A soft systems approach for innovation in the fruits and vegetables market in Uruguay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.47425Keywords:
Systems thinking, farmers, markets, innovation, sustainable developmentAbstract
"Systems thinking" approaches include some techniques and methods developed by social scientists to encourage debate, recognising that their practice is inevitably full of value and that research is a part of intervention. In general, systems theories explain the need to transcend disciplines to increase our understanding of a situation by considering different levels of impact, especially through visualisation tools. In a very complex environment such as the fruit and vegetable market in Uruguay, especially focusing on the roles of agents and the interactions between them, "soft systems methodologies"contributed to building a representation integrating different perspectives with consensual and conflicting aspects, delving into the particularities and opportunities for technological innovations and collaborative management for the fruit and vegetablechain, ending in important reflections on opportunities for positive change and the risks of marginalisation or social exclusion.
- Commercial channels for farm products and main agents
- Particularities of Uruguayan consumption
- Alternative channels, collaborative management and other innovations: for whom?
It is considered that this approach contributes to building a holistic vision of the situation that will facilitate our understanding of the commercial circumstances in rural Uruguay (Checkland 1999). In particular, we discuss innovations promoted by the recent crisis linked to the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and the challenges posed by climate change, questioning the proposal of generating " value added " with the idea of "integral valuation".
Downloads
References
ACKERMAN, M. N. et al. Estudio de canales y márgenes en la cadena comercial de frutas y hortaliza frescas en Uruguay [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP [cited 2021 Sep 22]. 2017. 186p.
ALLUB, L. Aversión al riesgo y adopción de innovaciones tecnológicas en pequeños productores rurales de zonas áridas: un enfoque causal. Estudios sociológicos, p. 467-493. 2001.
ATKINSON, R.; FLINT, J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, v. 33, p. 1-5. 2001.
BERNAL, J. D. The social function of science. 1939. 482p.
BIANCO, M. La innovación en los estudios sociales de procesos agropecuarios: evolución y énfasis en Latinoamérica. Agrociencia Uruguay [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 17 [cited 2023 Apr. 5], v. 24, n. 1, p. e346. Available from: https://agrocienciauruguay.uy/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/346
BOVE, M. I.; CERRUTI, F. Los alimentos y bebidas en los hogares: ¿Un factor de protección o de riesgo para la salud y el bienestar de los uruguayos? Encuesta Nacional de Gastos e Ingresos de los Hogares 2005-2006. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2008.
CARENZO, S. Territorio, identidades y consumo: reflexiones en torno a la construcción de nuevos paradigmas en el desarrollo. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, v. 26, p. 125-143. 2007.
CASTELLANO, A.; GOIZUETA, M. E. El valor agregado en origen como política de desarrollo agroalimentario y agroindustrial. Realidad económica, 306, p. 104-129. 2016.
CHAMPREDONDE, M.; BORBA, M. F. S. Diferenciar productos locales contribuyendo al desarrollo territorial. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura. Montevideo, IICA. 2015.
CHAMPREDONDE, M.; COSIOROVSKI, J. G. ¿Agregado de valor o valorización? Reflexiones a partir de Denominaciones de Origen en América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Viticultura, Agroindustria y Ruralidad, v. 9, n. 3, p. 147-172. 2016.
CHECKLAND, P. Systems thinking. Rethinking management information systems, p. 45-56. 1999.
CHECKLAND, P.; SCHOLES, J. Soft systems methodology in action. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 1999.
CORTELEZZI, A. Situación y perspectivas de las cadenas agroindustriales 2018-2019. Anuario Opypa, Montevideo: MGAP, p. 15-42.
COURDIN, V. Procesos de coordinación de la acción colectiva en la ganadería familiar de Uruguay. Sustainability in Debate. Brasília, v. 12, n. 1, p. 206-219. 2021.
ELLIS, F. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. 2000. 40p.
FAGGIAN, R.; SPOSITO, V. A. Systemic Regional Development: a systems thinking approach. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2009, Brisbane, Australia. 2009.
FAO. Pérdida y desperdicio de alimentos en el mundo: alcance, causas y prevención. Roma. 2012. 33p
GÓMEZ ORTIZ, R. El liderazgo empresarial para la innovación tecnológica en las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas. Pensamiento & Gestión, v. 24, p. 157-194. (2008). Available at: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-62762008000100007&lng=en&tlng=es. Accessed on: February 23, 2023.
GOULET, F. et al. Sistemas y políticas de innovación para el sector agropecuario: elementos de introducción. Rio de Janeiro: e-papers; p. 5-21. 2019.
ID RETAIL. Cinco dilemas del consumidor en pandemia. Un análisis de Id Retail sobre el mercado y el consumidor en el contexto Pandemia y «Nueva normalidad». p. 50-52. Montevideo, Uruguay. 2021.
