Taking Charge

Validity Evidence for the Brazilian Version of the Scale

Authors

  • Thainá Tavares do Nascimento Universidade de Brasília
  • Jacob Arie Laros Universidade de Brasília
  • Juliana Barreiros Porto Universidade de Brasília
  • Melissa Machado de Moraes ESSEC Business School

Keywords:

Validation, Proactivity, Taking charge

Abstract

This research aimed to explore validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the taking charge scale. A sample
of 197 Brazilian workers was used and data were collected via an online survey. The measurement model was tested, as well as the relationship with variables of the nomological network and with the proactive behavior called voice. The data suggests that the construct is composed by one factor and can be reliably measured in Brazil using eight of the ten items of the original scale. The confirmation of the expected correlations with the nomological net variables suggests construct validity, as well as the test of the hypothesized model that includes the other proactive behavior, which showed evidence of concurrent and discriminant validity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A

resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3),

”“487. doi:10.2307/256219

Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during

organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199”“214. doi:10.1037/0021-

81.2.199

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component

of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal

of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103”“118. doi:10.1002/

job.4030140202

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1999). Proactive behavior: Meaning,

impact, recommendations. Business Horizons, 42(3), 63”“70.

doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(99)80023-8

Byrne, B. M. (2009a). Bootstrapping as an aid to nonnormal data.

In Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts,

applications, and programming (2nd ed., pp. 329”“352). New

York, NY: Routledge.

Byrne, B. M. (2009b). Testing for the factorial validity of a

theoretical construct (first-order CFA model). In Structural

equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications,

and programming (2nd ed., pp. 53”“95). New York, NY.

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations.

J o u r n a l o f M a n a g e m e n t , 2 6 ( 3 ) , 4 3 5 ”“ 4 6 2 .

doi:10.1177/014920630002600304

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation

models with unobservable variables and measurement

error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39”“50.

doi:10.2307/3151312

Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity

at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3”“34.

doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002

Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing

the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee

proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528”“550.

doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968043

Grant, A. M., Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit

for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what

you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31”“55.

doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in

covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus

new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1”“55.

doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

Idaszak, J. R., & Fritz, D. (1987). A revision of the Job Diagnostic

Survey: Elimination of a measurement artifact. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 69”“74. doi:10.1037/0021-

72.1.69

LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in

work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853”“868.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853

Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011).

Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and

organizational effectiveness: Do challenge-oriented behaviors

really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line?

Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 559”“592. doi:10.1111/j.1744-

2011.01219.x

Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression & correlation:

A guide for students and researchers. London: SAGE

Publications Ltd.

Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work:

Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of

Management Journal, 42(4), 403”“419. doi:10.2307/257011

Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy:

The roles of job enrichment and other organizational

interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835”“852.

doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835

Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating

and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of

Management, 36(3), 633”“662. doi:10.1177/0149206308321554

Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the

antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 91(3), 636”“652. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636

Pilati, R., & Laros, J. A. (2007). Modelos de equações estruturais

em psicologia: Conceitos e aplicações. Psicologia: Teoria e

Pesquisa, 23(2), 205”“216.

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive

personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology,

(3), 416”“427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416

Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010).

Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative

meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of

Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275”“300.

doi:10.1348/096317910x502359

Thompson, B. (2004a). Confirmatory factor analysis decision

sequence. In Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis:

Understanding concepts and applications (pp. 109”“132).

Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Thompson, B. (2004b). Testing model invariance. In Exploratory

and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts

and applications (pp. 153”“162). Washington, DC: American

Psychological Association.

Tornau, K., & Frese, M. (2013). Construct clean-up in proactivity

research: A meta analysis on the nomological net of workrelated

proactivity concepts and their incremental validities.

Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62(1), 44”“96.

doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00514.x

Urbina, S. (2007). Fundamentos em validade. In Fundamentos de

Testagem Psicológica (pp. 155”“212). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice

extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive

validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108”“119.

doi:10.2307/256902

Published

2017-05-17

How to Cite

do Nascimento, T. T., Laros, J. A., Porto, J. B., & de Moraes, M. M. (2017). Taking Charge: Validity Evidence for the Brazilian Version of the Scale. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 32(3). Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18233

Issue

Section

Estudos Empíricos