Práticas de promoção à criatividade científica entre estudantes adolescentes: uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lc29202349473Palavras-chave:
Criatividade, Adolescentes, Criatividade Científica, Revisão SistemáticaResumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar as práticas de promoção à criatividade científica entre estudantes adolescentes avaliadas em artigos empíricos publicados entre 2018 e 2022. A busca das pesquisas ocorreu em quatro bases de dados. Os resultados revelaram que as práticas demonstraram ser eficazes e estavam associadas com abordagem em ciência, tecnologia, engenharia e matemática; suporte tecnológico; métodos de ensino/aprendizagem e avaliação de características cognitivas e comportamentais dos alunos. Recomenda-se a realização de pesquisas em contextos nacionais, de modo a investigar as estratégias de incentivo à criatividade científica entre os estudantes adolescentes.
Downloads
Referências
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Braga, N. P., & Marinho, C. D. (2016). Como desenvolver o potencial criador: um guia para a liberação da criatividade em sala de aula. Vozes.
Araújo, L. S., Cruz, J. F. A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Achieving scientific excellence: An exploratory study of the role of emotional and motivational factors. High Ability Studies, 28 (2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2016.1264293
Astutik, S., Susantini, E., Madlazim, M. N., & Supeno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning models (CCL) on secondary school scientific creativity skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13336a
Ayas, M.B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
Azevedo, G. T., & Maltempi, M. V. (2023). Desenvolvimento de habilidades e invenções robóticas para impactos sociais no contexto de formação em Matemática. Ciência & Educação, 29 (2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320230016
Bacich, L., & Moran, J. (2018). Metodologias Ativas para uma Educação Inovadora: Uma Abordagem Teórico-Prática. Pensa.
Barbot, B. (2018). Creativity and self-esteem in adolescence: A study of their domain specific, multivariate relationships. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.365
Beghetto, R. A., & Madison, E. (2022). Accepting the challenge: Helping schools get smarter about supporting students’ creative collaboration and communication in a changing world. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040080
Benek, I., & Akcay, B. (2022). The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9 (2), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2
Çalışıcı, S., & Benzer, S. (2021). The effects of STEM applications on the environmental atitudes of the 8th year students, scientific creativity and science achievements. Malasian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9 (1), 24-36. https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/28217/12738
Doğan, A., & Kahraman, E. (2021). The effect of STEM activities on the scientific creativity of middle school students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1241-1266. https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/638/324
Eroglu, S., & Bektas, O. (2022). The effect of STEM applications on the scientific creativity of 9th-grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 8(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.1059124
Feist, G. J. (2020). Science. Em S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Orgs.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 460-466). Elsevier Academic Press.
Garcés, S. (2018). Creativity in science domains: A Reflection. Atenea, 517(1), 241-253. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/328/32865412015/html/
Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., Biaisi, P. M., Catherine, M. D., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (176), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00176
Gök, B., & Sürmeli, H. (2022). The effect of scientific toy design activities based on the engineering design process on secondary school students’ scientific creativity. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 692-709. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.17987
Gray, S., & Morris, P. (2022). Capturing the spark: PISA, twenty-first century skills and the reconstruction of creativity. Globalisation, Societes and Education, 6 (2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981
Haim, K., & Aschauer, K. (2022). Fostering scientific creativity in the classroom: The Concept of Flex-Based Learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21 (3), 196-230. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.3.11
Hasancebi, F. Y., Guner, O., Kutru, C., & Hasancebi, M. (2021). Impact of Stem integrated argumentation-based inquiry applications on students ' academic success, reflective thinking and creative thinking skills. Participatory Educational Research, 8 (4),274-296. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.90.8.4
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of integrated STEM education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358-379. http://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Huang, C. F., & Wang, K. C. (2019). Comparative analysis of different creativity tests for the prediction of students’scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(4), 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1684116
Huang, P. S., Peng, S. L., Chen, H. C., Tseng, L. C., & Hsu, L. C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
Idoeta, P. A. (2021, novembro 15). A surpreendente queda de criatividade em adolescentes do mundo detectada pela OCDE. BBC News Brasil. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/geral-59099276
Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., Chruszczewski, M. H., & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57 (2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006
Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067921
Kızkapan, O., & Nacaroğlu, O. (2021). An examination of relationship between gifted student’s scientific creativity and science-based entrepreneurship tendencies. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9 (1), 1-13. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/3621
Klahr, D. (2002). Exploring Science – The Cognition and Development of Discovery Process. Mit Press.
Kleibeuker, S. W., Stevenson, C. E., Van Der Aar, L., Overgaauw, S., Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., & Crone, E. A. (2017). Training in the adolescent brain: An fMRI training study on divergent thinking. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000239
Koç, A., & Büyük, U. (2021). Effect of robotics technology in science education on scientific creativity and attitude development. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 54-72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1303792.pdf
Lee, I., & Park, J. (2021). Student, parents and teacher perceptions on the behavioral characteristics of scientific creativity and the implications to enhances student’s scientific creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.67
Newman, F., & Scurry, J. E. (2015). Higher education and the digital rapids. International Higher Education, 26(1), 13-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2002.26.6968
Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., & Ramdan, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational High School Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists,8 (2), 633 – 649. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.645047
Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU). (2015). Transformando Nosso Mundo: A Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/agenda2030-pt-br.pdf
Qiang, R., Han, Q., Guo, Y., Bai, J., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Critical thinking disposition and scientific creativity: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54 (1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347
Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the autonomy of South African school science students when doing investigative inquiries for a science fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128
Redó, N. A., Gutiérrez, M. Á. M., & Cano, J. D. V. (2021). Dimensions of creativity in secondary school high-ability students. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11 (3), 953-961. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030070
Rosenzweing, E.Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792
Septaria, K., & Rismayanti, R. (2022). The effect of scientific approach on Junior High school students’ Scientific Creativity and Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Journal of Research and Education Studies: E-Saintika, 6(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i3.955
Sica, L. S., Ragozini, G., Di Palma, T., & Sestito, A. L. (2017). Creativity as Identity Skill? Late adolescents' management of identity, complexity and risk‐taking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.221
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The scientific creativity of fifth graders in a STEM project-based cooperative learning approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627
Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching 7 (2), 123-133. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/45cc/ed48ffd5dcda97944876b935c19f05917350.pdf
Suarte, L. B. O., Silva, K. L. F., & Seibert, C. S. (2021). O PISA como instrumento de análise das ciências no contexto da saúde ambiental, no âmbito internacional e nacional. Revista Humanidades e Inovação, 8(39), 309-321. https://revista.unitins.br/index.php/humanidadeseinovacao/article/view/4190
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: the impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(1), 1871-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, M., Sunarti, T. & Dwikoranto, D. (2019). Increasing students’responsibility and scientific creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), 178–188. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa/article/view/5807
Tambunan, H. (2019). The effectiveness of the problem-solving strategy and the scientific approach to students’ mathematical capabilities in high order thinking skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14 (2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Tang, C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Personal characteristics that distinguish creative scientists from less creative scientists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.99
Van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: Where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702
Vries, H. B., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184
Wai, J., & Brown, M. I. (2021). Developmental histories facilitating the emergence of creative scientific expertise: The role of developed cognitive talents, education, and social and cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716529
Yildirim, M., Çalik, M., & Özmen, H. (2016). A Meta-synthesis of Turkish studies in science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6518-6539. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115726.pdf
Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31 (3), 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Suellen Cristina Rodrigues Kotz, Asdrúbal Borges Formiga-Sobrinho
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
