Cultural aspects for adaptation to the climate change impacts on the Ecosystem Services in a case study of Central Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n2.2023.45461Keywords:
climate change, cultural ecosystem services, adaptation strategies, peri-urban cities, resilient communitiesAbstract
Climate adaptation tends to face resistance or produce adverse effects, if it is tested only on the generalist scientific models, ignoring its effects on the culture, values, and worldviews of local communities. This article investigates how climate change has threatened the livelihood and cultural dimensions of peri-urban communities in the Central Amazon. The analysis is based on the cultural theory of risk in climate adaptation and its relationships to local Ecosystem Services (ES). In this case study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with residents of three municipalities in the Metropolitan Area of Manaus-Brazil. Given that their diet used to be heavily based on native food, the results show how Amazonian communities are adapting their eating habits in response to climate and environmental changes to the ES decline in the category of food security (i.e., in the class of provisioning ES). In addition, these services have relevant cultural value (i.e., cultural services). The ES reduction influences adaptation strategies amid the dismantling of current environmental policies. As a result, these communities began to adopt industrialized means of production and consumption, such as adopting products derived from cattle, whose production is the main cause of greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil. Therefore, the studied case demonstrates how climate adaptation may pressure and erode local cultures, when these following the logic of globalized urbanization.
Downloads
References
ADGER, W. et al. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic change, v. 93, n. 3, p. 335-354,
ADGER, W. et al. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, v. 3, n.
, p. 112-117, 2013.
ANDRADE, C. The Inconvenient Truth about Convenience and Purposive Samples. Indian Journal of Psychological
Medicine, v. 43, n. 1, p. 86–88, 17 jan. 2021. DOI 10.1177/0253717620977000
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: São Paulo: Edições, 2011.
BRONDIZIO, E. S. et al. Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: a call for collaboration. Global Environmental
Change, v. 39, p. 318-327, 2016. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.006.
BURKHARD, B. et al. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication
and quantification. Landscape Online, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1–32, 2014. DOI 10.3097/LO.201434
CICES. The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services. (Cices) V5.1. Available at: https://cices.
eu/. Accessed on: june 17. 2022.
COMBERTI, C. et al. Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships
between humans and ecosystems. Global Environmental Change, v. 34, p. 247-262, 2015. DOI 10.1016/j.
gloenvcha.2015.07.007
DAILY, G. C. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems (1997). Yale University Press, 2013.
DAVIDSON, E. A. et al. The Amazon basin in transition. Nature, v. 481, p. 321–328, 2012. DOI 10.1038/nature10717
DELANG, C. O. The Second Phase of the Grain for Green Program: adapting the largest reforestation program in
the world to the new conditions in rural China. Environmental management, v. 64, n. 3, p. 303-312, 2019.
DOUGLAS, M. Risk and blame. Essays in cultural theory. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.
DOUGLAS, M.; WILDAVSKY, A. Introduction: can we know the risks we face? In: Risk and culture. University of
California Press, p. 1-15. 1983.
FISCHER, A. P. Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests. Global Environmental Change,
v. 54, p. 160–171, jan. 2019.
FÜSSEL, H.-M. Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons.
Sustainability Science, v. 2, n. 2, p. 265–275, 21 sept. 2007. DOI 10.1007/s11625-007-0032-y.
GIDDENS, A. As consequências da Modernidade. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp, 1991.
HAIR, J. et al. Multivariate Data Analysis: a global perspective. 7th. ed. [s.l.] Pearson, 2010.
IBGE. Censo 2017. Available at: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/biblioteca-catalogo.html?id=442616&view=detalhes.
Accessed on: feb. 4. 2022.
IBGE. Panorama das Cidades 2019. Available at: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed on: feb. 27. 2023.
IPCC. AR5 Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the
fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press,
IPCC. Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2021.
JAGER, J.; PUTNICK, D. L.; BORNSTEIN, M. H. II. More Than Just Convenient: the scientific merits of homogeneous
convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, v. 82, n. 2, p. 13–30, june
DOI 10.1111/mono.12296.
KADYKALO, A. N. et al. Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’. Ecosystems and
People, v. 15, n. 1, p. 269-287, 2019.
