Economic indicators of sustainability for onshore oil fields:
a methodological proposal for indicator selection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v7n2.2016.17715Keywords:
Campos Petrolíferos, Indicadores de Sustentabilidade, Percepção SocioambientalAbstract
Based on the fact that sustainability can be measured by means of scientifically based indicators that allow for a secure evaluation methodology and considering that the criteria for selecting this indicators
are in general influenced by subjective judgements made by those who choose them, this articles seeks to propose a methodology based on the socioenvironmental perception of social actors in association with the selection of economic indicators of suatainability selected according to the Delphi methodology. Data were taken from the population and compared with the positions adopted by specialists, in order to understand the researched contexto and weed out conflicting views. Perception indicators E1, E3, E19 and E20, value-laden indicators E2, E12, E13 and atitude-based indicator E17 were selected. The conclusion is that the use of perception as related to the Delphi methodology was effective in the identification of the basic indicators for the evaluation od the economic sustainability of onshore oil fields.
Downloads
References
BARDIN,L. Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70, São Paulo, 2011.
BOLFARINE, H.; BUSSAB, W. O. Elementos de Amostragem. Blucher, São Paulo, 2005.
CAVALCANTI, C. (Org.). Meio ambiente, desenvolvimento sustentável e políticas públicas. 4. ed. Cortez, São Paulo, 2002.
CORRÊA, R. L. Trajetórias Geográficas. BCD União de Editoras, Rio de Janeiro, 1997.
COSTA FILHO, A. Riscos e Vulnerabilidades- Campo Petrolífero Canto do Amaro, Mossoró. Tese (Doutorado em Recursos Naturais) UFCG, Campina Grande, 2007.
GALLOPIN, G. C. Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators: a system approach. Environmental modeling and assment, v. 1, p. 101”“107, 1996.
HAMMOND, A. et al. Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 1995.
GLOBAL REPORTING INICIATIVE ”“ GRI. Sustainability reporting guidelines & Oil and Gas Sector Supplement. Versão 3.1, 2012.
HAK, T.; KOVANDA, J.; WEINZETTEL, J. A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s Sustainable Development Strategy. Ecological Indicators, v. 17, p. 46”“57, 2012.
IBGE. Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Brasil 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/recursosnaturais/ids/ids2010.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2015.
MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Caderno de informações de saúde: Informações Gerais. Disponível em: <http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/tabdata/cadernos/rn.htm>. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2014.
LUCENA, M. M; FREIRE, E. M. Percepção ambiental como instrumento de participação social na proposição de área prioritária no semiárido. Interthesis, v. 11, n. 1, p. 147-171, jan./jun. 2014.
MACLAREN, V. W. The use of social surveys in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 7, n. 4, p. 363”“375, 1987.
MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS E. M. Metodologia Científica. Atlas S.A, São Paulo, 2011.
MARTINS, M. DE F.; CÂNDIDO, G. A. Sistemas de Indicadores de Sustentabilidade Urbana: Os desafios do processo de Mensuração, Análise e Monitoramento. Sustentabilidade em Debate, v. 6, n. 2, p. 138, 2015.
MOLDAN, B.; JANOUÅ KOVÁ, S.; HÁK, T. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, v. 17, p. 4”“13, 2012.
MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A.; SADLER, B. The art and science of impact assessment: results of a survey of IAIA members. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 28, n. 1, p. 77”“82, 2010.
ONU. Declaração da Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano ”“ 1972. ONU, Estocolmo, 1972. Disponível em <http://www.onu.org.br/
rio20/img/2012/01/estocolmo1972.pdf>. Acesso em: 27 out. 2015.
OECD. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user guide- 2008. Disponível em: <http://www.oecd.org/std/42495745.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2015.
OLIVEIRA, L. de. Percepção Ambiental. Revista Geografia e Pesquisa, v. 6, p. 56-72, 2012.
PINTÉR, L. et al. Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, v. 17, p. 20”“28, 2012.
POPE, J.; ANNANDALE, D.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 24, n. 6, p. 595”“616, 2004.
ROBERTSON, J. Likert-type Scales, Scales, Statistical Methods, and Effect Sizes. Communications of the ACM, v. 55, n. 5, p.6; 2012.
RODRIGUES, M. L. et al. A percepção ambiental como instrumento de apoio na gestão e na formulação de políticas públicas ambientais. Saúde e Sociedade, v. 21, p. 96”“110, dez. 2012.
SÁNCHEZ, L. E.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Teaching impact assessment: Results of an international survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, v. 28, n. 3, p. 245”“250, 2010.
SANTOS, A.C; BECKER, E. Entre o homem e a natureza: abordagens teórico-metodológicas. Redes Editora, Porto Alegre, 2012.
SANTOS, B. S. Um discurso sobre as ciências. 5. ed. Cortez, São Paulo, 2008.
SANTOS, M. Técnica, espaço, tempo. 5. ed. Edusp, São Paulo, 2013.
SIENA, O. Método para avaliar desenvolvimento sustentável: técnicas para escolha e ponderação de aspectos e dimensões. Produção, v. 18, n. 2, p. 359”“374, 2008.
SINAN ERZURUMLU, S.; ERZURUMLU, Y. O. Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis. Resources Policy, out. 2014.
TAYRA, F.; RIBEIRO, H. Modelos de indicadores de sustentabilidade: síntese e avaliação crítica das principais experiências. Saúde e Sociedade, v. 15, n. 1, p. 84”“95, 2006.
TOLMASQUIM, M. T.; PINTO JR, H. Q. (org). Marcos regulatórios da indústria mundial do Petróleo. Synergia, Rio de Janeiro, 2011.
TUAN, YI-FU. Topofilia: um estudo da percepção, atitudes e valores do meio ambiente. Eduel, Londrina, 2012.
VALENTIN, A.; SPANGENBERG, J. H. A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 381”“392, 2000.
VAN BELLEN, H. M. Indicadores de Sustentabilidade: uma análise comparativa. Editora FGV, Rio de Janeiro, 2005.
VEIGA, J. E. DA. Indicadores de sustentabilidade. Estudos Avançados, v. 24, n. 68, p. 39”“52, 2010.
VEIGA, J. E. DA. O âmago da sustentabilidade. Estudos Avançados, v. 28, n. 82, p. 7”“23, dez. 2014.
VIANA, M. B. Avaliando Minas: índice de sustentabilidade da mineração. Tese (Doutorado em Desenvolvimento Sustentável).Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2012.
VILLAS-BÔAS, R. C.; SHIELDS, D.; SOLAR, S.; ANCIAUX, P.; ONAL, G. (ed). A review on indicators of sustainability for the mineral extraction industries. CETEM/MCT/CNPq/CYTED/INPC, Rio de Janeiro, 2005.
WHYTE, A. V. T. La perception de l’environnement: lignes directrices méthodologiques pour les études sur le terrain. UNESCO, Paris, 1978. Disponível em < http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0002/000247/024707fo.pdf>. Acesso em: 07 set. 2015.
WHYTE, A. V. T. Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. UNESCO, Paris, 1977. Disponível em http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0002/000247/ 024707eo.pdf>. Acesso em: 07 set. 2015.
WRIGHT, J. T. C; GIOVINAZZO, R. A. Delphi- uma ferramenta de apoio ao planejamento prospectivo. Caderno de pesquisas em administração. v. 01, n. 12, p. 54-65, 2º Trim./ 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
