the 21st century. Revista Linhas, 21(46), 16-49. https://doi.org/10.5965/1984723821462020016
Rua, S. (2015). Estrategias de marketing territorial aplicadas a un gran proyecto urbano desde la perspectiva de sus actores: el caso de puerto madero en buenos aires. In VII Seminario Internacional de Investígación en Urbanismo. Catalunya, España: Editora da Universidad de la República. https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6168
Saives, A., Charles‐Pauvers, B., Schieb-Bienfait, N. & Michel, B. (2018). Lieuité et socialisation organisationnelle: les raisons du lieu pour les travailleurs de très petites entreprises créatives et culturelles. Management International, 21(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.7202/1052496ar
Salamanca, E., Johnson, R. & Duhamel, F. (2016). Political risk traps in latin america. European Scientific Journal Esj, 12(5), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n5p205
Santos, M. (1969). De la géographie de la faim à la planification régionale. Revue Tiers Monde, 10(37), 95-114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23587270
Santos, M. (1978). Espaço e dominação. Associação dos Geógrafos Brasileiros, Seção Regional de São Paulo.
Santos, M. (1979). Espaço e sociedade. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes Ltda.
Santos, M. (1986). O trabalho do geógrafo no Terceiro Mundo. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Santos, M. (2003). Economia espacial: críticas e alternativas. São Paulo: Edusp.
Santos, M. (2004). Por uma geografia nova: Da crítica da geografia a uma geografia crítica. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Santos, M. (2004a). O espaço dividido. São Paulo: Edusp.
Santos, M. (2006). A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, razão e emoção (4. ed. 2. reimpr.). Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Santos, M. (2008). O lugar: encontrando o futuro. RUA: Revista De Urbanismo E Arquitetura (6). Recuperado de https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/rua/article/view/3113
Santos, M. (2011). Geografia e planejamento: O uso do território – geopolítica. Revista Eletrônica: Tempo - Técnica - Território, 2(2), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.26512/ciga.v2i2.15414
Santos, M. (2023). A responsabilidade social dos geógrafos. Revista Contexto Geográfico, 7(15), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.28998/contegeo.7i15.14698
Sigler, T. (2016). After the World City has Globalised: Four Agendas Towards a More Nuanced Framework for Global Urban Research. Geography Compass, 10(9), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12276
Silvestre, G. & Jajamovich, G. (2022). The afterlives of urban megaprojects: grounding policy models and recirculating knowledge through domestic networks. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40(7), 1455-1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221082411
Smas, L. and Schmitt, P. (2020). Positioning regional planning across europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 778-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
Souza, M. (1979). Planificação regional: Elementos para a análise do tema IV: A experiência Brasileira de planejamento regional. Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo.
Souza, M. (2003). Entrevista. In M. Buss, L. Scheibe, I. Sostizzo, E. Machado, & S. Furtado (Entrevistadores), Geosul, 18(35), 17-35
Souza, M. (2009). Meio ambiente e desenvolvimento sustentável: As metáforas do capitalismo. Cronos, 10(2), 101-117. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/cronos/article/view/328
Souza, M. (2011). Introduzindo polêmicas: A importância das ciências humanas e sociais na contemporaneidade. GeoTextos, 7(1), 187-199.
Souza, M. (2015). As humanidades e a universidade: crise e futuro. Biblos - Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Coimbra, 1(3), 31-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/0870-4112_3-1_2
Souza, M. (2015a). Entrevista com Maria Adélia de Souza. Revista de Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Urbanismo do Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo - IAU/USP, 14(2), 90-97.
Souza, M. (2019). Território usado, rugosidades e patrimônio cultural. PatryTer, 2(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26512/patryter.v2i4.26485
Souza, M. (2021). A Geografia Renovada e a compreensão do mundo atual: teoria e método. Boletim Alfenense de Geografia, 1(1), 21-56. https://doi.org/10.29327/243949.1.1-2
Souza, M. (2021a). Geografia e planejamento: uma estratégia espaço tempo. Sociedade e Território, 33(1), 7–30
SUFRAMA - Superintendência da Zona Franca de Manaus (2024, Setembro 11). Suframa e Embaixada do Peru promovem evento sobre Porto de Chancay para debater integração sul-americana. https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/noticias/suframa-e-embaixada-do-peru-promovem-evento-sobre-porto-de-chancay-para-debater-integracao-sul-americana#:~:text=O%20Porto%20de%20Chancay%2C%20previsto,%24%2018%2C4%20bilh%C3%B5es
Topalov, C. (1979). La urbanización capitalista. México: Editorial Edicol.
Tulumello, S. (2015). Reconsidering neoliberal urban planning in times of crisis: urban regeneration policy in a “dense” space in lisbon. Urban Geography, 37(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1056605
Turrado, V. (2013). Zonas portuárias na mira da cidade global: Reflexões sobre o caso do Rio de Janeiro. Libertas: R. Fac. Serv. Soc., 13(2), 33-54. Disponível em: http://portomaravilha.com.br/conteudo/revistas/Boletim
Vizeu, F., Meneghetti, F. & Seifert, R. (2012). Por uma crítica ao conceito de desenvolvimento sustentável. Cadernos Ebape Br, 10(3), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-39512012000300007
Wang, D., Fu, Y., Liu, K., Chen, F., Wang, P. & Lu, C. (2021). Automated urban planning for reimagining city configuration via adversarial learning: quantification, generation, and evaluation. J.Acm. 37(47), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2112.14699
Yázigi, E. (2014). Regiões solidárias para o turismo. THIJ - Tourism and Hospitality International Journal, 3(1), 121-135
Yázigi, E. (2014a). Subsídios por uma teorização sobre o conceito de região solidária no turismo. Cenário, 2(3), 11-29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PatryTer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Please be advised that Revista Patryter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.
Authors who publish in the PatryTer Magazine agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal. When submitting the article, authors should attach as a supplementary document a Letter addressed to the PatryTer's Editor, indicating the academic merits of the submitted work (relevance, originality and origin of the article, that is, from what type of research]. This letter must be signed by all authors.
- Authors assign the copyright of the work that they present to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine, which may serve the article in the PatryTer Magazine and in public and private databases in Brazil and abroad.
- Authors declare that they are fully responsible for the entire contents of the contribution that they submit to the Editorial Board of PatryTer Magazine.
- Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could interfere in the impartiality of the scientific papers submitted to the PatryTer Magazine Editorial Board.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
