John Hick’s Cultural Approach as a Response to the Problem of Religious Diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v10i1.47754Keywords:
Filosofia Analítica da Religião. Epistemologia da Experiência Religiosa. Diversidade Religiosa. John Hick.Abstract
This paper discusses John Hick’s response to the problem of religious diversity, based on the distinction between the Real itself and the way He is experienced and thought of by different religious communities. To this end, we divided this work into three sections in addition to the present introduction and the final considerations. In the first section we present the hickian concept of religious phenomenon and discuss the affirmation of him in favor of the ambiguity of the universe; the second section is dedicated to the analysis of Hick’s defense of the rationality of religious belief and in the third section we present Hick’s pluralist hypothesis and some variations and criticisms of this hypothesis proposed by other authors. At the end we present some critical considerations about the success of Hick’s hypothesis to respond to the problem of religious diversity.
Downloads
References
ALSTON, W. (2020). Percebendo Deus: a experiência religiosa justificada | Amazon.com.br (1a). Carisma.
AQUINO, Tomás de (2016). Suma Teológica (4a, Vol. 3). CEDET.
BYRNE, P. (1995). Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism. In Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390072
HARRISON, V. S. (2006). Internal realism and the problem of religious diversity. Philosophia, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-006-9029-5
HEIM, D. S. M. (1994). SALVATIONS: A MORE PLURALISTIC HYPOTHESIS. Modern Theology, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.1994.tb00044.x
HICK, John (2018). Uma interpretação da religião: respostas humanas ao transcendente. São Paulo: Vozes.
KANT, Immanuel. (2018). Critica da Razão Pura (4a). São Paulo: Vozes.
KNITTER, P. F. (2013). one earth many religions. Multifaith Dialogue and Global Responsibility.
PLANTINGA, A. (2018). Crença cristã avalizada. Vida Nova.
RUHMKORFF, S. (2013). The incompatibility problem and religious pluralism beyond Hick. Philosophy Compass, 8, 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12032/abstract
SILVER, D. (2001). Religious experience and the facts of religious pluralism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 49, 1–17.
SWINBURNE, R. (2005). Faith and Reason (2a). Cleredon Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.