Pollination ecology: insights for planning and managing agroecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v19i1.51703Keywords:
diversified agroecosystems, crop-pollinator biodiversity, ecological intensification, ecosystem servicesAbstract
Considering agroecosystems as parts of multifunctional landscapes combines agriculture with ecological conservation and biodiversity, improving the dominant agricultural matrix and guaranteeing autonomous agroecosystem services, such as pollination. Here, we discuss recent insights from pollination ecology transferable to agriculture at different scales and social and economic needs.
Downloads
References
BADILLO‐MONTAÑO, Raul; AGUIRRE, Armando; MUNGUÍA‐ROSAS, Miguel A. Pollinator‐mediated interactions between cultivated papaya and co‐flowering plant species. Ecology and evolution, v. 9, n. 1, p. 587-597, 2019.
BERGAMO, Pedro J. et al. Pollination outcomes reveal negative density‐dependence coupled with interspecific facilitation among plants. Ecology letters, v. 23, n. 1, p. 129-139, 2020.
BEZERRA, Leile P.; et al. Participatory construction in agroforestry systems in family farming: ways for the agroecological transition in Brazil. Agroecology and sustainable food systems, v. 43, n. 2, p. 180-200, 2019.
BILAS, Roza D.; BRETMAN, Amanda; BENETT, Tom. Friends, neighbours and enemies: an overview of the communal and social biology of plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, v. 44, n. 4, p. 997-1013, 2021.
BLÜTHGEN, Nico; KLEIN, Alexandra M. Functional complementarity and specialisation: the role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology, v. 12, n. 4, p. 282-291, 2011.
BORCHARDT, Kate E. et al. Plant-pollinator conservation from the perspective of systems-ecology. Current Opinion in Insect Science, p. 2214-5745, 2021.
CARTAR, Ralph V. Resource-tracking by bumble bees: What explains local responses to density of bergamot (Monarda fistulosa) flowers?. Ecoscience, v. 16, n. 4, p. 470-475, 2009.
CARVALHEIRO, Luísa G. et al. The potential for indirect effects between co‐flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. Ecology letters, v. 17, n. 11, p. 1389-1399, 2014.
CHAKRABORTY, Pushan et al. Seasonal dynamics of plant pollinator networks in agricultural landscapes: how important is connector species identity in the network?. Oecologia, v. 196, p. 825-837, 2021.
CHAPAGAIN, Tejendra; LEE, Elizabeth A.; RAIZADA, Manish N. The Potential of Multi-Species Mixtures to Diversify Cover Crop Benefits. Sustainability, v. 12, n. 5, p. 2058, 2020.
EDITORIAL. To end hunger, science must change its focus. (2020, October 15). Nature, v. 586, p. 336-336. 2020.
FLETCHER, Michael-Shawn et al. Indigenous knowledge and the shackles of wilderness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 118, e2022218118, 2021.
GARIBALDI, Lucas A. et al. EDITOR'S CHOICE: REVIEW: Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology, v. 52, n. 6, p. 1436-1444, 2015.
GEMMILL-HERREN, Barbara et al. Conservation of natural and semi-natural habitat providing resources for pollinators. In Towards sustainable crop pollination services: Measures at field, farm and landscape scales, p.151-158, FAO, 2020.
GHAZOUL, Jaboury. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. Journal of ecology, v. 94, n. 2, p. 295-304, 2006.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SCIENCE-POLICY PLATFORM ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - IPBES. Assessment report on pollinators, pollination and food production. Potts S.G., Imperatriz-Fonseca V.L., Ngo H.T. (eds). Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, p. 552, 2016.
KURIAKOSE, Giby; SINU, Palatty A.; SHIVANNA, K.R. Domestication of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) in Western Ghats, India: divergence in productive traits and a shift in major pollinators. Annals of Botany, v. 103, n. 5, p. 727-733, 2009.
