Instituições sociais: Um diálogo entre sociologia de Chicago e filosofia pragmatista

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020005

Palavras-chave:

Instituiçoes, Ecologia humana, pragmatismo, sociologia de Chicago, empowerment, inteligência coletiva

Resumo

Este artigo volta às propostas teóricas de Robert E. Park e William I. Thomas sobre o processo de desorganização/reorganização social e a forma como isso foi tratado em algumas das dissertações de sociologia de Chicago na década de 1920. As instituições sociais eram consideradas organismos vivos que nascem, crescem e morrem e que existem através de suas transações com seus ambientes e através da gênese destas transações. Os processos básicos desta ecologia de instituições sociais, nas ordens biótica e moral, foram apreendidos com as categorias de competição e seleção, isolamento, invasão e sucessão, cooperação, parasitismo e simbiose, conflito, acomodação e assimilação. As descrições e análises estatísticas e cartográficas tornaram possível dar conta de processos ecológicos de diferenciação funcional e territorial, étnica e racial, distribuição e segregação. Esta primeira etapa, nos anos 1920-30, ajuda a entender como W. F. Whyte, H. Blumer e E. C. Hughes estudaram o processo de institucionalização de hospitais, empresas, sindicatos, igrejas e organizações de movimentos sociais nos anos 1940-60. Esta perspectiva ecológica clássica é enriquecida aqui através de seu confronto com a filosofia pragmatista – da qual Park e Thomas eram próximos. As instituições sociais, além de sua base ecológica, são tomadas como campos experimentais e matrizes culturais, que crescem em torno de tentativas de definir e dominar os problemas sociais. As noções tomadas emprestadas a Dewey de razão pública, inteligência coletiva e aprendizagem coletiva pelas comunidades de debatedores, investigadores e experimentadores, entram em jogo. As instituições sociais são acumuladores, condensadores e geradores de experiência, know-how e conhecimento: elas empoderam ou des-empoderam seus membros ou beneficiários. Tal conjunto de questões nos permite abordar numa nova perspectiva algumas questões de sociologia das organizações.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Daniel Cefai, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales

Daniel Cefaï é diretor de estudos na Ehess, pesquisador no Centro de Estudo dos Movimentos Sociais (Cems); é cofundador e diretor de redação da revista Pragmata (https://revuepragmata.wordpress.com/les-numeros). Suas áreas de estudo abarcam a história da sociologia nos Estados Unidos, particularmente a pesquisa de campo (L’Engagement ethnographique, Paris: Éditions de l’Ehess, 2010) e a sociologia da ação pública, das mobilizações coletivas e dos problemas públicos, em uma perspectiva pragmatista (Pourquoi se mobilise-t-on? Paris: La Découverte, 2007). Criou a Bienal de Etnografia da Ehess e pesquisou sobre a questão dos moradores de rua (L’urgence sociale en action: ethnographie du Samusocial de Paris. Paris: La Découverte, 2011). Coeditou Arenas públicas. Por uma etnografia da vida associativa (Niterói, RJ: Editora UFF, 2011), L’Expérience des problèmes publics (com Cédric Terzi, 2012, Raisons Pratiques), e, mais recentemente, Pragmatisme et sciences sociales: explorations, enquêtes, expérimentations (SociologieS, 2015) e Problèmes, expériences, publics: une enquête pragmatiste (Sociologie et Sociétés, 2019).

Referências

ABBOTT, Andrew. Organizations and the Chicago School. In: The Oxford handbook of sociology and organization studies: classical foundations, p. 399-420. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.

______. Linked ecologies: States and universities as environment for professions. Sociological Theory, v. 23, n. 3, p. 245-274, 2005.

______. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.

ADDAMS, John. A function of the social settlement. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 13, p. 33-55, 1899.

ANSELL, Christopher. Pragmatist democracy: evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011.

ARGYRIS Chris; SCHÖN Donald. Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.

AVILES N. B. Pragmatism and social worlds analysis as a lens for studying meso-level processes in STS. In: GROSS, N.; REED, I.; WINSHIP, C. (Orgs.). The New Pragmatist Sociology: Inquiry, Agency, and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2021 (forthcoming).

