Deforestation (lack of) control in the Brazilian Amazon: from strengthening to dismantling governmental authority (1999-2020)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v13n2.2022.44532Keywords:
Policy dismantling, Land use policies, Deforestation, Brazilian AmazonAbstract
The process of institutionalizing deforestation control policies in the Brazilian Amazon has gone backwards in recent years. This article analyzes the trajectory of these policies between 1999 and 2020, with the dual aims of understanding how and why the State's regulatory capacity has increased and explaining the dismantling of instruments and implementation capacity. This research is based on both qualitative and quantitative approaches, taking deforestation rates as a reference point and compiling the main forestry regulations at the national level in a timeline that covers the rise and fall of these policies. The conclusions show that between 1999 and 2012, the institutional trajectory of national policies and instruments on land use change followed a capacity-building pattern through the consolidation of policies and regulations. However, this pattern went into reverse from 2013 onwards. The period from 2019 has witnessed a process of active policy dismantling, culminating in a new surge in deforestation as well as a notable reduction in forest policy density, which has resulted in important land use changes that may cause irreversible damage to the rainforest and the ecological services it provides.
Downloads
References
ABERS, R.; OLIVEIRA, M. Nomeações políticas no Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2003-2013): interconexões entre ONGs, partidos e governos. Opinião Pública, v. 21, n. 2, p. 336-364, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912015212336
ALBERNAZ, A.; SOARES FILHO, B.; NELSON, B. Estratégias de Conservação para o Programa Arpa. Internal Report. Ibama, Brasília, 2006.
AMORIM, C. Brazilian foreign policy under President Lula (2003-2010): an overview. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53, p. 214-240, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300013
ARAÚJO, M. Avaliação da Implementação do Programa Arpa entre os anos de 2003 e 1º quadrimestre de 2010. Funbio, Brasília. 2010. Available at: http://arpa.mma.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/avaliacao-fase-um1.pdf. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
ARAÚJO, R.; VIEIRA, I. C. Deforestation and the ideologies of the frontier expansion: the case of criticism of the Brazilian Amazon monitoring program. Sustainability in Debate, v. 10, n. 3, p. 354–378, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v10n3.2019.27258
ARIMA, E. et al. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy, v. 41, p. 465-473, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026
AVELINO, D.; FONSECA, I.; POMPEU, J. (ed.) Conselhos Nacionais de Direitos Humanos: uma análise da agenda política. 260p. Ipea, Brasília, 2020.
AVRITZER, L. Civil Society in Brazil. In: ALVAREZ, S. et al. (ed.) Beyond Civil Society. Duke University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373353
AZEVEDO, A. et al. Limits of Brazil's Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 114, n. 29, p. 7653-7658, 2017. .ç10.1073/pnas.1604768114
AZEVEDO-RAMOS, C. et al. Florestas públicas na Amazônia: designar para desenvolver e conservar. Ipam, Belém. 2016. Available at: https://ipam.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Policy-brief-florestas-pu%CC%81blicas.pdf. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
BARBER, C. et al. Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon. Biological Conservation, v. 177, p. 203-209, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004
BARONA, E. et al. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, v. 5, n. 2, p. 1–9, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002
BAUER, M.; KNILL, C. Understanding policy dismantling: an analytical framework. In: BAUER, M. (ed.) Dismantling public policy: preferences, strategies, and effects. OUP, Oxford, p. 30-56, 2012.
BAUER, M. et al. (ed.). Dismantling public policy: preferences, strategies, and effects. OUP, Oxford, 2012.
BRAZIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Plano de Ação para a Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal. Brasília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2004. Available at: http://greenpeace.org.br/amazonia/pdf/govfed_desmatamento_2004-03.pdf. Accessed on: 11/02/2021.
BRAZIL. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima. Brasília: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. 2010. Available at: https://cetesb.sp.gov.br/inventario-gee-sp/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2010/10/2comunicacao_nacional_v2.pdf. Accessed on: 11/02/2021.
BRAZIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Plano Nacional para Controle do Desmatamento Ilegal e Recuperação da Vegetação Nativa (2020-2023). Brasília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2020. Available at: https://www.socioambiental.org/sites/blog.socioambiental.org/files/nsa/arquivos/plano_controle_desmatamento_ilegal_mma_2020.pdf. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
BRUNDTLAND, G. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: our common future. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427, 1987.
BURSZTYN, M.; BURSZTYN, M. A. Fundamentos de política e gestão ambiental: caminhos para a sustentabilidade. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro, 2012, 612p.
BURSZTYN, M. et al. The role of science in the Age of Denial and in times of pandemic: sustainability at the heart of the debate. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, p. 8–13, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n3.2020.35623
CABRAL, A. et al. Deforestation pattern dynamics in protected areas of the Brazilian Legal Amazon using remote sensing data. Applied Geography, v. 100, p. 101-115. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.10.003
CAPELARI, M. et al. Large-Scale Environmental Policy Change: analysis of the Brazilian reality. RAP – Revista Brasileira de Administração Pública, v. 54, p. 1691-1710, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190445
CARVALHO, W. et al. Deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon: a conservation struggle being lost as agréments and regulations are subverted and bypassed. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 17, n. 3, p. 122-130, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2019.06.002
COUTINHO, S. M. et al. The Nexus+ approach applied to studies of Impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Brazil. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, p. 24–56, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n3.2020.33514
DOBROWOLSKY, A.; SAINT-MARTIN, D. Agency, actors and change in a child-focused future: ‘Path dependency’ problematised. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, v. 43, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040500054198
FERRANTE, L.; FEARNSIDE, P. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environ. Conserv., v. 46, p. 261, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000213.
FERRANTE, L.; FEARNSIDE, P. Brazil threatens indigenous lands. Science, v. 369, p. 481–482, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6327
FIORETOS, O.; FALLETI, T.; SHEINGATE, A. Historical institutionalism in political science. In: FIORETOS, O.; FALLETI, T.; SHEINGATE, A. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism. OUP, Oxford, p. 3-28, 2016.
FONSECA, I.; BURSZTYN, M.; MOURA, A. Conhecimentos técnicos, políticas públicas e participação: o caso do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 20, n. 42, p. 183–198, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782012000200013
FRIEDMAN, E.; HOCHSTETLER, K. Assessing the third transition in Latin American democratisation: representational regimes and civil society in Argentina and Brazil. Comparative Politics. v. 35, n. 1 p. 21-42, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4146926
GIBBS, H. et al. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science, v. 347, n. 6220, p. 377-378, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181
GREENER, I. The potential of path dependence in political studies. Politics, v. 25, n. 1, p. 62-72, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00230.x
GÜRTLER, K.; POSTPISCHIL, R.; QUITZOW, R. The dismantling of renewable energy policies: the cases of Spain and the Czech Republic. Energy Policy, v. 133, p. 1-11, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110881
HUBER, R.; FESENFELD, L.; BERNAUER, T. Political populism, responsiveness, and public support for climate mitigation. Climate Policy, v. 20, n. 3, p. 373-386, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1736490
INPE. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. Metodologia usada nos projetos Prodes e Deter. Inpe, Brasília, 2019, 33p. Available at: http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes/pdfs/Metodologia_Prodes_Deter_revisada.pdf. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
JORDAN, A.; BAUER, M.; GREEN-PEDERSEN, C. Policy Dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 20, n. 5, p. 795-805, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.771092
KAY, A. A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Administration, v. 83, n. 3, p. 553-571, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00462.x
KINTISCH, E. Improved Monitoring of Rainforests Helps Pierce Haze of Deforestation. Science, v. 316, n. 5824, p. 536-537, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.316.5824.536
KROLL, C.; ZIPPERER, V. Sustainable Development and Populism. Ecological Economics, v. 176, p. 106723, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106723
KULIN, J.; SEVÄ, I.; DUNLAP, R. Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe. Environmental Politics, p. 1-24, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1898879
LA ROVERE, E. et al. Climate and Development, v. 6, n. sup1, p. 25-33, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2013.812952
LAURANCE, W. et al. Deforestation in Amazonia. Science, v. 304, p. 1109, 2011.