LAHA, Supratim et al. Exploring the importance of floral resources and functional trait compatibility for maintaining bee fauna in tropical agricultural landscapes. Journal of Insect Conservation, v. 24, n. 3, p. 431-443, 2020.
LI, Kevin et al. Critical factors limiting pollination success in oil palm: A systematic review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 28, p. 152-160, 2019.
LOSAPIO, Gianalberto et al. Plant interactions shape pollination networks via nonadditive effects. Ecology, v. 100, n. 3, e02619, 2019.
LOWDER, Sarah K.; SKOET, Jakob; SINGH, Saumya. What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world. Background paper for the State of Food and Agriculture, v. 8, p. 1-45, 2014.
MAAS, Bea et al. Transforming Tropical Agroforestry towards High Socio-Ecological Standards. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, v. 35, p. 1049-1052, 2020.
NICHOLLS, Clara I.; ALTIERI, Miguel A. Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable development, v. 33, n. 2, p. 257-274, 2013.
NINKOVIC, Velemir; MARKOVIC, Dimitrije; RENSING, Merlin. Plant volatiles as cues and signals in plant communication. Plant, Cell & Environment, v. 4, n. 4, p. 1030-1043, 2021.
PERALTA, Guadalupe et al. Trait matching and phenological overlap increase the spatio‐temporal stability and functionality of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology letters, v. 23, n. 7, p. 1107-1116, 2020.
PEREIRA FILHO, Antonio et al. Nutrient cycling in multifunctional agroecosystems with the use of plant cocktail as cover crop and green manure in the semi-arid. African Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 14, n. 5, p. 241-251, 2019.
RABESCHINI, Gabriela; NUNES, Carlos E. P.; PAREJA, Martin. The power of sister crops: intercropping courgette and common bean changes floral morphology and increases diversity of flower visitors. Biodiversity, v. 24, n. 1-2, p. 55-65, 2023.
RAHAYU, S.K.; WIJAYANTI, R; PUTRI, R.B.A. Diversity of flower visiting insects on intercropping between soybean and sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea). Indonesian Journal of Entomology, v. 15, n. 1, p. 23-30, 2018.
VARAH, Alexa et al. Temperate agroforestry systems provide greater pollination service than monoculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v. 301, n. 1, p. 107031, 2020.
VÁZQUEZ, Diego P.; CHACOFF, Natacha P.; e CAGNOLO, Luciano. Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecology, v. 90, n. 8, p. 2039-2046, 2009.
VENJAKOB, Christine; et al. Plant diversity increases spatio‐temporal niche complementarity in plant‐pollinator interactions. Ecology and evolution, v. 6, n. 8, p. 2249-2261, 2016.
WEI, Na et al. Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity. Nature, v. 597, n. 7878, p. 688-692, 2021.
YANG, Chun-F.; WANG, Qing-F.; GUO, You-H. Pollination in a patchily distributed lousewort is facilitated by presence of a co-flowering plant due to enhancement of quantity and quality of pollinator visits. Annals of botany, v. 112, n. 9, p. 1751-1758, 2013.
YE, Zhong-M. et al. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination: can pollinator abundance shift the plant–plant interactions? Plant Ecology, v. 215, n. 1, p. 3-13, 2014.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriela Rabeschini, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Nunes, Martin Pareja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aviso de direitos autorais
Os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados nesta revista permanecem com os autores, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista.
Licença
Quando publicados nesta revista de acesso aberto, licenciados por meio do CC BY 4.0, os artigos são distribuídos gratuitamente, podendo ser compartilhados e adaptados para qualquer finalidade, inclusive comercial. Como atribuição de uso, a licença exige que seja dado o devido crédito, com um link para a licença e indicação de alterações. Isso não significa que o licenciante endosse o uso das informações do artigo, ou a pessoa que usou essas informações. Implica, também a, impossibilidade de aplicação de medidas legais ou tecnológicas que restrinjam o uso da informação por terceiros.
