Formação da Nova Geopolítica das Mudanças Climáticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v4n1.2013.9211Keywords:
Climate change, Geopolitics, International negotiations, North-South debate, CooperationAbstract
This paper presents the evolution on climate change negotiations towards a more inclusive and
efficient global agreement, and how the main countries position and group themselves, to show
that the geopolitical configuration of climate change has been changed. North-South divergence,
settled in terms of development, shaped for a long time the course of negotiations, including the
basis for the structure of the international environmental order of climate change through the
“common but differentiated responsibilities” principle. However, the present state of climate
negotiations shows that such North-South division gave place to an assembly of countries defined
in terms of spatialization of greenhouse gases emissions. A greater scientific knowledge on the
causes and consequences of climate change, raised by the research and reports published by IPCC,
and a shift on the world scenery defined by the power games between great powers are elements
that help us to investigate a shift on climate change geopolitics. The geopolitics we observe nowadays
opposes the great GHG emitters to countries with expressive and growing emissions, but that are
not able, separately or in small groups, of exerting power enough, at a global level, to alter
international outcomes.
Downloads
References
BAILEY, I. Copenhagen and the new political geographies of climate change. Political
Geography, n.29, p. 127-129, 2010.
BARNETT, J. The Geopolitics of climate change.GeographyCompass. p. 1361-1375, 2007.
BRASIL. Senado Federal. Subsecretaria de Edições Técnicas. Protocolo de Quioto
legislação correlata. Brasília, 2004. v.3 (Coleção Ambiental). 88 p.
BRAZ, M.S.A. Os Mecanismos de Cooperação Internacional para Redução de Emissões
sob o Protocolo de Quioto. Boletim Científico Escola Superior do Ministério
Público da União, Brasília, n.9, p.139-159, out./dez. 2003.
BRUNNÉE, J. From Bali to Copenhagen: towards a shared vision for a post-2012
climate regime?Maryland JournalofInternational Law, v.25: 86, p. 86-108, 2010.
CAPOBIANCO, J.P.R. Do Rio a Copenhague, sem escala em Kyoto. Política Externa
”“ o clima pós-Copenhague. Vol.18, n.4, mar/abr/mai 2010. P. 37-42.
COMISSÃO Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. Nosso futuro comum. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FundaçãoGetúlio Vargas, 1987.
CONFERENCE of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change, Thirteenth Sess., Bali, Indon., Dec. 3”“15, 2007, Decision 1/CP.13, Bali Action
Plan, U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1 (Mar. 14, 2008) [hereinafter Bali Action Plan],
available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/ cop13/eng/06a01.pdf#page=3.
DONINI, G. S. A aplicação do Mecanismo de Desenvolvimento Limpo no Brasil: o
caso da Novagerar. 2007. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia (Geografia Humana))
- Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, 2007.
ELLIOT, Lorraine. The Global Politics of the environment. 2nded. New York: New
York University Press, 2004.
FIGUERES, C.; IVANOVA, M. H. Mudança Climática: interesses nacionais ou um regime
global? In: ESTY, D. C.; IVANOVA, M. H. (orgs.). Governança ambiental global:
opções e oportunidades. São Paulo: Editora Senac São Paulo, 2005. p. 233-255.
GIDDENS, A. A política da mudança climática. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2010.
GOLDEMBERG, J. Copenhague: um “post mortem”. Política Externa ”“ o clima pós-
Copenhague. Vol.18, n.4, mar/abr/mai 2010. P. 15-24.
HULME, M. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy,
inaction and opportunity. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 392 p.
IPCC. Fourth Assessment Report ”“ Climate Change 2007: the Synthesis Report.
Disponível em: <http://www.ipcc.ch>. Acesso em: 12/06/2008.
KEOHANE, Robert O.; RAUSTIALA, Kal. Toward a Post-Kyoto Climate Change
Architecture: a Political Analysis. Discussion Paper 2008-01, Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, July 2008.
LAGO, A.A.C. Estocolmo, Rio, Joanesburgo: o Brasil e as Três Conferências
Ambientais das Nações Unidas. Brasília: Instituto Rio Branco; Fundação Alexandre
de Gusmão, 2007.
MARCOVITCH, J. Para mudar o Futuro: mudanças climáticas, políticas públicas e
estratégias empresariais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo e Editora
Saraiva, 2006. p. 9-121.
MOREIRA, H. M. A atuação do Brasil no regime internacional de mudanças climáticas
de 1995 a 2004. 2009. 156f. Dissertação (Mestrado) ”“ Programa de Pós
Graduação em Relações Internacionais San Tiago Dantas PUC-SP/UNESP/UNICAMP,
São Paulo, 2009.
RIBEIRO, W. C. A Ordem Ambiental Internacional. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2005. 176p.
RICUPERO, R. De Bali a Copenhague: o futuro do regime internacional sobre mudança
de clima. In: DUPAS, Gilberto; LAFER, Celso; SILVA, Carlos Eduardo Lins da. A
Nova Configuração Mundial do Poder. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2008.
SERRA, S. B. A incógnita de Copenhagen. IN: IV Conferência Nacional de Política
Externa e Política Internacional ”“ IV CNPEPI. Seminário sobre Mudanças Climáticas.
Rio de Janeiro, 19 de novembro de 2009. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de
Gusmão, 2010.
VIOLA, E. As Complexas Negociações Internacionais para Atenuar as Mudanças
Climáticas. In: TRIGUEIRO, A. (org.) Meio Ambiente no Século 21: 21 especialistas
falam da questão ambiental nas suas áreas de conhecimento. 2. ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Sextante, 2003. p. 183-197.
_________. A Evolução do Papel do Brasil no Regime Internacional de Mudança
Climática e na Governabilidade Global. Revista Cena Internacional, Brasília, n. 6,
p. 2-25, jun 2004.
_________. A Política Climática Global e o Brasil: 2005-2010. Revista Tempo de
Mundo, Brasília, v.2, n.2, p. 81-117, agosto 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
