Urban road cyclability: indicators for the municipality of Belo Horizonte - MG, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n2.2023.48691Keywords:
Cyclability, Urban mobility, Active Transport, Non-Motorized TransportAbstract
How people move around in large Brazilian cities reflects a process of production and appropriation of urban space. The transport system is characterised by the increasing rate of individual motorisation and the precariousness of public transport services. The general objective of this paper is to evaluate the level of road cycling in the city of Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais/Brazil, based on the proposition and analysis of indicators to assess the degree of adequacy of urban roads for bicycle use as a transport mode. The results indicate that many of the roads in Belo Horizonte have good cycling levels. Given its topography and climate, these findings go against commonly held views that consider the municipality inappropriate for cycling as a mode of transport. In reality, Belo Horizonte has a very underused high cycling potential, especially if there were investments to expand the exclusive/preferred road infrastructure.
Downloads
References
BAROUCHE, T. O. O caos da mobilidade urbana: uma análise do atual regime de financiamento do transporte público municipal e a necessidade da construção de novos paradigmas. Publicação do XXIII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DO CONPEDI/UFSC, 2014, p. 404-425.
BOTMA, H. Method to Determine Level of Service for Bicycle Paths and Pedestrian-Bicycle Paths. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995.
BRASIL. Lei 12.587, de 3 de janeiro de 2012. Institui as diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 2012.
BUEHLER, R.; DILL, J. Bikeway networks: a review of effects on cycling. Transport Reviews, 2016, p. 1-19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
CARDOSO, L. Transporte público, acessibilidade urbana e desigualdades socioespaciais na Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte (Tese de Doutorado) – Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2007.
DAVIS, J. Bicycle Safety Evaluation. Auburn University, City of Chattanooga, and Chattanooga–Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission, Chattanooga, Tenn, 1987.
DILL, J.; CARR, T. Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major US Cities: if you build them, commuters will use them – Another Look, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2003.
DIXON, L. B. Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 1996. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153800101
DOWLING, R. G. et al. Report 616: multimodal level of service analysis for urban streets multimodal level of service analysis for urban streets. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, 2008.
ELIOU, N.; GALANIS, A.; PROIOS, A. Evaluation of the bikeability of a Greek city: case study "city of volos". Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development, v. 5, n. 8, 2009, p. 545–555.
FHWA. Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are and Are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes. Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation McLean, VA, 2002.
FONSECA, D. F.; LOBO, C.; GARCIA, R. A. Imposto predial e territorial urbano: uma metodologia de ajuste tributário para Belo Horizonte/MG. Urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, v. 9, p. 513-526, 2017. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.009.003.AO10
FORESTER, J. Effective cycling, 6th ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
FULLER, D. et al. Impact Evaluation of a Public Bicycle Share Program on Cycling: a case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec. American Journal of Public Health, v. 103, n. 3, e85–e92, 2013. Available at: https://doi. org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300917
HANSEN, W. G. Accessibility and residential growth. Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1959.
JENSEN, S. Pedestrian and Bicyclist Level of Service on Roadway Segments. In Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, N.. 2031. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, 2007. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3141/2031-06
JONES, S. R. Accessibility measures: a literature review. Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Laboratory Report 967, 1981.
KRENN, P. J.; OJA, P.; TITZE, S. Development of a Bikeability Index to assess the bicycle friendliness of urban environments. Open J. Civil Eng. v. 5, 2015, p. 451–459. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2015.54045
LANDIS, B. W. Bicycle Interaction Hazard Score: a theoretical model. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 1994.
LESSA, D. A. et al. Accessibility and urban mobility by bus in Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais - Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 77, 2019, p. 1-10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.04.004
LOTT, D. Y.; TARRDIFF, T.; LOTT, D. F. Bicycle Transportation for Downtown Work Tripes: a case study in Davis, California. Transportation, Research Record: Jornal of the Transportation, Washington, DC, 1977.
MANUM, B. et al. Modelling Bikeability: space syntax based measures applied in examining speeds and flows of bicycling in Gothenburg. Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, 2017.
MARTENS, K. The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research. Part D, 2004, p. 281-294. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005
NIELSEN, T. A. S.; SKOV-PETERSEN, H. Bikeability – Urban structures supporting cycling. Effects of local, urban and regional scale urban form factors on cycling from home and workplace locations in Denmark. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, p. 36-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.015
NOBREGA, R. A. A. Mapa de declividade da malha viária de Belo Horizonte. 2016.
NORDSTRÖM, T.; MANUM, B. Measuring bikeability: space syntax based methods applied in planning for improved conditions for bicycling in Oslo. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, 2015.
PEREIRA, R. et al. O uso da sintaxe espacial na análise do desempenho do transporte urbano: limites e potencialidades. Texto para Discussão, n. 1630. Rio de Janeiro: Ipea, 130, 2011.
PEZZUTO, C.; SANCHES, S. Identificação dos fatores que influenciam o uso da bicicleta, visando ao direcionamento de programas cicloviários. Revista dos Transportes Públicos – ANTP, Ano 25, 2003.
PUCHER, J.; BUEHLER, R. Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, v. 28, n. 4, 2008, p. 495–528. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612
RIETVELD, P.; DANIEL, V. Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter? Transp. Res. Part. A Policy. Pract., v. 38, 2004, p. 531–550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003
RYBARCZYK, G.; WU, C. Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Applied Geography, v. 30, n. 2, 2010, p. 282–293. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.005
SENER, I.; ELURU, N.; BHAT, C. Who Are Bicyclists? Why and How Much Are They Bicycling? Transportation research record, v. 2134, 2009, p. 63–72. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3141/2134-08
SISSON, S. B. et al. Suitability of Commuting by Bicycle to Arizona Elementary Schools. American Journal of Health Promotion, v. 20, n. 3, 2006, p. 210–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-20.3.210
SORTON, A.; WALSH, T. Bicycle Stress Level as a Tool to Evaluate Urban and Suburban Bicycle Compatibility. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, 1994.
SOUZA, P. B. Análise dos fatores que influenciam o uso da bicicleta para fins de planejamento cicloviário. Tese apresentada à Escola de Engenharia da Universidade de São Carlos, 2012.
SZYSZKOWICZ, S. S. Bikeability as an Indicator of Urban Mobility. Economic Analysis Directorate Transport Canada Place de Ville, Tower C Ottawa, 2018.
TRALHÃO, L. et al. Metodologia em ambiente SIG para localizar dispositivos de auxílio ao ciclista em cidades declivosas. Presented at the 2015. Coimbra, 2015.
TURNER, S.; SHAFER, S.; STEWART, W. Bicycle Suitability Criteria for State Roadways in Texas. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2012.
VASCONCELLOS, E. A. Transporte urbano, espaço e equidade. São Paulo: Fapesp, 1996.
VIOLA, P. D. et al. Potencial de viagens por bicicleta em Belo Horizonte: uma proposta metodológica com base na Pesquisa Origem e Destino de 2012. Revista Transporte y Territorio, n. 20, p. 370-386, 2019. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.34096/rtt.i20.6397
WAHLGREN, L. Exploring bikeability in a metropolitan setting: stimulating and hindering factors in commuting route environments. School of Health and Medical Sciences: Örebro University, 2011. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-168
WINTERS, M. Mapping bikeability: a spatial tool to support sustainable travel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, v. 40, 2013, p. 865 – 883. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/b38185
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