BECKER, Howard S. Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1981.

BECKER, Howard S.; STRAUSS, Anselm. Careers, personality, and adult socialization. American Journal of Sociology, v. 62, n. 3, p. 253-263, 1956.

BLUMER, Herbert. Collective behavior. In: Lee, A. M. (Ed.). Principles of sociology, p. 67-121. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1951 [1939].

BOLTON, Herbert Eugene. The mission as a frontier institution in the Spanish-American colonies. The American Historical Review, v. 23, n. 1, p. 42-61, 1917.

BUCHER, Rue; STRAUSS, Anselm. Professions in process. American Journal of Sociology, v. 66, n. 4, p. 325-334, 1961.

BURGESS, Ernest W. The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. In: PARK, R. E.; BURGESS, E.; MCKENZIE, R. D. The city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1925.

BURNS L. R. The Chicago School and the study of organizational-environment relations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, v. 16, p. 342-358. 1980.

CAMPBELL, Donald T. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, v. 24, p. 409-429, 1969.

CEFAÏ, Daniel. Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas… O que nos ensina o pragmatismo. Cadernos Cebrap, Part 1, v. 36, n. 1, p. 187-213, 2017.

______. Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas… O que nos ensina o pragmatismo. Cadernos Cebrap, Part 2, v. 36, n. 2, p. 129-142, 2017.

CHISHOLM, Donald. Problem solving and institutional design. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 5, n. 4, p. 451-491, 1995.

COOLEY, Charles Horton. Social organization: a study of the larger mind (Caps. XXVIII-XXX). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909.

DALTON, Melville O. A study of informal organization among the managers of an industrial plant. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1949.

DEWEY, John. Outlines of a critical theory of ethics, in the early works, 1882-1898, Carbondale & Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, v. 3., 1969 [1891].

______. Logic: the theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1938.

______. Liberalism and social action. New York: G. P. Putnam, 1935.

______. The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt, 1927.

______. Human nature and conduct: an introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1922.

______. Reconstruction in philosophy. New York: Henry Holt & Co, 1920.

DEWEY, John; TUFTS, James Hayden. Ethics. New York: Henry Holt, 1932.

DEWEY, John; MOORE, Addison W.; BROWN, Harold Chapman; MEAD, George H.; BODE, Boyd H.; STUART, Henry Waldgrave; TUFTS, James Hayden; KALLEN, Horace M. Creative intelligence: essays in the pragmatic attitude. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1917.

EMIRBAYER, Mustafa; MISCHE, Ann. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 4, p. 962-1023, 1998.

FOLLETT, Mary Parker. Dynamic administration: the collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1942.

______. Creative experience. New York: Longman, 1924.

______. The new state: group organization, the solution of popular government. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1918.

FREEMAN, John; HANNAN, Michael. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, v. 82, n. 5, p. 929-964, 1977.

FREIDSON, Eliot. Profession of medicine. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

GEERTZ, Clifford. Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

GLICK, Clarence E. The Chinese migrant in Hawaii: a study in accommodation. Ph.D. Sociology, University of Chicago, 1938.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill 1961.

______. The presentation of self in everyday life. Chicago, IL: The Free Press, 1959.

GROSS, Matthias. Collaborative experiments: Jane Addams, Hull House and experimental social work. Social Science Information, v. 48, n. 1, p. 81-95, 2009.

GUSFIELD, Joseph R. Organizational change: a study of the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1954.

HANNAN, Michael T.; FREEMAN John. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, v. 82, n. 5, p. 929-964, 1977.

HAWLEY, Amos H. Human ecology: a theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press, 1950.

HERNES, Tor. A process theory of organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.

HIRSCHMAN, Albert O. Exit, voice, loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

HUGHES, Everett Cherrington. The growth of an institution: the Chicago Real Estate Board. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1928-1979.

______. Cycles, turning points, and careers. In: RIESMAN, D.; BECKER, H. (Orgs). The sociological eye: selected papers on institutions & race, p. 124-133. Chicago, IL; New York: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.

