Marcadores de modalidad epistémica y evidencial en el análisis de las conclusiones de artículos de investigación de disciplinas distintas

Keywords:

epistemic modality. evidentiality. grammaticalisation. modal verbs. semimodals verbs.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the description of an academic genre: the research article, studying some linguistic devices used to convey epistemic and evidential modality. In particular, I will examine the use of certain markers of epistemic and evidential modality: epistemic and evidential verbs, modal and semimodal verbs, in the discussion/ conclusion of research articles in medical sciences and paleontology, focusing on the relation between these modal markers and the notions of subjectification and grammaticalisation. I claim that modality is a linguistic category with gradual distinctions, which characterize modal markers along a scalar dimension of subjectivity, related with degrees of grammaticalization. I will try to show that these modal markers are related to the domain of the discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber, d. & finnegan, e. (1989) “Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”. Text, 9(1): 93-124.

Boas, f. (1947) “Kawakiult grammar, with a glossary of the suffixes”. Transactions of the America Philosophical Society, 37, 3: 201-377.

bybee, j. (1985) Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Bybee, J.; Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. (1994) The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bunge, M. (1983) La Investigación Científica. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.

Chafe, W. (1986) “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”, en W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.): Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, N.J: Ablex: 261-272.

Ciapuscio, G. (2004) “El verbo poder en el discurso científico oral. Aportes teóricodescriptivos para el estudio gramatical”. RASAL, N° 1: 81-99.

daneš, F. (1987) “Cognition and Emotion in Discourse Interaction: A preliminary Survey of the Field”, en Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Linguistics, Berlin: 168-179.

Di Tullio, A. (2003) “Valores aspectuales del auxiliar saber en el español de Argentina”. Ponencia presentada en el II Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Instituto Superior I.E.S Lenguas Vivas “Juan Ramón Fernández”. Buenos Aires, 7-9 de agosto de 2003.

Di Tullio, Á. (2005) Manual de gramática del español. Buenos Aires: Ediciones La Luna.

Ferrari, L. (2009a) “Variación disciplinar y comunicación especializada”, en A. Parini y A. Zorrilla (comps.) Comunicación y Escritura. Buenos Aires: Editorial Teseo: Universidad de Belgrano: 57-75.

Ferrari, L. (2009b) “Variación disciplinar y estrategias argumentativas en la comunicación académica”. Actas de las I Jornadas de Lógica y Argumentación. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento, 6 y 7 de agosto de 2009.

Ferrari, L. (en prensa) “Modalidad y variación disciplinar en el discurso especializado: verbos modales”. Cuadernos del Sur Letras. Universidad Nacional del Sur.

Finnegan, E. (1995) “Subjectivity and subjectivisation: an introduction”, en D. Stein and S. Wright, (eds.) Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge University Press:

Gómez T., L. (1999) “Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo”, en I. Bosque y V. Demonte (directores) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 2. Madrid, Espasa-Calpe: 3323-3389.

hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Langacker, R. W. (1985) “Observations and speculations on subjectivity”, en J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 109-50.

Langacker, R. (1990) “Subjectification”. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5-38.

Langacker, R. (1993) “Reference point construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1-38.

Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nuyts, J. (2001) Epistemic Modality. Language and Conceptualization. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Ochs, E. (ed.) (1989) The Pragmatics of Affect on Text 9(1), Special issue.

Palmer, F. R. (1986) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Palmer, F. R. (2001) Mood and Modality. 2nd.edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Silva C., C. (1995) “Contextual Conditions for the Interpretation of poder and deber in Spanish”, en J. Bybee & S. Fleishman (eds.) Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

swadesh, M. (1939) “Nootka internal syntax”. International Journal of American Linguistics 9: 77-102.

Traugott, E. (1995) “Subjectification in grammaticalization”, en D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 31-54.

Published

2020-10-19

How to Cite

Marcadores de modalidad epistémica y evidencial en el análisis de las conclusiones de artículos de investigación de disciplinas distintas. (2020). Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Del Discurso, 9(2), 5–23. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/raled/article/view/33548

Issue

Section

Research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.