MARENGO, J. A. et al. The drought of 2010 in the context of historical droughts in the Amazon region. Geophysical
Research Letters, v. 38, n. 12, p. n/a-n/a, jun. 2011. DOI 10.1029/2011GL047436
MARENGO, J. A. et al. Recent Extremes of Drought and Flooding in Amazonia: vulnerabilities and human
adaptation. American Journal of Climate Change, v. 02, n. 02, p. 87–96, 2013. DOI 10.4236/ajcc.2013.22009
MARENGO, J. A.; ESPINOZA, J. C. Extreme seasonal droughts and floods in Amazonia: causes, trends and impacts.
International Journal of Climatology, v. 36, n. 3, p. 1033–1050, mar. 2016. DOI 10.1002/joc.4420
MEREDITH, J. R. et al. Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, v. 8, n.
, p. 297–326, out. 1989. DOI 10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8
MILLER, J. Is green the new red?: the role of religion in creating a sustainable China. Nature and Culture, v. 8, n.
, p. 249-264, 2013.
NILES, M. T. et al. Climate change and food systems: assessing impacts and opportunities. 2017.
NOLL, B.; FILATOVA, T.; NEED, A. How does private adaptation motivation to climate change vary across cultures?
Evidence from a meta-analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020.
OTTO, I. M. et al. Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 117, n. 5, p. 2354–2365, 2020. DOI 10.1073/
pnas.1900577117
PFAU-EFFINGER, B. Culture and welfare state policies: reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of social
policy, v. 34, n. 1, p. 3-20, 2005.
PINHO, P. F.; MARENGO, J. A.; SMITH, M. S. Complex socio-ecological dynamics driven by extreme events in the
Amazon. Regional Environmental Change, v. 15, n. 4, p. 643–655, 14 apr. 2015. DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0659-z
PINHO, P. F.; MARENGO, J. A.; SMITH, M. S. Watching Brazil but Missing the Story: an Amazonian inferno. Special
issue on Environmental Justice and Climate Change in Latin America LASAFORUM, v. XLVIII, n. 4, p. 21–25, 2016.
PLIENINGER, T. et al. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land use
policy, v. 33, p. 118-129, 2013.
PNUD. Ranking IDHM dos municípios brasileiros. Available at: https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/
idh0/rankings/idhm-municipios-2010.html. Accessed on: may 08. 2021.
REID, W. V. et al. Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Island Press, 2005.
RUSSELL, R. et al. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual review of
environment and resources, v. 38, p. 473-502, 2013.
SCHOR, T.; MARINHO, T. P. Ciclos econômicos e periodização da rede urbana no Amazonas – Brasil: as cidades de
Parintins e Itacoatiara de 1655 a 2010. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, n. 56, p. 229-258, 2013.
SEEG. Análise das Emissões Brasileiras de GEE e suas implicações para as metas do Brasil: 1970-2019. São Paulo:
Observatório do Clima, 2021.
SEIXAS, S. R. DA C. et al. Percepção de pescadores e maricultores sobre mudanças ambientais globais, no litoral
Norte Paulista, São Paulo, Brasil. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 51–64, 2014.
SEIXAS, S. R. DA C.; NUNES, R. J. Subjectivity in a context of environmental change: opening new dialogues in mental
health research. Subjectivity, v. 10, n. 3, p. 294–312, 11 set. 2017. DOI 10.1057/s41286-017-0032-z
SEIXAS, S. R. DA C.; NUNES, R. J. Percepção de pescadores e maricultores sobre mudanças ambientais globais, no
litoral Norte Paulista, São Paulo, Brasil. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 51-64, 2014.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-017-0032-z.
SZLAFSZTEIN, C. F.; ARAÚJO, A. N. B. DE. Autonomous flood adaptation measures in Amazonian cities (Belém, Brazil).
Natural Hazards, v. 108, n. 1, p. 1069–1087, 4 aug. 2021. DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04720-x
TOMASELLA, J. et al. The droughts of 1996-1997 and 2004-2005 in Amazonia: hydrological response in the river
main-stem. Hydrological Processes, v. 25, n. 8, p. 1228–1242, 15 apr. 2011. DOI 10.1002/hyp.7889
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.