Para uma reinterpretação teórica dos desafios socioeconômicos da política climática contemporânea

Auteurs-es

  • Eduardo Sá Barreto Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v5n2.2014.9872

Mots-clés :

Política climática, Eficiência energética, Marx

Résumé

A criação do Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas (IPCC) marca o início de uma era de crescente importância da questão ambiental no âmbito da política energética. Um exame do conjunto de iniciativas dos principais países responsáveis pelas emissões de gases de efeito estufa indica que as tentativas de redução da intensidade em emissões é uma tendência geral nos esforços atuais de mitigação. Tomando as políticas de estímulo à eficiência energética como eixo principal desta via, busca-se oferecer as bases para um novo entendimento ”“ baseado na teoria marxiana do valor ”“ da relação entre ganhos de eficiência e consumo de energia, dando assim um novo enquadramento aos desafios econômicos, sociais e tecnológicos impostos pelas mudanças climáticas.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Eduardo Sá Barreto, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Professor adjunto do Departamento de Economia e Finanças da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Références

BHASKAR, R. A Realist Theory of Science. Londres: Verso, 1977.
BICALHO, R. Política energética, fontes alternativas e novas tecnologias. In: PINTO
Jr., H. (Org.) Economia da energia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2007.
BROOKES, L. Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energy Policy, 2000, p. 355-366.
CLARK, B.; YORK, R. Carbon Metabolism: global capitalism, climate change, and
the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, v. 34, p. 391-428, 2005.
COHEN, C. Padrões de consumo e energia: efeitos sobre o meio ambiente e o desenvolvimento.
In: MAY, P.; LUSTOSA, M.; VINHA, V (Org.). Economia do meio ambiente.
Rio de Janeiro: Campus Elsevier, 2003.
DUAYER, M; MEDEIROS, J. L. Marx, Estranhamento e Emancipação: o caráter
subordinado da categoria da exploração na análise marxiana da sociedade do
capital,.Revista de Economia, v. 34, p. 151-161, 2008
FOSTER, J. B. A Planetary Defeat: The Failure of Global Environmental Reform.
Monthly Review, v. 54(8), p. 1-9, 2003.
____________. Capitalism’s Environmental Crisis: is technology the answer?
Monthly Review, v. 52(7), p. 1-13, 2000.
FREEMAN, C.; SOETE, L. A economia da inovação industrial. Campinas: Unicamp,
2008.
G8. Joint Statement by G8 Energy Ministers. Disponível em: <http://
www.enecho.meti.go.jp/topics/g8/g8sta_eng.pdf> Acesso em 01 mar 2013.
GELLER, H.; HARRINGTON, P.; ROSENFELD, A. H.; TANISHIMA, S.; UNANDER, F. Polices
for increasing energy eficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countries.
Energy Policy, v. 34, pp. 556-57, 2006.
HOWARTH, R. Energy efficiency and economic growth. Contemporary Economic
Policy, v.15, 1997.
IEA. Energy policies of IEA countries: 2006 review. Paris: OECD/IEA, 2006.
______. Energy security and climate policy: assessing interactions. Paris: OECD/
IEA, 2007a.
______. IEA energy efficiency policy recommendations to the G8 2007 summit.
Paris: OECD/IEA, 2007b.
______. Worldwide trends in energy use and efficiency: key insights from IEA
indicator analysis. Paris: OECD/IEA, 2008.
______. Implementing energy efficiency policies: are IEA member countries on
track? Paris: OCED/IEA, 2009.
IPCC. Synthesis report. In: PACHAURI, R.K.; REISINGER, A. (Org.). Climate Change
2007: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge
University, 2007a.
IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: METZ, B. et al (Orgs). Mitigation. Contribution
of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2007b.
JEVONS, W. S. The coal question. Londres: Macmillan and Co, 1906 [1865]
JOLLANDS, N.; WAIDEB, P.; ELLISC, M.; ONODAD, T.; LAUSTSENA, J.; TANAKAA, K.;
