Teaching and learning STEM disciplines
A process perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/dasquestoes.v7i7.27485Palavras-chave:
Active Learning, Cooperative pedagogy, STEM disciplines, Alfred N. Whitehead, SynesthesiaResumo
STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, mathematics), have the particular feature of being based on theoretical and practical skills. Learning in the laboratory naturally focuses on the student who must do or create something, alone or in a small group, while benefiting from the teacher's supervision to gain good practices. In this context, the project’s status at the end of the session enables the students to assess the quality of their works themselves. During the project’s development process, they face the resistance of the problem that requires a solution. They use their know-how, mobilize the knowledge acquired in all areas of life, and solicit the resources of their group to optimize cognitive resources. Discoveries during the process and the project’s completion, together with the repetition of the exercises, provide intense pleasure and boost self-esteem. The next challenge is to transpose the dynamics from the laboratory to the hall. This challenge is reinforced by the emergence of a new generation of students, for whom interacting with the Internet and virtual agents is a natural part of their lives. In this perspective, Whitehead's thinking remains a resource that reminds us of what is essential in the educational process. It allows us to preserve this essential in today’s societal change. We show that the educational process has two important dimensions. The first relates to a crucial event in the individuation process, namely, the advent of a phenomenon of synesthesia in the subject, in the form of an acute awareness of what is important to her or him. This event is a turning point in the student's life. The second relates to the methodology, which, in Whitehead's case, takes the form of the ternary rhythm of education. We illustrate these two dimensions in a biology teaching project we call inverted funnel. Inspired by Whiteheadian pedagogy, the project takes advantage of the dynamics of romance-precision-generalization, and we hope that it will contribute to the emergence of the turning point in the student. This event is the very starting point of the educational process, the one that leads to the very nature of the learner. Such watershed not only purports to determine the direction of her or his educational process, but also that of his or her entire life.
Downloads
Referências
ALEVEN Vincent, MCLAREN Bruce, ROLL Odo and KOEDINGER, Kenneth. Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In. LESTER, J. C. VICARI, R. M and PARAGUACU, F. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 2004 p. 227-239.
BACKLUND Per and HENDRIX Maurice. Educational games are they worth the effort? A literature survey of the effectiveness of serious games. In Games and virtual worlds for serious applications (VS-GAMES), 2013 5th international conference on (pp. 1-8). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/VS-GAMES.2013.6624226
BEGG Michael, DEWHURST David and MCLEOD, Hamish. Game-Informed Learning: Applying Computer Game Processes to Higher Education. Innovate: Journal of Online Education: Vol. 1: Iss. 6, Article 6, 2005. Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss6/6
BELPAEME Tony, KENNEDY, James, RAMACHANDRAN, Aditi, SCASSELL,,ATI, Brian and TANAKA, Fumihide. Social robots for education: A review. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat5954, 2018.
BOYLE E. Elizabeth, HAINEY, Thomas, CONNOLLY, Thomas, M., GRAY Grant, EARP, Jeffrey, OTT, Michela, LIM, Theodore, NINAUS, Manuel, RIBEIRO, Claudio, and PEREIRA, João. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 94, C, 178-192, 2016. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003
BROWNELL S. E. and TANNER K D. 2012. Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and. . .Tensions with Professional Identity? CBE””Life Sciences Education Vol. 11, 339”“346. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.
CAZALIS, Roland. Ignatian and Whiteheadian Educational Processes: A Dialogue, in BERVE, A. and MAASSEN, H. (Eds) A. N. Whitehead’s Through a New Prism, Newcastle: CSP Publishing. p. 224-242, 2016.
GIROTTO, Victor, LOZANO, Cecil, MULDNER, Kasia, BURLESON, and WALKER Erin. Lessons Learned from In-School Use of rTAG: A Robot-Tangible Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 919-930, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858454
KAPP Karl M. The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game- based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 2012.
KE, Fengfeng. A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. Gaming and Simulations: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications. IGI Global, p. 1619-1665, 2011.
LEO TAN Wee-Hin. and SUBRAMANIAM Ravi. Science Education: The Paradigm Shift. Science, 2001. ,https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2001/09/science-education-paradigm-shift.
MAYO, Merrilea J. Video Games: A Route to Large-Scale STEM Education? Science 323, 79, 2009. DOI: 10.1126/science.1166900
MORRIS, Bradley J., CROKER, Steve, ZIMMERMAN, Corrinne, GILL, Davin, and ROMIG, Connie. 2013. Gaming science: the “Gamification” of scientific thinking. Front. Psychol. v. 4:607, 2013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00607.
SINGER, Maxine. Great Teachers for STEM. Science 325:1047, 2009.
WHITEHEAD, Alfred North. Adventure of Ideas. The Free Press, 1967a.
WHITEHEAD, Alfred North. The Aims of Education. New York: The Free Press, 1967b.
WHITEHEAD, Alfred North. Mode of Thought. New York: The Free Press, 1968.
ZHONGXIU, Peddycord-Liu, CATETÉ, Veronica, VANDENBERG, Jessica, BARNES, Tiffany, LYNCH Collin F. and RUTHERFORD, Teomara. A Field Study of Teachers Using a Curriculum-integrated Digital Game. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), May 4”“9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2019, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300658
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.