Our Issues?
A Garcian-Latourian Approach to Speculative Realist Political Theory
Palavras-chave:
Tristan Garcia, Bruno Latour, Issue-oriented politics, we-ourselves, Speculative realismResumo
Abstrato
Levi Bryant em seu artigo Speculations IV sobre “Política e Realismo Especulativo”, argumentou que as teorias críticas em geral enfatizam negativamente a relação humano-mundo. Bryant argumenta que deveria haver uma ênfase maior no mundo real (para ele o “material”). Mas não se pode perder de vista como é que nós, políticos, temos em vista essas questões reais e materiais. Neste artigo, procuro abordar o problema realista das relações políticas por meio de We Ourselves, de Tristian Garcia. O “nós” garciano é então conectado a uma teoria política realista latouriana das “questões”. Uma política orientada para questões exige que se preste atenção à trajetória das preocupações políticas e a quem exatamente essas questões dizem respeito. Em outras palavras, essas questões (que podem ser categorizadas diferencialmente para clareza analítica, como Bryant faz), de certa forma pressupõe um nós garciano que tem uma questão em vista. Esse “ter algo em vista” pode excluir o não-humano, ou o não-humano pode ser levado em consideração, dependendo de nossa concepção de “nós”. Finalmente, tento enfatizar que uma filosofia política orientada para questões requer uma teorização de sobreposição de questões ou “empilhamento”, e que a ênfase de Garcia em transparências e pilhas (de “nós”) pode ser aplicada à política realista de questões.
Downloads
Referências
Bensusan, H. 2021. Indexicalism: Realism and the Metaphysics of Paradox. Edinburgh University Press.
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. University of Minnesota Press.
Brassier, R. 2011. Concepts and Objects in Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., Harman, G. 2011. Eds. The Speculative Turn: Continental Realism and Materialism. Re.press, Melbourne: 47-65.
Bryant, L. R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Open Humanities Press, Ann Arbor.
Bryant, L. R. 2013. Politics and Speculative Realism. Speculations. 4 (1): 15-22.
Bryant, L. R. 2014. Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh University Press.
Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., Harman, G. 2011. Towards a Speculative Philosophy in Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., Harman, G. 2011. Eds. The Speculative Turn: Continental Realism and Materialism. Re.press, Melbourne: 1-18.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. The MIT Press, London. Translated by Graham Burchell.
Callon, M., Latour, B. 1981. Unscrewing the Big Leviathan; or, How Actors Macrostructure Reality, and How Sociologists Help Them To Do So in Knorr-Cetina, K., Cicourel, A.V. 1981. Eds. Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Routledge, London: 277-303.
Cogburn, J. 2017. Garcian Meditations: The Dialectics of Persistence in Form and Object. Edinburgh University Press.
Cogburn, J., RayAlexander, C., RayAlexander, A. 2018. Translators Introduction in Garcia, T. 2018. The Life Intense: A Modern Obsession: Letting Be Volume I. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Abigail RayAlexander, Christopher RayAlexander, and Jon Cogburn.
De Vries, G. 2007. What is Political in Sub-politics? How Aristotle Might Help STS. Social Studies of Science. 37 (5): 781-809.
Ferraris, M. 2012. Manifesto of New Realism. SUNY Press. Translated by Sarah De Sanctis.
Ferraris, M. 2015a. New Realism: A Short Introduction. Speculations. 5 (1): 141-167.
Ferraris, M. 2015b. Introduction to New Realism. Bloomsbury, London. Translated by Sarah De Sanctis.
Fraser, N. 1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text. 25/26 (1): 56-80.
Gabriel, M. 2015. Fields of Sense: A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh University Press.
Garcia, T. 2014a. Form and Object: A Treatise on Things. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Mark Allan Ohm and Jon Cogburn. .
Garcia, T. 2014b. Another Order of Time: Towards a Variable Intensity Of The Now. Parrhesia. 19 (1): 1-18.
Garcia, T. 2018. The Life Intense: A Modern Obsession: Letting Be Volume I. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Abigail RayAlexander, Christopher RayAlexander, and Jon Cogburn.
Garcia, T. 2021. We Ourselves: The Politics of Us: Letting Be Volume II. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Christopher RayAlexander, Abigail RayAlexander and Jon Cogburn.
Gefen, A. 2022. Posthumanist Solidarity: The Political and Ethical Imaginations of Artificial Intelligence from Battlestar Galactica to Raised by Wolves. Open Philosophy. 5 (1): 136-142.
