The theory of rational discourse of Habermas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v3i1.12488Keywords:
Habermas, Communicative action, Theory of truth, Discourse ethics, LawAbstract
Unlike most contemporary philosophers who never developed a systematic philosophy, as aspired to the philosophers of the past, Habermas applies his theory of discourse to the whole spectr um of problems of philosophy and, although the works appear dealing with themes scattered and without unity, this article aims to show that the theory of discourse enabled the rehabilitation system in philosophy, in that it allows to judge the validity of the propositions of science in theoretical discourses so moral norms and legal rules in practical discourses, which are made from the mutatis mutandis to each case, including the order of reasons and the chronological order of the topics as did the systematic philosophers.
Downloads
References
ARAUJO, L. B. “Ética do Discurso: uma resposta aos desafios contemporâneos de uma moral pós-metafísica”. Reflexão(Campinas), Campinas - SP, v. 25, n. 76, pp. 67-73, 2000.
BAYNES, K. The normative grounds of social criticism. Kant, Rawls and Habermas. Albany, SUNY, 1992.
BERTEN, A. Porque Habermas não é e não pode ser contratualista. Ensaios Filosóficos, v. 2010, pp. 06-18, 2010.
BOHMAN, J. “Complexity, pluralism, and the constitutional state: On Habermas's Faktizität und Geltung”. Law and Society Review. /s.l./, 28(4):897-930, 1994.
DUTRA, D. V. Razão e consenso em Habermas. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC, 2005.
HABERMAS, J. Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968. Repr. in Habermas, 1994.
””Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1981. Repr. in Habermas, 1995. 2v.
””Moralbewußtsein und Kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1983. Repr. in Habermas, 1996.
””Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1984.
””Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1990. Repr. in Habermas,1992.
””Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992. Repr. in Habermas, 1994.
””Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.
INGRAN, D. Habermas and the dialectic of reason. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1987.
MELO, R.; WERLE, D. L. (orgs.). Democracia deliberativa. São Paulo: Esfera Pública, 2007.
NOBRE, M. (Org.) ; REPA, L. (Org.). Habermas e a reconstrução: Sobre a categoria central da Teoria Crítica habermasiana. 1. ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2012.
NOBRE, M. (Org.) ; TERRA, R. R. (Org.). Direito e Democracia. Um guia de leitura de Habermas. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2008.
DE OLIVEIRA, N. F. A Democracia Deliberativa segundo J. Habermas. Dois Pontos (UFPR), v. 5, pp. 4, 2008.
PINZANI, A. & DUTRA, D. V. Habermas em discussão. Florianópolis: Nefipo, 2005.
REPA, L. S. A categoria do direito no quadro da teoria da ação comunicativa. Prisma Jurídico (UNINOVE. Impresso), v. 5, pp. 183-202, 2006.
ROUANET, L. P. “Soberania e patriotismo constitucional”. Revista jurídica, Campinas, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 77-83, 2005.
SIEBENEICHLER, F. B. “A justiça como inclusão do outro”. Ethica. Cadernos Acadêmicos, Rio de Janeiro, v. 8, n. 2, 2001.
SMITH, T. The role of ethics in social theory. Essays from a Habermasian Perspective. Albany: SUNY, 1991.
TERRA, R. "Notas sobre sistema e modernidade. Kant e Habermas", Filosofia Política, Porto Alegre, 1999, nº 4, NS, pp. 58-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