IMPULSA INDUSTRIA. Investigación de hábitos y comportamiento de consumo de alimentos en Uruguay. Cámara de Industrias del Uruguay (CIU) & Instituto Nacional de Empleo y Formación Profesional (INEFOP). n. 1, p. 121-132. 2020.
IRIARTE, D. Localidad de Villa Vil: de la relocalización como razón científico-técnica hacia la emergencia de una teoría local del conocimiento. Estudios sobre el ambiente y el territorio, n. 8. 2013.
JIMÉNEZ, J. C.; SÁNCHEZ, J. G.; AGUILAR, F. G. Guía técnica para la construcción de cuestionarios. Odisea – Revista electrónica de Pedagogia, v. 6, n. 3, 2006.
KOTLER, P.; ARMSTRONG, G. Marketing. 14. ed. Pearson Educación, México. Administración. 2012. 720p.
LAMARCA, E.; MAIDANA, R.; VIERA, C. Análisis de los canales de comercialización de frutas y hortalizas en el Uruguay. [Tesis de bachiller inédita]. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administración. UdelaR. 2009.
LAS DIFICULTADES de agregar valor. Diario Concepción. Universidad de Concepción, Chile. 2018. Available at: https://www.diarioconcepcion.cl/opinion/2018/07/11/las-dificultades-de-agregar-valor.html
LÓPEZ, D.; MUÑOZ, F. Diversificación y agregación de valor, desafíos pendientes de la política económica en América Latina: perspectivas de análisis. Ciclos en la historia, la economía y la sociedad, v. 24, n. 44, p. 46-68. 2015.
LOUE, S.; MOLINA, D. P. Las consideraciones éticas sobre la vulnerabilidad en la investigación cualitativa. Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública: el escenario para la salud pública desde la ciencia, v. 33, n. 11. 2015.
LUNDVALL, B. A. National system of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. 1992.
MATURANA, H. Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, v. 9, p. 25-82. 1988.
MERCADO POPULAR DE SUBSISTENCIA. Cómo surge el Mercado Popular de Subsistencia. 2022. [cited 2023 Jan 08]. Available from: https://mps.org.uy/como-surge-el-mercado-popular-de-subsitencia/
MGAP, DIEA. Censo General Agropecuario 2011 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2014 [cited 2022 Dec 08]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3Fw8OpU.
MGAP, DIEA. Estado de situación de los Registros de la Agricultura Familiar en Uruguay. Montevideo: MGAP; 2020. 33p.
MGAP, DIEA. Anuario Estadístico Agropecuario 2021 [Internet]. Montevideo: MGAP; 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 02]. 261p. Available from: https://bit.ly/3pyPJhp.
MIDGLEY, G. Systems Thinking for the 21st Century, in Systemic Intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice, springer, p. 249-56. 2000.
MIDGLEY, G. Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York, Springer. 2001. 461p.
O'BRIEN, K. L.; LEICHENKO, R. M. Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate
change within the context of economic globalisation. Global environmental change, v. 10, n. 3, p. 221-232. 2000.
OBSERVATORIO GRANJERO. Anuario Estadístico. Unidad Agroalimentaria Metropolitana (UAM). Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP), Dirección General de la Granja (DIGEGRA). 2021.
PALERMO, H.; MANUEL, H.; VENTRICI, P. Creativos, divertidos, emprendedores y meritocráticos: el trabajo en contexto de las tecnologías de la información. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, v. 52; n. 11; p. 37-53. 2020.
PANNELL, D. J.; MALCOLM, L. R.; KINGWELL, R. S. Are We Risking Too Much? Perspectives on Risk in Farm Modelling. Agricultural Economics, v. 23, n. 1, p. 69-78. 2000.
ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1983. 367p.
ROSSI, V.; NOTARO, J. La Comisión Nacional de Fomento Rural y su resistencia como sujeto colectivo «alternativo» en el agro uruguayo (1999-2014). Pampa, Santa Fe, v. 14, p. 59-90. 2016.
SUÁREZ, O. M. Schumpeter, innovación y determinismo tecnológico. Scientia et technica, v. 2, n. 25. 2004.
UNITED NATIONS. The 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: an opportunity for Latin America and the Caribbean (LC/G.2681-P/Rev.3), Santiago, 2018.
URUGUAY. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica 2017. Encuesta Nacional de Gastos e Ingresos de los Hogares 2016-2017. Montevideo, INE. Available at: https://www.ine.gub.uy/encuesta-de-gastos-e-ingresos-de-los-hogares-2016. Accessed on: March 4, 2023.
VON BERTALANFFY, L. General System Theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: Georges Braziller, Inc. 1968. 296p.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Healthy food. 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet [2023 Jan 4].
ZOPPOLO, R.; COLNAGO, P. Producción de frutas y hortalizas en Uruguay a la luz del Año Internacional de las Frutas y las Verduras de la FAO. Agrociencia Uruguay [Internet], v. 25, n. NE2. 2021. Available from: http://agrocienciauruguay. uy/ojs/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/982
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.