DE T’SERCLAESA, P.; BARNSLEYA, I.; BRADLEYA, R.; MEIERE, A. The 25 IEA energy
efficiency policy recommendations to the G8 Gleneagles Plan of Action. Energy
Policy, v. 38, p.6409-6418, 2010.
LI, M. Climate Change, Limits to Growth, and the Imperative for Socialism.
Monthly Review, vol. 60, no. 3, p. 51-67, 2008.
LAITNER, J. Energy efficiency: rebounding to a sound analytical perspective.
Energy Policiy, v. 28 p. 6-7, 2000.
LECOCQ, F.; AMBROSI, P. The Clean Development Mechanism: History, Status and prospects. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, v. 1, p. 134-151,
2007.
LUKÁCS, G. Ontologia do Ser Social: Os Princípios Ontológicos Fundamentais
de Marx. São Paulo: LECH, 1979.
MARX, K. O Capital: crítica da economia política. Livro I, volumes 1 e 2. Rio de
Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1994.
_________. O Capital: crítica da economia política. Livro III, volumes 4-6. Rio de
Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1979.
MOEZZI, M. Decoupling energy efficiency from energy consumption. Energy &
Environment, v. 11(5), p. 521-533, 2000.
PEARCE, R.; TURNER, R. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment.
Baltimore: The John Hopkins University, 1990.
PEREIRA, A.; MAY, P. Economia do aquecimento global. In: MAY, P.; LUSTOSA, M.;
VINHA, V (Org.). Economia do meio ambiente. Rio de janeiro: Campus Elsevier,
2003.
POSTONE, M. Tiempo, trabajo y dominación social: una reinterpretación crítica
de Marx. Madrid: Politopías, 2006.
RYAN, D.; YOUNG, D. Modelling energy savings and environmental benefits from
energy policies and new technologies. In: EVANS, J.; HUNT, L. (Org.). International
handbook on the economics of energy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
SÁ BARRETO, E. Apontamentos teóricos para a crítica da economia política do
meio ambiente: da possibilidade de um “consumo verde”. In: XVIII Encontro
Nacional de Economia Política. Belo Horizonte: SEP, 2013.
_______________. Desmaterialização desmistificada: o potencial poupador da
tecnologia e suas implicações ambientais. In: 41º Encontro Nacional de Economia.
Foz do Iguaçú: Anpec, 2013.
SAUNDERS, H. A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-
Brookes. Energy Policy, v. 28, p. 439-449, 2000.
SCHIPPER, L. On the rebound: the interaction of energy efficiency, energy use
and economic activity. An introduction. Energy Policy, v. 28. P. 6-7, 2000.
SCHIPPER, L.; GRUBB, M. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities
and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy, v. 28, 6-7, 2000.
SORREL, S. Jevons’ paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved
energy efficiency. Energy Policy, v. 37, p. 1456-1469, 2009.
STERN, N.; PETERS, S.; BAKHSHI, V.; BOWEN, A.; CAMERON, C.; CATOVSKY, S.; CRANE,
D.; CRUICKSHANK, S.; DIETZ, S.; EDMONDSON, N.; GARBETT, S.; HAMID, L.;
HOFFMAN, G.; INGRAM, D.; JONES, B.; PATMORE, N.; RADCLIFFE, H.; SATHIYARAJAH,
R.; STOCK, M.; TAYLOR, C.; VERNON, T.; WANJIE, H.; ZENGHELIS, D. The Economics
of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2007.
WRI. World Resources Institute Report: an analysis of greenhouse gas intensity
targets. Washington D.C.: World Resources Institute, 2006.
WRI. Analysis of Bush Administration Greenhouse Gas Target. 2003. Disponível
em: http://pdf.wri.org/wri_bush_analysis_2003.pdf. Acesso em 03 fev. 2013.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2014-09-09

Comment citer

Barreto, E. S. (2014). Para uma reinterpretação teórica dos desafios socioeconômicos da política climática contemporânea. Sustainability in Debate, 5(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v5n2.2014.9872

Numéro

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2014)

Rubrique

Articles - Varia

Licence

SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement

The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.