Gunn, J. 2018. The I in Object: Selfie Culture and Object-Oriented Philosophy. Cinephile. 12 (1): 48-53.
Harman, G. 2009. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Re.press, Melbourne.
Harman, G. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Zero Books, Alresford.
Harman, G. 2014. Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political. Pluto Press, London.
Harman, G. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Hobbes, T. 1983. De Cive The English Version: Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society. Oxford University Press. Translated and Edited by Howard Warrender.
Hobbes, T. 1991. Leviathan: Revised Student Edition. Cambridge University Press. Edited by Richard Tuck.
Kaup, M. 2021. New Ecological Realisms: Post-Apocalyptic Fiction and Contemporary Theory. Edinburgh University Press.
Latour, B. 1988. The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations in Elliot, B. 1988. Eds. Technology and Social Change. Edinburgh University Press: 20-43.
Latour, B. 1990. Technology is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review. 38 (1): 103-131.
Latour, B. 2003. What if we Talked Politics a Little. Contemporary Political Theory. 2 (1): 143-164.
Latour, B. 2004a. Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 30 (1): 225-248.
Latour, B. 2004b. Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics: Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge. 10 (3): 450-462.
Latour, B. 2004c. Politics of Nature: How To Bring the Sciences Into Democracy. Harvard University Press. Translated by Cathrine Porter.
Latour, B. 2007. Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries’ Paper. Social Studies of Science. 37 (5): 811-820.
Latour, B. 2008. What is the Style of Matters of Concern?. Royal Van Gorcum, Assen.
Latour, B. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Harvard University Press. Translated by Catherine Porter.
Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight New Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press, Cambridge. Translated by Catherine Porter.
Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Polity Press, Cambridge. Translated by Catherine Porter.
Lemke, 2017. Materialism without matter: the recurrence of subjectivism in object-oriented ontology. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 18 (2): 133-152.
Malin, B.J. 2016. Communicating with objects: Ontology, Object-Orientations, and the Politics of Communication. Communication Theory. 26 (1): 236-254.
Marres, N. 2005. No issue, no publics: democratic deficits after the displacement of politics. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Amsterdam, Ipskamp Printpapers. Accessible online at https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/3890776/38026_thesis_nm_final.pdf.
Marres, N. 2007. The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy. Social Studies of Science. 37 (5): 759-780.
Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.
Meehan, K., Shaw, I.G.R., Marston, S.A. 2013. Political geographies of the object. Political Geography. 33 (1): 1-10
Meehan, K., Shaw, I.G.R., Marston, S.A. 2014. The state of objects. Political Geography. 39 (1): 60-62.
Meillassoux, Q. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Continuum, London. Translated by Ray Brassier.
Nunziante, A. M. 2018. The Lingua Franca of Nominalism: Sellars on Leibniz in Corti, L., Nunziante, A. M. 2018. Eds. Sellars and the History of Modern Philosophy. Routledge, London.
Pedinotti, A. 2013. Game of Objects: vicarious causations and multi-modal media. Communication+1. 2 (1): 1-35.
Pierides, D., Woodman, D. 2012. Object-oriented sociology and organizing in the face of emergency: Bruno Latour, Graham Harman, and the material turn. The British Journal of Sociology. 63 (4): 665-679.
Reid, E. 2022. The Dialogic Expansion of Garcia’s We: Chronotopes, Ethics, and Politics in The Expanse Series. Open Philosophy. 5 (1): 168-191.
Schmidt, J.J. 2014. The retreating space: Political geographies of the object and the proliferation of space. Political Geography. 39 (1): 58-59.
Schouten, P. 2013. The Materiality of State Failure: Social Contract Theory, Infrastructure and Governmental Power in Congo. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41 (3): 553-574.
Shaw, I.G.R., Meehan, K. 2013. Force-full: power, politics and object-oriented philosophy. Area. 45 (2): 216-222.
Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Minnesota University Press. Translated by Robert Bononno.
Stengers, I. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. Minnesota University Press. Translated by Robert Bononno.
Warner, M. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books, New York.
Whitehead, A.F. 1964. The Concept of Nature: The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College November 2019. Cambridge University Press.
Withy, K. 2011. Situation and Limitation: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness. European Journal of Philosophy. 22 (1): 61-81.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Das Questões
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