LAURANCE, W. Switch to corn promotes Amazon deforestation. Science, v. 318, n. 5857, p. 1721, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.318.5857.1721b
LEVITSKY, S.; ZIBLATT, D. How Democracies Die. Crown, New York, 2018, 167p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2020.1769280
LOCKWOOD, M. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, v. 27, n. 4, p. 712-732, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
MAHONEY, J. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and society, v. 29, n. 4, p. 507-548, 2000.
MAIA, H. et al. Avaliação do Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal (2007-2010). Brasília: Cepal/Ipea/GIZ, 2011, 54p.
MARQUES, F. Desmatamento na Encruzilhada. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, v. 283. p. 33-35, 2019.
MCCONNELL, A.; HART, P. Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’. Policy Sciences, v. 52, n. 4, p. 645-661, 2019.
MELLO, N.; ARTAXO, P. Evolução do Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, n. 66, p. 108-129, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-901x.v0i66p108-129
MITTERMEIER, R. et al. A Brief History of Biodiversity Conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 601-607, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00709.x
MORTON, D. et al. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v.103, n. 39, p. 14637-14641, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606377103
MOUNK, Y. The people vs. democracy: why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, 2018, 400 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12397
MOUTINHO, P. et al. Achieving zero deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: what is missing? Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, v. 4, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000125
NORTH, D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
PEREZ, L. P. et al. Climate change and disasters: analysis of the Brazilian regional inequality. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, p. 260–296, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n3.2020.33813
PIERSON, P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American political science review, v. 94, n. 2, p. 251-267, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
PLAFF, A. et al. Protected areas’ impacts on Brazilian Amazon deforestation: examining conservation–development interactions to inform planning. PloS One, v. 10, n. 7, p. e0129460, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129460
PNUC. Painel Unidades de Conservação Brasileiras. Departamento de Áreas Protegidas. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2020. Available at: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiMjUxMTU0NWMtODkyNC00NzNiLWJiNTQtNGI3NTI2NjliZDkzIiwidCI6IjM5NTdhMzY3LTZkMzgtNGMxZi1hNGJhLTMzZThmM2M1NTBlNyJ9. Accessed on: 14th February 2021.
PRODES/INPE. Monitoramento do Desmatamento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite. 2020. Available at: http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes. Accessed on: 14th Februrary 2021.
RODRIGUES FILHO, S. et al. Election-driven weakening of deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, v. 43, p. 111-118, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.002
RORIZ, P.; YANAI, A.; FEARNSIDE, P. Deforestation and Carbon Loss in Southwest Amazonia: impact of Brazil’s Revised Forest Code. Environmental Management, n. 60, p. 367–382, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0879-3
SABATIER, P.; WEIBLE, C. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: SABATIER, P. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, New York, p. 189–220, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689
SABOURIN, E.; CRAVIOTTI, C.; MILHORANCE, C. The dismantling of family farming policies in Brazil and Argentina. International Review of Public Policy, v. 2, n. 2, p. 45-67, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.799
SANTOS, D. J. et al. Future rainfall and temperature changes in Brazil under global warming levels of 1.5ºC, 2ºC and 4ºC. Sustainability in Debate, v. 11, n. 3, p. 57–90, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n3.2020.33933
SKOCPOL, T.; EVANS, P.; RUESCHEMEYER, D. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985, 390p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628283
SOARES FILHO, B. et al. Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science, v. 344, n. 6182, p. 363-364, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663
TABOULCHANAS, K. et al. Avaliação do Fundo Clima. Cepal/Giz/Ipea, Brasília, 2016. Available at: https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/170126_livro_s1601337_pt.pdf. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
TERRABRASILIS/INPE. Plataforma de Dados Geográficos, 2020. Available at: http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br. Accessed on: 14 February 2021.
VALE, M. et al. Covid-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil. Biological Conservation, v. 255, 108994, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.10899
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
