Las modulaciones del poder. Cercanía y poder en la consulta de medicina familiar y comunitaria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35956/v.21.n2.2021.p.142-159Keywords:
doctor – patient interaction, power, closeness, negotiationAbstract
The different medico-ideological contexts present different possibilities of negotiation spaces according to the degree of admission of the patient's initiative and the acceptance of the script by the latter. The dimensions of closeness and power, present in all consultations, gravitate differently in the construction of the doctor-patient interaction, prioritizing closeness and power. Studying the operation of these dimensions in Family Medicine medical consultations, located in the biopsychosocial paradigm and focused on the subjective and contextual aspects of people, will be able to show the management of divergences and how, thanks to this, an attempt is made to balance the practice of power for social responsibility, something that not only limits the power of the doctor, but also allows the empowerment of the patient.
Downloads
References
AGAR, M. 1985. Institutional discourse. Text 5, 3: 247-168.
AINSWORTH-VAUGHN, N. 1998. Claiming Power In Doctor-Patient Talk. New York, Oxford: University
Press.
ARUNDALE, R. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research
on face, facework and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2, 2: 193-216.
BAKER, S. y Watson, B. 2015. How Patients Perceive Their Doctor’s Communication: Implications
for Patient willingness to Communicate. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34, 6: 621- 639.
BARRÁN, J. P. 1992. Medicina y sociedad en el Uruguay del Novecientos. Montevideo: Ediciones de
la Banda Oriental.
BENCHERKI, N., Matte, F. y Cooren, F. 2020. Authority and power in social interaction. Methods
and analysis. London: Routledge.
BLOMMAERT, J. 2007. Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4, 1: 1- 19.
BRAVO, D. 1999. ¿Imagen positiva vs. imagen negativa? Pragmática sociocultural y componentes de
face. Oralia. Análisis del discurso oral 2: 155-184.
CAFFI, C. 2007. Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
CANDLIN, CH, Crichton, J. y Moore, S. 2017. Exploring discourse in context and action. London:
Palgrave MacMillan.
CARRANZA, I. 2020. Narrativas interaccionales. Una mirada sociolingüística a la actividad de narrar
en encuentros sociales. Córdoba: Editorial Facultad de Lenguas.
CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. y Seale, C. 2010. Gender and the language of illness. London: Palgrave
MacMillan.
CORDELLA, M. 2004. The Dynamic consultation. A discourse analytical study of doctor-patient communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
DIAMOND, J. 1996. Status and power in verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
DÍAZ BERENGUER, A. 2010. El narcisismo en la medicina contemporánea. Montevideo: Trilce.
DÍAZ BERENGUER, A. 2020. El poder médico. Montevideo: Estuario editora
DÍAZ, A. s/f. La medicina familiar como medicina médica específica de los programas de atención
primaria a la salud. MS
FAIRCLOUGH, N. 2003. Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
FAMY, A. 2018. [Disponible en línea en https://hal-unilim.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01732135].
Interactions médecins/patients :pratique discursive et transmission des savoirs. [Consulta: 21 de
septiembre de 2020].
FOUCAULT, M. 1988 El sujeto y el poder. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 50, 3: 3-20.
FOUCAULT, M. 1992. Microfísica del poder. Madrid: Las Ediciones de la piqueta.
FRENCH, J. & Raven, B. 1959. The basis of social power. En D. Cartwright (Ed.). Studies in social
power, pp. 150-167. Oxford: University of Michigan Press.
GASIOREK, J. 2015. Epilogue: Engaging Identity and Foregrounding Context in Health Communication
Research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34, 6: 702– 708.
GOFFMAN, E. 1959. La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu
editores.
GOFFMAN, E. 1981. Footing. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
GREEN, L. 2004. The Research Domain of Family Medicine. Annals of family medicine, 2, 2: 23-29.
HERITAGE, J. 2018. Expression of Authority in US Primary Care: Offering Diagnoses and Recommending
Treatment. Paper presented at the GURT.
HERITAGE, J. & Maynard. 2006. Introduction. Analyzing interaction between doctors and patients
in primary care encounters. En J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.). Communication in medical
care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients, pp. 1-21. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
HERNÁNDEZ FLORES, N. 1999. Politeness ideology in Spanish coloquial conversation: the case of
advice. Pragmatics 9: 37-49.
HERNÁNDEZ FLORES, N. 2020. ‘Amabilidad’, ‘atención’, ‘profesionalidad’. Valores sociales atribuidos
por el paciente a su médico de cabecera y características de imagen social. Discurso & Sociedad
, 2: 309-334.
