Feuerbach, religion and post-theism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v13i1.59240Keywords:
Feuerbach, Religion, post-theism, Hegel, Naturalism, De BottonAbstract
How subject and object relate is perceived differently. This has been identified and discussed by philosophers. Hegel built on Plato’s notion that true reality only exists in ideas and is, therefore, objectively true. Hegel argued that the world we encounter is the objectification of the divine mind. Empiricists argue that material things can be engaged through the senses and are, therefore, real. But how do we know that spiritual things are real since they cannot be engaged through the senses? Feuerbach reacted against the Enlightenment thoughts of his time by postulating that god is not real since it is a projection of human qualities. Feuerbach inverted Hegel’s theory by stating that the divine is an abstraction and reification of human thought. With this theory, Feuerbach stated that religion is human-made and redundant.
Feuerbach’s theory of the non-existence of god was created during the 19th century and corresponds with post-theism. De Botton also denies the existence of god, but declared that religion has many valuable functions for society. Feuerbach, from a philosophical and De Botton, from a sociological perspective, both deny the existence of god, but differ on the role religion play in society. Feuerbach’s theories proves to have relevance to current studies of
religion.
Downloads
References
ABENGAÑA, R., 2018, ‘Against consolations, Alain De Botton, and the demand for
accessibility,’ Epoché, viewed 04 July 2022, from https://epochemagazine.org/15/
against-consolations-alain-de-botton-and-the-demand-for-accessibility/.
ADRIAANSE, H.J., 2000, ‘After theism’, in H.A. Krop, A.L. Molendijk & H. De Vries (eds.), Post-theism: Reframing the Judeo-Christian tradition, pp. 33–61, Peeters, Leuven.
CHIDESTER, D., 2016, ‘Material culture’, in R.A. Segal & K. Von Stuckrad (eds.), Vocabulary for the study of religion, Brill, Leiden.
DE BOTTON, A., 2012, Religion for atheists: A non-believer’s guide to the uses of religion, Penguin Books, London.
DURKHEIM, E., [1912] 2008, The elementary forms of religious life, Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
ENGELS, F., [1888] 2000, Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy, ProQuest Ebook, Ann Arbor, MI.
FEUERBACH, L., 1908, Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion nebst Zusätzen und
Anmerkungen, Frommanns Verlag, Stuttgart.
FEUERBACH, L., 2008, The essence of Christianity, Dover Publications, New York, NY.
GOOCH, T., 2020, ‘Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, viewed 08 March 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/ludwig-feuerbach.
HARVEY, V., 1995, Feuerbach and the interpretation of religion, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
HEGEL, G.W.F., [1820] 1979, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts: Naturrecht und
Staatwissenschaft in Grundrisse, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
KAHL, J., 1999, ‘Ludwig Feuerbachs Beitrag zu einer Philosophie des Naturalismus’, in
Aufklärung und Kritik Sonderheft 3/1999, viewed 28 March 2022, from www.kahlmarburg.privat.t-online.de/kahl_lf.pdf.
NIPKOW, K.E., 2001, ‘The human image of God – reflections on a Paradox’, in Z. HansGeorg, F. Schweitzer, H. Häring and D. Browning (eds.), The human image of God,
pp. 29–40, Brill, Leiden.
RUSSELL, B., [1946] 2004, History of western philosophy, Routledge, London.
SCHLEIERMACHER, F., 1991, Über die Religion: Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren
Verächtern, 7th durchgesehene Auflage (Ausgabe von Rudolf Otto), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
SCHWÖBEL, C., 1994, ‘After post-theism’ in S. Andersen (ed.), Traditional theism and its modern alternatives, pp. 161–196, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus.
SPINOZA, B., 1994, Ethics, transl. E. Curley (ed.), Penguin Books, London.
STOKER, W. & Van Der Merwe, W.L., (ed.), 2012, Looking beyond? Shifting views of transcedence in philosophy, theology, art and politics, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
SWINBURNE, R., 1977, The coherence of theism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
VAN DER MERWE, J., 2011, ‘Ludwig Feuerbach die antropoloog’, Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 51(3), 319–332.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
