Project management relationship to green innovation processes in sustainable fabric companies
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v12n3.2021.38922Mots-clés :
Management of Innovative Projects. Sustainable Project Management. Green Innovation. Sustainable Fabrics.Résumé
The concept of green innovation refers to innovation that seeks to make radical or progressive improvements to products or processes that contribute to sustainable development. Green innovation can improve the global image of a business and lead to better market performance. Green innovation projects can contribute to economic growth and a positive quality of life without negatively affecting the environment. Consequently, this study aims to examine the relationship between the development of green materials resulting from green innovation and project management. To achieve the research objective, we conducted a multi-case study with companies developing green innovation derived textile. The findings show that the firms surveyed do not use formal project management to execute their green innovation projects and that their project management is intuitive. Although the companies surveyed are concerned with sustainable development and strive to innovate to satisfy their customers responsibly, their project management practices are informal. This study contributes to the practice. It is possible to introduce project management into enterprises to enhance green innovation while adapting practices or using less formal and bureaucratic techniques.
Téléchargements
Références
AARSETH, W. et al. Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1071-1083, 2017.
AGARCHAND, N.; LAISHRAM, B. Sustainable infrastructure development challenges through PPP procurement process Indian perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, v. 10, n. 3, p. 642-662, 2017.
ALBINO, V.; BALICE, A.; DANGELICO, R. Environmental strategies and green product development: an overview on sustainability-driven companies. Business Strategy and Environment, v. 18, p. 83-96, 2009.
AMBEC, S.; LANOIE, P. When and why does it pay to be green? Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 23, p. 45-62. 2008.
AMINDOUST, A.; SAGHAFINIA, A. Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply
chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. J. Text. Inst., v. 108, n. 7, p. 1250-1258, 2016.
BARNES, M. Innovation – why Project management is essential to successful businesses. International Journal of Project Management, v. 9, n. 4, p. 207-209. 1991.
BOTKIN, D.; KELLER, E. Ciência Ambiental: Terra, um planeta vivo (7ª edição). Rio de Janeiro: Gen/LTC. 2011.
CANDIDO, R. Recycling of textiles and its economic aspects. Md. IBRAHIM H. M. (Ed.). In the Textile Institute Book Series. Fundamentals of Natural Fibres and Textiles. Woodhead Publishing, p. 599-624, 2021.
CARVALHO, M.; RABECHINI JÚNIOR. R. Construindo competências para gerenciar projetos: teoria e casos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas. 2011.
CHEN, L. et al. A process-level water conservation and pollution control performance evaluation tool of cleaner production technology in textile industry. J. Clean. Prod., v. 143, p. 1137-1143, 2017.
COLERATO, M. Três tecidos eco-friendly feitos no Brasil para uma produção mais sustentável. 2016. Available in: https://www.modefica.com.br/tecidos-eco-friendly-brasil/#.W8ziwhNKjVo. Access on: 28 out. 2018.
CONTEXTURA. Available in: http://www.shopcontextura.com/. Access on: 7 set. 2021.
COOPER, R.; EDGETT, S.; KLEINSCHMIDI, E. New product portfolio management: practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 16, n. 4, p. 333-350, 1999.
COTTON MOVE. Available in: https://www.facebook.com/cottonmove/. Access on: 7 set., 2021.
EISENHARDT, K. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532-550, 1989.
ESKEROD, P.; HUEMANN, M. Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, v. 6, n. 1, p. 36-50, 2013.
FRAJ-ANDRÉS, E.; MARTINEZ-SALINAS, E.; MATUTE-VALLEJO, J. A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on The Firm’s Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 88, n. 2, p. 263-286, 2009.
HAANAES, K. et al. First look: the second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 52, n. 2, p. 77-83, 2011.
HART, S. Capitalism at the crossroads: the unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems. [s.l.]: Pearson Education. 2005.
HERNÁNDEZ, J. P. S.-I.; YAÑEZ-ARAQUE, B.; MORENO-GARCÍA, J. Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change, v. 151, p. 119-774, 2020.
JORNALISMO NIC. Available in: http://portaldonic.com.br/jornalismo/2017/08/18/cresce-investimento-em-moda-sustentavel-no-brasil/. Access on: 7 set. 2021.