KEYMAYD ROTTA, A. 2007. Medicina familiar en Uruguay: hacia un nuevo modelo de atención.
Atención Primaria 39, 8: 443-445.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, C. 2005. Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand Colin.
MADFES, I. 2005. Membresía y confrontación en la entrevista médica: estrategias comunicativas en
la formulación de . en: ll Coloquio Argentino de la IADA (International Association
for Dialogue Análisis), 2005, La Plata. Actas del ll Coloquio Argentino de la IADA (International
Association for Dialogue Análisis). Medio de divulgación: CD-Rom; ISSN/ISBN: 9503-4033
MADFES, I. 2006. “Contáme cómo andas”: tensión entre afiliación y confrontación en la entrevista
médica. En B. Gabbiani, B. y I Madfes (Orgs.). Conversación y poder. Análisis de interacciones en
aulas y consultorios, pp. 35:76. Montevideo: FHCE.
MARTIN, G. 2014. Pragmatics and medical discourse. En K. Schneider y A. Barron (Eds.). Pragmatics
of Discourse, pp. 491-525. Berlin: De Gruyter.
MARTÍN ROJO, L. 2017. Language and power. En O. García, N. Floresy M. Spotti (Eds.). The
Oxford Handbook Of Language and Society, pp. 77:102. New York: Oxford University Press.
MAY, C. 2007. The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology 41: 29-45.
MERCER, H. 1997: Los procesos de atención a la salud en el conjunto de las relaciones sociales.
Sociedad, cultura y salud. FHCE, Montevideo.15:30
MISCHLER, E. 1984. The discourse of medecine. Norvood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
MONDADA, L. 2006. Interactions en situation professionelles et institutionelles: de l’analyse détallée
aux retombées pratiques. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 9: 5-16.
MUMBY, D. & Stohl, C. 1991. Power and discourse in organization studies Absence and the dialectic
of control. Discourse & Society 2: 313-332.
OSTERMAN, A. C. y Meneghel, S. 2012. Humanização, gênero e poder nos atendimentos a saúde:
posibilidades que se apresentam a partir dos estudos de fala-em-interação. En A. Osterman y S.
MENEGHEL (Orgs.). Humanização, gênero e poder. Contribuções dos estudos de fala-em-interação para
a atenção da saúde, pp. 11-32. Río de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz.
PONZO, J. 2020. La Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria en Uruguay de 1997 a 2019: ¿cuántos kilómetros
faltarán para llegar al pueblo aquel?. Ciência. saúde coletiva 25, 4: 1205-1214.
RIBEIRO, B.T. 2006. Footing, positioning and voice. Are we talking about the same things? En A.
de Finna, D. Schiffrin y M. Bamberg (Eds.). Discourse and identity, pp. 48:83. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
ROBINSON, J. Soliciting patient’presenting concerns. En J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.). Communication
in medical care. Interaction between primary care physicians and patients, 22-47. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
SIMPSON, P., Mayr, A. y Statham, S. 2019. Language and power. A resource book for students. London:
Routledge.
TANNEN, D. y Wallat, C. 1993. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples
from a medical examination/interview. En D. Tannen (Ed.). Framing in discourse, pp. 57:76.
New York: Oxford University Press.
THORNBORROW, J. 2002. Power talk. Language and interaction in institutional discourse. London:
Routledge.
TRAVERSO, V. 2007 Pratiques communicatives en situation: objets et méthodes de l’analyse d’interaction. Article de synthèse sur l’interaction. Recherches en soins infirmiers 89: 21-33
TURNER, J. 2005. Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. J. Soc. Psychol 35: 1-22.
VAN DIJK, T. 1995. Discourse, Power and Access. En C. Carldas-Coulthard y M. Coulthard (Eds.).
Texts and practices, pp. 84-10. London: Routledge.
WAITZKIN, H. 1988. A Critical Theory of Medical Discourse: Ideology, Social Control, and the Processing
of Social Context in Medical Encounters. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 30: 220-239.
WARTENBERG, T. 1990. The forms of power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
WEGER, H. 2014. The Relative Effectiveness of Active Listening in Initial Interactions. International
Journal of Listening 28, 1: 13-31.
WILCE, J. 2009. Medical Discourse. Annu. Rev. Anthropology 39: 199-215.
WODAK, R. 1996. Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.
WODAK, R. & Meyer, M. [2001] 2016. Critical discourse studies: agenda, theory and methodology.
En R. Wodak y M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse studies, pp. 1-23. Los Angeles: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Irene Madfes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee RALED the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
