Emergency funding public policy for disaster response in Brazil from 2013 to 2017

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n2.2020.31268

Abstract

Public financial aid policies for disaster response actions are a poorly studied topic. This article analyzed information extracted from the databases of the State of Emergency and State of Public Calamity decrees and the costs of disaster relief and response in Brazil, in the period 2013-2017, based on its spatial-temporal distributions. Disaster relief and response costs are also used in a cross-analysis with municipal indicators such as the Human Development Index (HDI) and the per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). It was identified that spending exceeded R$ 800 million. State civil defences accounted for most of the resources used (76.4%). In a universe of 564 municipalities that used financial assistance via the Civil Defense Payment Card, a concentration of 40% of resources was found in 30 municipal civil defences, some of which in municipalities with high HDI and GDP per capita.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Victor Marchezini, Cemaden, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Doutor e Mestre em Sociologia pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia na Universidade Federal de São Carlos (PPGS/UFSCar), onde também se formou em Ciências Sociais. É especialista em Direitos Humanos, Gestão Global de Risco e Políticas Públicas de Prevenção de Desastres, pela Fundação Henry Dunant (Chile), e membro do Comitê de Pesquisa em Sociologia dos Desastres, na Associação Internacional de Sociologia (ISA). É professor no Programa de Doutorado em Ciência do Sistema Terrestre (PGCST/INPE) e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desastres (ICT/Unesp-Cemaden). Atualmente é pesquisador no Cemaden/MCTI.

Adriano Mota Ferreira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil

Doutorando do Programa de Pós Graduação em Desastres,  Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil. Mestre em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental.

 

Glauston Roberto Teixeira de Lima, Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil.

Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alertas de Desastres Naturais, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil.

Demerval Aparecido Gonçalves, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil

Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, SP, Brasil

References

BANCO MUNDIAL. Avaliação de Perdas e Danos: inundações bruscas em Santa Catarina ”“ novembro de 2008. Brasília: Banco Mundial, 2012a.

BANCO MUNDIAL. Avaliação de Perdas e Danos: inundações bruscas em Pernambuco ”“ junho de 2010. Brasília: Banco Mundial, 2012b.

BANCO MUNDIAL. Avaliação de Perdas e Danos: inundações e deslizamentos na Região Serrana do Rio de Janeiro ”“ janeiro de 2011. Brasília: Banco Mundial, 2012c.

BRASIL. Instrução Normativa nº 02, de 20 de dezembro de 2016. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.mdr.gov.br/images/stories/ArquivosDefesaCivil/ArquivosPDF/legislacao/Anexo-VI---Conceitos.pdf>. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2019.

BRASIL. Ministério da Integração Nacional. Módulo de formação: resposta, gestão de desastres, decretação e reconhecimento federal e gestão de recursos federais em proteção e defesa civil para resposta. Apostila do instrutor. Brasília-DF, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.mdr.gov.br/images/stories/ArquivosDefesaCivil/ArquivosPDF/publicacoes/II---Resposta---Livro-Base.pdf>. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2019.

BRASIL. Política Nacional de Defesa Civil. Brasília: Sedec, 2007.

CARVALHO, D. W. Desastres ambientais e sua regulação jurídica: deveres de prevenção, resposta e compensação ambiental. 2. ed. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters, 2020.

CARVALHO, J. M. Cidadania no Brasil: o longo caminho. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2002.

CASTRO, A. L. C. Glossário de Defesa Civil: estudos de riscos e medicina de desastres. 5. ed. Brasília: Sedec, 2004.

CHAMBERS, R. Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS bulletin, v. 20, n. 2, p. 1-7, 1989.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÃSTICA. PIB per capita [2017]. IBGE Cidades. 2017. Disponível em: <https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/>. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2019.

KELLETT, J.; CARAVANI, A.; PICHON, F. Financing Disaster Risk Reduction: towards a coherent and comprehensive approach. 2014. Disponível em: <https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9027.pdf>. Acesso em: 07 jul. 2019.

MARCHEZINI, V. Campos de desabrigados: a continuidade do desastre. São Carlos: RiMa, 2014.

MARCHEZINI, V.; SARTORI, J.; GONÇALVES, J. C. Desenvolvimento, Desastres e Reconstrução: o caso de São Luiz do Paraitinga/SP, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional, v. 13, p. 202-226, 2017.

PROGRAMA DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil 2013. Disponível em: <https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/idh0/rankings/idhm-municipios-2010.html>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2019.

PROGRAMA DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO. O que é o IDH. Brasília: Pnud, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/idh0/conceitos/o-que-e-o-idh.html>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2020.

TIERNEY, K. Disaster governance: social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 37, p. 341-363. 2012.

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Human Development Report 2019. Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: inequalities in human development in the 21st century. New York: UNDP, 2019. Disponível em: <http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf>. Acesso em: 05 jul. 2020.

UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR DISASTER REDUCTION. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: making development sustainable. The Future of Disaster Risk Reduction, UN, New York, 2015.

VALENCIO, N. F. L. S. Desastres no Brasil: a face hídrica do antidesenvolvimento. In: VALENCIO, N. F. L. S.; SIENA, M. Sociologia dos Desastres: construção, interfaces e perspectivas. Volume IV. São Carlos: Rima Editora, 2014. p. 109-148.

VIEIRA, R. M. S. P. et al. Characterizing spatio-temporal patterns of social vulnerability to droughts, degradation and desertification in the Brazilian northeast. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 2020.

WALLEMACQ, P.; HOUSE, R. Economic Losses, Poverty & Disasters. 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.preventionweb.net/files/61119_credeconomiclosses.pdf>. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2019.

WILCHES-CHAUX, G. La vulnerabilidad global. In: MASKREY, A. (Org.). Los desastres no son naturales, 1993, p. 11-41. LA RED: Panamá.

WISNER, B.; GAILLARD, J. C.; KELMAN, I. Framing disaster: theories and stories seeking to understand hazards, vulnerability and risk. In: ______. The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. p.18-34. London: Routledge, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Marchezini, V., Ferreira, A. M. ., Teixeira de Lima, G. R., & Gonçalves, D. A. (2020). Emergency funding public policy for disaster response in Brazil from 2013 to 2017. Sustainability in Debate, 11(2), 266–303. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n2.2020.31268

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020): Sustainability in Debate / Sustentabilidade em Debate

Section

Articles - Varia

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Sustentabilidade em Debate

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement

The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)