Agroecological analysis of two modern paradigms

Authors

  • Fernando F. Goulart Universidade de Brasília - UnB
  • John Vandermeer University of Michigan
  • Ivette Perfecto University of Michigan
  • Rodrigo P Matta-Machado Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v4i3.49038

Keywords:

theoretical ecology, conservation, agroforestry systems.

Abstract

This work reviews the contribution of agroecology to both conservation and development debate. From the ecological point of view, the misunderstanding notion of “pristiness” and “untamedeness” of natural habitats misled conservation efforts from the landscape level to the conservation units. On the other hand, developers are guided by a different, but not less fallacious, view that is biased towards the superiority of agricultural intensification compared to small scale agriculture. In Brazil the precocity of agriculture mechanization supported by the government during the 70s had catastrophic consequences to small farmers increasing rural and urban poverty. Through an agroecological perspective, both conservation and development are based in wrong concepts. Therefore, the study of agroecology, more specifically high diverse agroforestry systems, can help conserve biodiversity as well as make agricultural production in a more social responsible way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

Goulart, F. F., Vandermeer, J., Perfecto, I., & Matta-Machado, R. P. (2009). Agroecological analysis of two modern paradigms. Revista Brasileira De Agroecologia (Brazilian Journal of Agroecology), 4(3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v4i3.49038

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.