KIRON, D. et al. The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. Sloan Management Review, v. 64, n. 2, p. 69-73, 2013.
KONG, T.; FENG, T.; YE, C. Advanced manufacturing technologies and green innovation: the role of internal environmental collaboration. Sustainability (Switzerland), v. 8, n. 10, p. 1056, 2016.
KUCKARTZ, U.; RÄDIKER, S. Vom Leitfaden Zum Kategoriensystem. In: Fokussierte Interviewanalyse mit MAXQDA. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. 2020.
KVALE, S. The Sage qualitative research kit. Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. 2007.
MAGAZINE. 12 tipos de tecidos sustentáveis: moda que veio para ficar. Arccor Live Limitless. Available in: https://all.accor.com/pt-br/brasil/magazine/one-hour-one-day-one-week/12-tipos-de-tecidos-sustentaveis-38838.shtml. Access on: 7 set. 2020.
MAJUMDAR, S.; MARCUS, A. Rules versus discretion: the productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, v. 44, n. 1, p. 170-179, 2001.
MARTENS, M.; CARVALHO, M. Sustainability and Success Variables in the Project Management Context: an expert panel. Project Management Journal, v. 47, n. 6, p. 24-43, 2016.
MONAST, J.; ADAIR, S. A Triple Bottom Line for Electric Utility Regulation: aligning state-level energy, environmental, and consumer protection goals. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1-65. 2013.
MOVIN. Available in: https://www.facebook.com/startmovin/. Access on: 7 set. 2021.
NATURAL COTTON COLOR. Available in: http://naturalcottoncolor.com.br. Access on: 7 set. 2021.
OECD/EUROSTAT. Oslo Manual: guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, 4th. ed. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg, 2018.
PÉREZ-PÉREZ, J. F.; PARRA, J. F.; SERRANO-GARCÍA, J. A system dynamics model: transition to sustainable processes. Technol. Soc., v. 65, p. 1-16, 2021.
ROUSSEL, P.; SAAD, K.; ERICKSON, T. Third generation R&D: managing the link to corporate strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 1991.
SABINI, L.; MUZIO, D.; ALDERMAN, N. 25 years of “sustainable projects”. What we know and what the literature says. International Journal of Project Management, v. 37, p. 820-838, 2019.
SAN, V.; SPOANN, V.; SCHMIDT, J. Industrial pollution load assessment in PhnomPenh, Cambodia using an industrial pollution projection system. Sci. Total Environ., v. 615, p. 990-999, 2018.
SAUNDERS, M.; LEWIS, P.; THORNHILL, A. Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, New York, 2009.
SEEBODE, D.; JEANRENAUD, S.; BESSANT, J. Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Manage, v. 42, p. 195-206, 2012.
SERRANO-GARCÍA, J. et al. Orchestrating capabilities, organizational dimensions and determinants in the pursuit of green product innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 313, p. 127-173, 2021.
SEZEN, B.; ÇANKAYA, S. Effects of Green Manufacturing and Eco-Innovation on Sustainability Performance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 99, p. 154-163, 2013.
SICOTTE, H.; DROUIN, N.; DELERUE, H. Innovation Portfolio Management as a Subset of Dynamic Capabilities: measurement and impact on innovative performance. Project Management Journal, v. 45, n. 6, p. 58-72, 2014.
SILVIUS, A. J. G. et al. Sustainability in project management. Farnham: Gower Publishing, 2012.
SILVIUS, A.; SCHIPPER, R. A conceptual model for exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success. Procedia Computer Science, v. 64, p. 334-342, 2015.
SU-YUN, S.; JUNG-MIN, H. The Sustainable Green Fashion Marketing Strategies according to Classification of Green Fashion Marketing of Domestic Fashion Companies. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, v. 18, n. 5, 2010.
TARIQ, A. et al. Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technology in Society, v. 51, p. 8-23, 2017.
TURNER, R.; LEDWITH, A.; KELLY, J. Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm. International Journal of Project Management, v. 28, n. 8, p. 744-755, 2010.
WILLEMS, T. et al. Practices of isolation: the shaping of project autonomy in innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management, v. 38, n. 4, p. 215-228, 2020.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Versions
- 2021-12-31 (2)
- 2021-12-28 (1)
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Sustainability in Debate 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.