THE WORLD IN PARADOX

FIELDS OF SENSE ONTOLOGY AND THE OUTLINES OF “PARADOXISM"

Autores/as

  • Gabriel Cruz UFRRJ

Palabras clave:

Markus Gabriel, Fields of Sense Ontology, Metaphysical Reductionism, Paradox

Resumen

Markus Gabriel’s Fields Of Sense Ontology (FOS) is a theory molded to uphold pluralism in its most radical form. If the project succeeds, it seems that a lot of benefits would follow for ontology in general. One example is the solution it provides for “negative existentials”. Another one is the reality attributed to fictional objects through FOS’s pluralistic base. Be that as it may, his project is threatened by a series of criticisms directed at it. Among those, some appear to follow the same line: Gabriel seems to commit himself to the entity that is the heart of a strong reductionist system, that is, “the world”. As Meillassoux, Priest and Moss argue, Gabriel seems, in one way or another, to be a reductionist “despite itself”. In our reading this problem can be solved if we reorientate the place of the “non-contradiction principle” in Gabriel’s system. Our endeavor will lead us, finally, to a deviant form of FOS that places the paradox at the center of the system. This form of FOS we call “paradoxism” which rellies in the “paradox of paradox” as its foundation (and lack of it).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

BRASSIER, R. Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

BRASSIER, R; GRANT, I. H; HARMAN, G; MEILLASSOUX; Q. “Speculative Realism” MACKAY, R. Collapse III; Urbanimic Media LTDA, 2007, p.306-449.

CASTRO, Ernesto. Postcontinental Realism: Ontology and Epistemology for the Twenty-First Century. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck: 2022.

CRUZ, Gabriel. “A consistência do Niilismo Metametafísico de Gabriel (ou a falta dela)” In BOBSIN, M. (org) IX Semana dos Alunos e das Alunas da Pós-graduação em Filosofia do PPGFIL-UFRRJ 2023. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PPGFIL-UFRRJ, 2024, p.8-34

DA COSTA, N. KRAUSE, D. Notas de lógica: Parte I: Lógicas proposicionais Clássica e Paraconsistente. Florianópolis, 2004.

FERRARIS, Maurizio. Manifesto of New Realism. New York: New York University Press, 2014.

______. “Sistema do hiper-realismo transcendental.” in GABRIEL, M. O sentido da existência. Para um novo realismo ontológico. Trad. BETHONICO, B. R. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2016(b), p.11-20

GABRIEL, M. Eu não sou cérebro: filosofia do espírito para o século XXI. Trad. MACHADO, L. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2018.

______. Fields of Sense: A new realist ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2015.

______. Neutraler Realismus. Munique: Philosophisches Jahrbuch, 2016c.

______. O sentido da existência: Para um novo realismo ontológico. Trad. BETHONICO, B. R. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2016(b).

______. O sentido do pensar: A filosofia desafia a inteligência artificial. Trad. MACHADO, L. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2021.

______. O ser mitológico da reflexão - Um ensaio sobre Hegel, Schelling e a contingência da necessidade. In: Mitologia, Loucura e Riso. A subjetividade no idealismo alemão. Trad. Silvia Pimenta Velloso Rocha. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Civilização Brasileira, 2012.

______. Porque o mundo não existe. Trad. HEDIGER, M. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2016(a).

______. “Saying What is Not.” in Finkelde, D; Livingston, P. M. (org.): Idealism, Relativism, and Realism: New Essays on Objectivity Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter, 2020b, p.217-232.

______. “Some thoughts on “some thoughts on Everything”(Which are not about Everything) In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022, p.83-95.

______. Transcendental Otology: Essays in German Idealism. New York: Continuum Studies in philosophy, 2011

______.; HORN, Cristoph; KATSMAN, Anna; KRULL, Wilhelm; LIPPOLD, Anna Luísa; PELLUCHON, Corine; VENZEKE, Ingo. Towards a New Enlightenment. The Case for Future-Oriented Humanities. Alemanha: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, 2022.

______; PRIEST, G. “Everything, Nonsense and Wittgenstein” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022a, p.128-137.

______. “Existence” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022b, p.99-109.

______. “Intentionality” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022c, p.110-119.

______. “Non-Wellfoundedness” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022d, p.120-127.

______. “Nothingness” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022e, p.138-151.

GLASGOW, J; BROCK, S. “The paradox paradox” in Synthese, 2022.

GRANT, I.H. “Foreword” In: FERRARIS, M. Introduction to New Realism. Londres: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

______. Philosophies of Nature after Schelling.London: Continuum, 2006.

HARMAN, G. “Foreword” In. FERRARIS, M. Manifesto of New Realism. New York: New York University Press, 2014.

______. O objeto Quádruplo: uma metafísica das coisas depois de Heidegger. (trad) PINHO, T. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Eduerj, 2023.

______. “Series Editor’s Preface”. In GABRIEL, M. Fields of Sense: A new realist ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2015, p.vi-ix.

______. Speculative realism: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.

______. Tool Being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. U.S.A.: Open Court, 2002.

MEILLASSOUX, Q. Depois da finitude: ensaio sobre a necessidade da contingência. (trad) LAZZARETTI, Lucas. São Paulo: 7 letras, 2022.

MOSS, G. S. Hegel’s foundation free metaphysics: the logic of singularity. New York: Routledge, 2020.

______. “Transcending Everything” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022, p.153-189.

PRIEST, G. In Contradiction. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2006.

RALON, L. “Introduction” In GABRIEL, M; PRIEST, G. Everything and Nothing. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022, p.1-15.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-12-20

Cómo citar

CRUZ, Gabriel. THE WORLD IN PARADOX: FIELDS OF SENSE ONTOLOGY AND THE OUTLINES OF “PARADOXISM". Das Questões, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/dasquestoes/article/view/55113. Acesso em: 21 dic. 2024.