Family farmers and the diamondback moth: recognition, control, and difficulties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v15i5.50176Keywords:
Brassicaceae, Cabbage, Ethno-Knowledge, Rural ExtensionAbstract
Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) is the main pest that attacks kale (Brassica oleracea L.) and, when poorly controlled, can compromise the entire production. The objective of this work was to carry out a diagnosis of P. xylostella control practices adopted by family farmers who grow cabbage in the municipalities of Lucas do Rio Verde, Sorriso and Sinop, aiming to generate knowledge that increases the consumption of vegetables, as foods that promote health. These municipalities together produced 143 tons of cabbage, almost entirely produced by family farmers. It were selected 42 producers who answered the proposed questionnaire and it was found that the most used method of controlling is chemical, followed by biological. Regarding chemical control, it occurs with the use of 28 commercial products, of which only 10 are registered, and this activity exposes producers to direct contact with pesticides during the application of the products. Allied to this, the EPIs are not used properly, although they know its importance. Alternative controls such as the use of botanical extracts and / or alternative components are known, but little used and there are several difficulties reported to control the moth.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 autor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.