______. Going concerns: the study of American institutions. In: RIESMAN, D.; BECKER, H. (Orgs). The sociological eye: selected papers on institutions & race, p. 52-64. Chicago, IL; New York: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.

______. Disorganization and reorganization. Human Organization, v. 21, n. 2, p. 154-161, 1962.

______. French-Canada in transition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1943.

______. The study of institutions. Social Forces, v. 20, n. 3, p. 307-310, 1942.

______. Institutions. In: PARK, R. E. (Ed.). An outline of the principles of sociology. New York: Barnes and Nobles, 1939 (reed. A. M. Lee, New Outline, 1946).

______. Institutional office and the person. American Journal of Sociology, v. 43, p. 404-413, 1937.

______. The ecological aspects of institutions. American Sociological Review, v. 1, n. 2, p. 180-192, 1936.

JOAS, Ernst Troeltsch. The creativity of action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

LEE, Rose Hum. The growth and decline of Chinese communities in the Rocky Mountain Region. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1948.

LIND, Andrew W. An island community: ecological succession in Hawaii. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1938.

LINDEMAN, Eduard C. Social discovery: an approach to the study of functional groups. New York: Republic Publishing Company, 1924.

LORINO, Philippe. Pragmatism and organization studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.

MCKENZIE, Roderick D. Roderick D. McKenzie on human ecology. HAWLEY, A. H. (Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1968.

The concept of dominance and world-organization. American Journal of Sociology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 28-42, 1927.

______. The ecological approach to the study of the human community. American Journal of Sociology, v. 30, n. 3, p. 287-301, 1924.

MEAD, George Herbert. Mind, self, and society, from the standpoint of a social behavioris. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1934.

______. The philosophy of the present. London: The Open Court Company, 1932.

______. The social settlement: its basis and function. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Record, 1907-1908.

PARK, Robert Ezra. Readings in public opinion: its formation and control. American Journal of Sociology, v. 34, n. 6, p. 1192-1194, 1929.

______. Human nature and collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, v. 32, n. 5, p. 695-703, 1927.

______. The natural history of the newspaper. American Journal of Sociology, v. 29, n. 3, p. 273-289, 1923.

PARK, Robert Ezra; BURGESS, Ernest W. Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1921.

PARK, Robert Ezra; MILLER, Herbert Adolphus, (& THOMAS, W. I.). Old world traits transplanted, Cap. 6: “Immigrant institutions”. New York: Henry Holt, 1921.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, p. 286-302, 1878.

REDFIELD, Robert. The folk culture of Yucatán. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1941.

______. Tepoztlán, a Mexican village: a study in folk life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1930.

RICŒUR, Paul. Temps et récit, v. 1. Paris: Les Éditions du Seuil, 1984.

ROY, Donald. Restriction of output by machine operators in a piecework machine shop: a preliminary analysis. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1952.

SHIDELER, Ernest Hugh. The chain store: a study of the ecological organization of a modern city. PhD Sociology and Anthropology, University of Chicago, 1927.

SIU, Paul. The Chinese laundryman: a study in social isolation. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1953.

SPECTOR, Malcolm; KITSUSE, John. Constructing social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1977.

STRAUSS, Anselm. Continual permutations of action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993.

STRAUSS, Anselm; SCHATZMAN, Leonard; BUCHER, Rue; EHRLICH, Danuta; SABSHIN Melvin. Psychiatric ideologies and institutions. New York: Free Press, 1964.

SUMNER, William Graham. Folkways: a study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston, MA: Ginn and Co, 1906.

THOMAS, William I. The province of social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 10, p. 445-455, 1905.

THOMAS, William I.; ZNANIECKI, Florian. The Polish peasant in Europe and America, v. 1 and 2. New York: Octagon, 1919-1920.

THOMPSON, Edgar Tristram. The plantation. PhD Sociology, University of Chicago, 1932.

WEICK, Karl E. Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage, 1995.

______. The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.

Downloads

Publicado

13-09-2021

Como Citar

Cefai, D. (2021). Instituições sociais: Um diálogo entre sociologia de Chicago e filosofia pragmatista. Sociedade E Estado, 36(02), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020005

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.